The present study investigated the measurement integrity of data collected using the Family Needs Survey (FNS). The data provided by 53 mothers of children with disabilities were subject to both classical test theory analyses and to factor analysis. The areas that the mothers considered “definite” needs were also compared with similar analyses conducted in a previous study. Results suggest that the FNS yields reasonably valid data regarding family needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, D.B. (1988). Assessing needs of families with handicapped infants. Journal of Special Education, 22, 117–127.
2.
Bailey, D.B., Blasco, P.M., & Simeonsson, R.J. (1992). Needs expressed by mothers and fathers of young children with disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 1–10.
3.
Bailey, D.B., & Simeonsson, R.J. (1988). Assessing needs of families with handicapped infants. Journal of Special Education, 22, 117–127.
Huntington, G.S. (1988). Assessing child characteristics that influence family functioning. In D.B. Bailey & R.J. Simeonsson (Eds.), Family assessment in early intervention (pp. 45–64). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
8.
Robinson, C.C., Rosenberg, S.A., & Beckman, P.J. (1988). Parent involvement in early childhood special education. In J. Jordon, J. Gallagher, & M. Karnes (Eds.), Early childhood special education: Birth to three (pp. 110–127). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
9.
Turnbull, A.P., Summers, J.A., & Brotherson, M.J. (1984). Working with families with disabled members: A family systems approach. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, The Research and Training Center on Independent Living, Lawrence, KS.
10.
Vogel, E.F., & Bell, N.W. (1968). The emotionally disturbed child as the family scapegoat. In N.W. Bell, & E.F. Vogel (Eds.), A modern introduction to the family (rev. ed., pp. 412–427). New York: Free Press.
11.
Weissbourd, B. (1988). The maturing family support movement: Shaping practice and policy for the '90s. Family Resource Coalition Report, No. 3, 2–3.
