The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of developmental questionnaires with a sample of at-risk mothers. Thirty-six mothers with infants between 4 and 30 months were randomly assigned to experimental or control condition. Mothers in the experimental group each completed one Infant Monitoring Questionnaire (IMQ) on their infants. Infants in both groups were assessed with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, and all mothers completed the Bayley Interview, an interview in which items from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development have been modified into a parent interview format. Mothers in the experimental group had scores on the Bayley Interview more in agreement with the professional-completed Bayley assessment of the infant than mothers who had not completed an IMQ (t = -1.81, p < .04). Correlations between scaled scores from the mother-completed Bayley Interview and the professional-completed Bayley assessment were high for the experimental group (r = .80) and were significantly different from the correlations for the contol group (r = .25). Validity, measured by the percentage of agreement between the infant's classification (i.e., normal or abnormal) based on the questionnaires completed by at-risk mothers and the classification based on the professionally administered standardized assessments of the infants, was also high (89%).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley Scales of Infant Development. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
2.
Bennett, F. (1987). The effectiveness of early intervention for infants at increased biologic risk. In M. Guralnick & F. Bennett (Eds.), The effectiveness of early intervention for at-risk and handicapped children (pp. 79–109). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
3.
Bricker, D, & Squires, J. (1989a). The effectiveness of screening at-risk infants: Infant Monitoring Questionnaires. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 9(3), 67–85.
4.
Bricker, D., & Squires, J. (1989b). A low-cost system using parents to monitor the development of at-risk infants. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 50–60.
5.
Bricker, D., Squires, J., Kaminski, R., & Mounts, L. (1988). The validity, reliability, and cost of a parent-completed questionnaire system to evaluate at-risk infants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 13, 55–68.
6.
Brinker, R., Frazier, W., Lancelot, B., & Norman, J. (1989). Identifying infants from the inner city for early intervention. Infants and Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 2(1), 49–58.
7.
Brinker, R., & Norman, J. (1987, March). Screening infants for developmental delays through a parent questionnaire provided in well-baby clinics. Paper presented at the Gatlinburg Conference on Research and Theory in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Gatlinburg, TN.
8.
Brown, L. (1986). Hunger in the U.S. Scientific American, 256(2), 37–41.
9.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power for analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Coplan, J. (1982). Parents' estimates of child's developmental level in high-risk population. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 136, 101–104.
11.
Dale, P., Bates, E., Reznick, J., & Morisset, C. (1989). The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at twenty months. Journal of Child Language, 16, 239–249.
12.
Donnelly, B., Doherty, J., Sheehan, R., & Whittemore, C. (1982, December). A comparison of maternal, paternal, and diagnostic evaluations of typical and atypical infants. Paper presented at HCEEP/DEC Conference, Washington, DC.
13.
Frankenburg, W., Fandal, A., & Thorton, S. (1987). Revision of the Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire. Journal of Pediatrics, 110, 653–657.
14.
Glass, G., & Hopkins, K. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Gradel, K. (1979). Comparison of maternal, educational, and diagnostic evaluation of handicapped infants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia.
16.
Gradel, K., Thompson, M., & Sheehan, R. (1981). Parental and professional agreement in early childhood assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1(2), 31–40.
17.
Graham, M., & Scott, K. (1988). The impact of definitions of high risk on services to infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 8(3), 23–38.
18.
Hagekull, B., Bohlin, G., & Lindhagen, K. (1984). Validity of parental reports. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 77–92.
19.
Hunt, J., & Paraskevopoulos, J. (1980). Children's psychological development as a function of the accuracy of their mothers' knowledge of their abilities. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 136, 285–298.
20.
Ireton, H., & Thwing, E. (1974). Minnesota Child Development Inventory. Minneapolis: Behavior Science Systems.
21.
Kitchen, W., Richards, A., Ryan, M., Ford, G., Lissenden, J., & Boyle, L. (1986). Improved outcome to two years of very low-birthweight infants: Fact or artifact?. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 28, 479–588.
22.
Knobloch, H., Stevens, F., & Malone, A. (1980). Manual of developmental diagnosis: The administration and interpretation of the revised Gesell and Amatruda Developmental and Neurological Examination. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.
23.
Knobloch, H., Stevens, F., Malone, A., Ellison, P., & Risemberg, H. (1979). The validity of parental reporting of infant development. Pediatrics, 63, 873–878.
24.
Lichtenstein, R., & Ireton, H. (1984). Preschool screening: Identifying young children with developmental and educational problems. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
25.
McDonough, S. (1985). Intervention programs for adolescent mothers and their offspring. In M. Frank (Ed.), Infant intervention programs: Truths and untruths (pp. 3–12). New York: Haworth Press.
26.
Meier, J. (1985). Definition, dynamics, and prevalence of assault against children: A multifactorial model. In J. Meier (Ed.), Assault against children (pp. 1–46). San Diego: College-Hill Press.
27.
National Center for Clinical Infant Programs (1986). Infants can't wait: The numbers. Washington, DC: Author.
28.
Neisworth, J., & Bagnato, S. (1987). Assessment in early childhood special education: A typology of dependent measures. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
29.
Sameroff, A. (1986). Environmental context of child development. Journal of Pediatrics, 109, 192–200.
30.
Schneider, J., Griffith, D., & Chasnoff, I. (1989). Infants exposed to cocaine in utero: Implications for developmental assessment and intervention. Infants and Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 2(1), 25–36.
31.
Self, P., & Horowitz, F. (1979). The behavioral assessment of the neonate: An overview. In J. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 126–164). New York: John Wiley.
32.
Sell, E. (1986). Outcome of very low birth weight infants. Clinics in Perinatology, 13, 451–459.
33.
Sexton, D., Miller, J., & Murdock, J. (1984). Correlates of parental-professional congruency scores in the assessment of young handicapped children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 8, 99–106.
34.
Squires, J., Nickel, R., & Bricker, D. (1990). Use of parent-completed developmental questionnaires for child-find and screening. Infants and Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 3(2), 46–57.
35.
Thorndike, R., Hagen, E., & Sattler, J. (1985). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.
36.
Uzgiris, T., & Hunt, J. (1975). Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of psychological development. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
37.
Worobey, J. (1986). Convergence among assessments of temperament in the first month. Child Development, 57, 45–55.
