This study investigated the meaning of family-centered intervention and the extent to which it is being implemented from the perspectives of both professionals and families who participated in developing IFSPs. Practice indicators reflecting three principles of family-centered intervention were developed to evaluate current practices. Findings from semi-structured interviews indicated that professionals have an understanding of the change in focus from child to family; however, there is some incongruence between family-centered attitudes and actual practice. Although families expressed overall satisfaction with services they were receiving, some professionals were clearly more family-centered than others in their practice. Implications for the development of practices to support the family-centered intent of IDEA, Part H, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Able-Boone, H., Sandall, S.R., Loughry, A., & Frederick, L.L. (1990). An informed, family-centered approach to Public Law 99–457: Parental views. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 100–111.
2.
Bailey, D.B. (1987). Collaborative goal-setting with families: Resolving differences in values and priorities for services. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 7, 59–71.
3.
Bailey, D.B., Buysse, V., Edmondson, R., & Smith, T.(1992). Creating family-centered services in early intervention: Perceptions of professionals in four states. Exceptional Children, 58, 298–309.
4.
Bailey, D.B., Palsha, S.A., & Simeonsson, R.J. (1991). Professional skills, concerns, and perceived importance of work with families in early intervention. Exceptional Children, 58, 156–165.
5.
Brotherson, M.J., & Goldstein, B. (1992). Time as a resource and constraint for parents of young children with disabilities: Implications for early intervention services. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 508–527.
6.
Brown, C.W. (1991). IFSP implementation in the fourth year of P.L. 99–457: The year of the Paradox. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 1–18.
7.
Dunst, C.J. (1985). Rethinking early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 165–201.
8.
Dunst, C.J., Johanson, C., Trivette, C.M., & Hamby, D. (1991). Family-oriented early intervention policies and practices: Family-centered or not?. Exceptional Children, 58, 115–126.
9.
Dunst, C.J., Trivette, C.M., & Deal, A.G. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
10.
Federal Register (July 30, 1993). Vol. 58, No. 145; 34CFR Part 303 Rules and Regulations. Dept. of Education, Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities: Final Rule.
11.
Guba, E.G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75–92.
12.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
Kaiser, A.P., & Hemmeter, M.L. (1989). Value-based approaches to family intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 8, 72–86.
14.
Krauss, M.W. (1990). New precedent in family policy: Individualized family service plan. Exceptional Children, 56, 388–395.
15.
Mahoney, G., & O'Sullivan, P. (1990). Early intervention practices with families of children with handicapsMental Retardation, 28, 169–176.
16.
Mahoney, G., O'Sullivan, P., & Dennebaum, J. (1990). Maternal perceptions of early intervention services: A scale for assessing family-focused intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 1–15.
17.
Mahoney, G., O'Sullivan, P., & Fors, S. (1989). The family practices of service providers of young handicapped children. Infant Mental Health Journal, 10, (2), 75–83.
18.
McBride, S.L., Brotherson, M.J., Joanning, H., Whiddon, D., & Demmitt, A.(1992). Project IFSP Summary. Submitted to the Iowa Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education, Des Moines, IA.
19.
McGonigel, M.J., Kaufmann, R.K., & Johnson, B.H. (1991). Guidelines and recommended practices for the individualized family service plan (2nd ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System and the Association for the Care of Children's Health.
Shelton, T.L., Jeppson, E.S., & Johnson, B.(1987). Family-centered care for children with special health care needs. Washington, DC: Association for the Care of Children's Health.
22.
Smith, J.K. (1984). The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6, 379–391.
23.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1988). Understanding and conducting qualitative research. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
24.
Summers, J.A., Dell'Oliver, C., Turnbull, A.P., Benson, H.A., Santelli, E., Campbell, M., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1990). Examining the individualized family service plan process: What are family and practitioner preferences?. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 78–99.
25.
Taylor, S.J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. New York: Wiley and Sons.
26.
Turnbull, A.P. (1988). The challenge of providing comprehensive support to families. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 261–272.
27.
Turnbull, A.P., Summers, J.A., & Brotherson, M.J. (1984). Working with families with disabled family members: A family systems perspective. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
28.
Winton, P.J. (1988). The family focused interview: An assessment measure and goal-setting mechanism. In D.B. Bailey & R.J. Simeonsson (Eds.), Family assessment in early intervention (pp. 185–205). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
