Abt Associates. (1977). Education as experimentation: A planned variation model (Vol. 4A). Cambridge, MA: Author.
2.
Casto, G., & Lewis, A.C. (1984). Parent involvement in infant and preschool programs . Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 9, 49-56.
3.
Casto, G., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1986a). The efficacy of early intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children , 52, 417-424.
4.
Casto, G., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1986b). Much ado about nothing: A reply to Dunst and Snyder. Exceptional Children, 53, 277-279.
5.
Casto, G., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1986c). Strain and Smith do protest too much: A response. Exceptional Children, 53, 266-268.
6.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
7.
Cook, T., & Leviton, L. (1980). Reviewing the literature: A comparison of traditional methods with meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 48, 449-472.
8.
Cooper, H.H. (1979). Statistically combining independent studies: A meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 131.146 .
9.
Dunst, C.J., & Snyder, S.W. (1986). A critique of the Utah State University early intervention meta-analysis research. Exceptional Children , 53, 269-276.
10.
Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research . Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
11.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
12.
Green, B., & Hall, J. (1984). Quantitative methods for literature review. Annual Review of Psychology, 35,37-53.
13.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkins, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
14.
Jackson, G.B. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 50, 438-460.
15.
Light, R.J., & Pillemer, D.B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge: Harvard Universitv Press.
16.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer" problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
17.
Rossi, P., & Wright, S. (1977). Evaluation research: An assessment of theory, practice, and politics. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 5-52.
18.
Salzberg, C.L., Strain, P.S., & Baer, D.M. (1987). Meta-analysis for single-subject research: When does it clarify, when does it obscure?Remedial and Special Education, 8, 43-48.
19.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education , 8, 24-33.
20.
Slavin, R.E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analysis and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 16, 5-11.
21.
Snyder, S., & Sheehan, R. (1983). Integrating research in early childhood special education: The use of meta-analysis. Diagnostique, 9, 12-25.
22.
Strain, P. (1981). Conceptual and methodological issues in efficacy research with behaviorally disordered children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 4, 111-124.
23.
Strain, P., & Smith, B.J. (1986). A counter-interpretation of early intervention effects: A response to Casto and Mastropieri. Exceptional Children, 53, 260-265.
24.
Swan, W. (1981). Efficacy studies in early childhood special education: An overview. Joumal of the Division for Early Childhood, 4, 1-4.
25.
Tingey, C. (1986). Early intervention: Learning what works. The Exceptional Parent, 16, 32-37.
26.
White, K.R. (1985-86). Efficacy of early intervention. Journal of Special Education, 19, 401-416.
27.
White, K.R. (1987). Some comments concerning "The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research." Remedial and Special Education , 8, 34-39.
28.
White, K.R., Bush, D.W., & Casto, G.C. (1985-86). Learning from reviews of early intervention . Journal of Special Education, 19, 418-428.
29.
White, K.R., & Casto, G. (1985). An integrative review of early intervention efficacy studies with at-risk children: Implications for the handicapped. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 7-31.
30.
Wolf, F.M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.