The purpose of this manuscript is to describe a data analysis technique, content analysis, used to examine written or verbal communication, and to discuss the potential of content analysis for application within early intervention. Special attention is directed at the use of referential or thematic recording units derived from data obtained in interview format. The article identifies specific procedural guidelines for the early interventionist researcher to utilize, and addresses issues of rigor, and validity. Discussion follows of the use of content analysis within the field of early intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
2.
Borg, W., & Gall, M. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
3.
Bricker, D., & Gumerlock, S. (1988). Application of a three-level evaluation plan for monitoring child progress and program effects. The Journal of Special Education, 22(1), 66–81.
4.
Cohen, J. (1965). Some statistical issues in psychological research. In B.B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of clinical psychology.New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Fagan, W., & Currie, M. (1983). Comprehension categorical differences and unit of language analysis. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 19–29.
6.
Fewell, R. (1984). Assessment of preschool handicapped children. Educational Psychologist, 19(3), 172–179.
7.
Fleisher, L.S., & Jenkins, J.R. (1983). The effect of word-and-comprehension-emphasis instruction on reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6(2), 146–154.
8.
Harbin, G.L., Gallagher, J.J., & Terry, D.V. (1991). Defining the eligible population: Policy issues and challenges. Journal of Early Intervention, 15(1), 13–20.
9.
Hartman, D.P. (1977). Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 103–116.
10.
Johnson, L.J. (1986). Factors that influence skill acquisition of practicum students during a field-based experience. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9(3), 89–103.
11.
Johnson, L.J., & Heal, L. (1987). Developing a minimum level of interrater agreement. Capstone Journal of Education, 7, 51–64.
12.
Johnson, L.J., & Lewman, B. (1986). The educational value of children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11(10), 87–93.
13.
Johnson, L.J., & Lewman, B. (1990). Parent perceptions of the talents of young gifted boys and girls. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(2), 176–188.
14.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs.New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Mastropieri, M. (1986). Introduction to special education textbooks: What they say about the efficacy of early intervention. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11(11), 59–66.
17.
Odom, S., & Shuster, S. (1986). Naturalistic inquiry and the assessment of young handicapped children and their families. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6, 68–82.
18.
Patton, M. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Patton, M. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Reynolds, J. (1983). Content analysis in the classroom: A specialized form of reading. Reading Improvement, 20(2), 111–113.
21.
Reynolds, J. & Wootton, L. (1988). Educational trends: Impact on schooling. Contemporary Education, 60(1), 6–11.
22.
Salisbury, C., Britzman, D., & Kang, J. (1989). Using qualitative methods to assess the social-communicative competence of young handicapped children. Journal of Early Intervention, 13(2), 153–164.
23.
Shonkoff, J.P. (1983). The limitations of normative assessments of high risk infants. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3(1), 29–43.
24.
Williamson, J.B., Karp, D.A., Dalphin, J.R., & Gray, P.S. (1982). The research craft: An introduction to social research methods.Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
