Using Value-Added Analysis to Examine Short-Term Effects of Early Intervention

Abstract

This study examined the short-term effects of early intevention on 489 children who began special education services under the age of 5 years. Program effects were determined by comparing observed growth to expected growth through the use of a statistical technique called “value. added analysis.” The findings indicate that the children made developmental gains in their first program year beyond that predicted by maturation alone. Program effects were documented in a variety of skill areas for children classified as language impaired and children classified as multi-handicapped. For children classified as speech impaired, benefits were found in the cognitive domain only. This study can serve as an analytic model for others who must evaluate programs without manipulating treatments or using control groups.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bryk, A.S. , Strenio, J.F. , & Weisberg, H.I. (1980). A method for estimating treatment effects when individuals are growing. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5, 5–34.

Bryk, A.S. , & Weisberg, H.L. (1976). Value-added analysis: A dynamic approach to the estimation of treatment effects. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 127–155.

Casto, G. , & Mastropieri, M.A. (1986). The efficacy of early intervention programs: A meta analysis. Exceptional Children, 52, 417–424.

Edgar, E. , Heggelund, M. , & Fischer, M. (1988). A longitudinal study of graduates of special education preschools Educational placement after preschool. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 98(3), 61–74.

Guralnick, M. (1988). Efficacy research in early childhood intervention programs. In S. Odom & M. Karnes (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and young children with handicaps: An empirical base (pp. 75–88). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Hauser-Cram, P. , Upshur, C.C. , Krauss, M.W. , & Shonkoff, J.P. (1988). Implications of Public Law 99–457 for early intervention services for infants and toddlers with disabilities. Social Policy Report. Washington, DC: Society for Research in Child Development.

Hebbeler, K. (1985, April). Approach of the Preschool Evaluation Project to measuring the effectiveness of early intervention. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Anaheim, CA. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 259 485)

Markowitz, J. , & Larson, J. (1988). A longitudinal study of children in preschool special education programs. Rockville, MD: Montgomery County Public Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 314 903)

Meisels, S.J. (1985). The efficacy of early intervention: Why are we still asking this question? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(2), 1–11.

10.

Newborg, J. , Stock, J.R. , Wnek, L. , Guidubaldi, J. , & Svinicki, J. (1984). The Battelle Developmental Inventory. Allen, TX: DLM/Teaching Resources.

11.

Odom, S. , & Warren, S. (1988). Early childhood special education in the year 2000. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 2, 263–273.

12.

Perlman, C.L. (1982, March). Critical factors in applying the value-added model: A Monte Carlo study. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

13.

Rosenberg, S.A. , Robinson, C.C. , Finkler, D. , & Rose, J.S. (1987). An empirical comparison of formulas evaluating early intervention program impact on development. Exceptional Children, 54, 213–219.

14.

Shonkoff, J.P. , Hauser-Cram, P. , Krauss, M. , & Upshur, C.C. (1988). Early intervention efficacy research: What have we learned and where do we go from here? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 8(1), 81–93.

15.

Wolery, M. , & Bailey, D.B. (1984). Alternatives to impact evaluations: Suggestions for program evaluation in early intervention. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 9, 27–36.