This study examined the effects of several procedures on the social and supportive interactions of two preschoolers with handicaps and their socially competent peers. An alternating individual and group-oriented reinforcement contingency produced equal increases in the target children's interactions with peers. However, neither procedure generated consistent levels of supportive peer behaviors. Following a baseline phase where social and supportive interactions decreased to lower levels, two socially competent children were taught to deliver high levels of supportive prompts to their peers during a dramatic play activity (e.g., “Ask [target child] to come and join our picnic”). Results indicated that peers complied with these statements by increasing the frequency of social behaviors directed to the target children. A final interdependent group contingency condition maintained both social and supportive interactions at high levels. These results are discussed with regard to the efficacy of group-oriented contingencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, R.N., Corbitt, T.F., & Smigel, J. (1976). The effects of individual and group consequences on school attendance and curfew violations with predelinquent adolescents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 221–226.
2.
Asher, S.R., & Taylor, A.R. (1981). Social outcomes of mainstreaming: Sociometric assessment and beyond. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1, 13–30.
3.
Axelrod, S., & Paluska, J. (1975). A component analysis of the effects of a classroom spelling program. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 277–282). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Baer, D.M., & Wolf, M.M. (1970). The entry into natural communities of reinforcement. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 319–324). Glenwood, IL: Scott Foresman.
5.
Barton, E.J. (1986). Modification of children's pro-social behavior. In P. Strain, M.J. Guralnick, & H.M. Walker (Eds.), Children's social behavior: Development, assessment, and modification (pp. 331–372). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
6.
Foster, S.L., & Ritchey, W.L. (1979). Issues in the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 625–638.
7.
Fowler, S.A., Dougherty, B.S., Kirby, K., & Kohler, F.W. (1986). Role reversals: An analysis of therapeutic effects achieved with disruptive boys during their appointments as peer monitors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 437–444.
8.
Frankosky, R.J., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1978). Individual and group contingencies and collateral social behavior. Behavior Therapy, 9, 313–327.
9.
Greenwood, C.R., & Hops, H. (1981). Group-oriented contingencies and peer behavior change. In P.S. Strain (Ed.), The utilization of classroom peers as behavior change agents (pp. 189–259). New York: Plenum Press.
10.
Gresham, F.M., & Gresham, G.N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. The Journal of Special Education, 1, 101–110.
11.
Guralnick, M.J. (1981). The efficacy of integrating handicapped children in early intervention settings: Research implications. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1(1) 57–71.
12.
Hartup, W.W. (1983). Peer relations. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 103–196). New York: John Wiley.
13.
Kohler, F.W. (1986). Review and evaluation of a behavior change technology: Peer-mediated interventions. Unpublished review paper. University of Kansas, Department of Human Development and Family Life, Lawrence, KS.
14.
Kohler, F.W., & Fowler, S.A. (1985). Training prosocial behaviors to young children: An analysis of reciprocity with untrained peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 187–200.
15.
Odom, S.L., Kohler, F.W., & Strain, P.S. (1987). Teaching strategies for promoting social interaction skills. Unpublished manuscript. University of Pittsburgh, Early Childhood Research Institute, Pittsburgh.
16.
Paine, S.C., Hops, H., Walker, H.M., Greenwood, C.R., Fleischman, D.H., & Guild, J.J. (1982). Repeated treatment effects: A study of maintaining behavior change in socially withdrawn children. Behavior Modification, 6, 171–199.
17.
Roff, M. (1961). Childhood social interaction and young adult bad conduct. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 333–337.
18.
Roff, M., Sells, B., & Golden, M.M. (1972). Social adjustment and personality adjustment in children. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
Speltz, M.L., Shimamura, J.W., & McReynolds, W.T. (1982). Procedural variations in group contingencies: Effects on children's academic and social behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 533–544.
20.
Strain, P.S., Guralnick, M.J., & Walker, H.M. (1986). Children's social behavior: Development, assessment, and modification. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21.
Strain, P.S., Kerr, M.M., & Ragland, E.U. (1981). The use of peer social initiations in the treatment of social withdrawal. In P.S. Strain (Ed.), The utilization of classroom peers as behavior change agents (pp. 101–128). New York: Plenum Press.
22.
Strain, P.S., Shores, R.E., & Timm, M.A. (1977). Effects of peer social initiations of the behavior of withdrawn preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 289–298.
23.
Van Houten, R., & Van Houten, J. (1977). The performance feedback system in the special education classroom: An analysis of public posting and peer comments. Behavior Therapy, 8, 366–376.
24.
Wilson, S.H., & Williams, R.L. (1973). The effects of group contingencies on first graders' academic and social behaviors. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 110–117.
