Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Griffiths' Mental Development Scales have been recommended for use in diagnostic assessment with infants and toddlers with special needs. The Griffiths' scales are British in origin, were developed in 1950, and cover five areas of infant development. This study compared results of Griffiths assessments with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the Battelle Developmental Inventory for a population of 30 children under 24 months of age. All children had been referred to an early intervention program. While the Griffiths correlated well with the two comparison measures, age equivalents obtained on the Griffiths were considerably higher than those obtained from the Bayley and the Battelle. The authors suggest that the Griffiths be restandardized on an American population of infants to increase its usefulness as a diagnostic instrument for early intervention programs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.

Bailey, D. , & Brochin, A. (1989). Tests and test development. In D. Bailey & M. Wolery (Eds.), Assessing infants and preschoolers with handicaps (pp. 22–46). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley Scales of Infant Development. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

Beail, N. (1985). A comparative study of profoundly multiply handicapped children's scores on the Bayley and Griffiths' developmental scales. Child: Care, Health and Development, 11, 31–36.

Campbell, S. , Siegel, E. , Parr, C. , & Ramsey, C. (1986). Evidence for the need to renorm the Bayley Scales of Infant Development based on performance of a population-based sample of 12-month-old infants. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6(2), 83–96.

Garwood, S.G. , & Sheehan, R. (1989). Designing a comprehensive early intervention system: The challenge of Public Law 99–457. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Green, L. (1970). Manual for scoring socioeco-nomic status for research on health behavior. Public Health Reports, 85(a), 815–827.

Griffiths, R. (1954). The abilities of babies. High Wycombe, Great Britain: Cournswood House.

Griffiths, R. (1970). The abilities of young children. High Wycombe, Great Britain: Cournswood House.

10.

Hanson, R. , & Smith, J. (1987). Achievement of young children on items of the Griffiths: 1980 compared with 1960. Child: Care, Health & Development, 13, 181–195.

11.

Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

12.

Knobloch, H. , Stevens, F. , & Malone, A.F. (1980). Manual of developmental diagnosis. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.

13.

Langley, B. (1989). Assessing infant cognitive development. In D. Bailey & M. Wolery (Eds.), Assessing infants and preschoolers with handicaps (pp. 249–274). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

14.

McLean, M. , McCormick, K. , Bruder, M.B. , & Burdg, N. (1987). An investigation of the validity and reliability of the Battelle Developmental Inventory with a population of children younger than 30 months with identified handicapping conditions. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11, 238–246.

15.

Mott, S. , Fewell, R. , Lewis, M. , Meisels, S. , Shonkoff, J. , & Simeonsson, R. (1986). Methods for assessing child and family outcomes in early childhood special education programs: Some views from the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6(2), 1–15.

16.

Newborg, J. , Stock, J. , Wnek, L. , Guidubaldi, J. , & Svinicki, J. (1984). The Battelle Developmental Inventory: Examiner's manual. Dallas: DLM/Teaching Resources.

17.

Nie, N. (1983). SPSS-X. New York: McGraw Hill.

18.

Ramsay, M. , & Fitzhardinge, P.M. (1977). Complete study of two developmental scales: The Bayley and the Griffiths. Early Human Development, 1, 151–157.

19.

Simeonsson, R.J. (Ed.). (1986). Psychological and developmental assessment of special children. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Concurrent Validity of the Griffiths' Mental Development Scales with a Population of Children Under 24 Months

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References