Caregivers are critical partners in early intervention service delivery; therefore, it is essential to ensure that early intervention practitioners (EIPs) have sufficient training in family-centered strategies to assist families with reaching targeted family and child outcomes. The triadic strategies from the Parents Interacting With Infants (PIWI) framework comprise a set of six practitioner strategies that align with family-centered caregiver coaching practices. For this mixed methods study, we used single-case research design to investigate a virtual training and coaching program for EIPs to increase their use of triadic strategies with caregivers during teleintervention sessions. We also conducted interviews to understand the experiences of EIPs and families with triadic strategy use. Results suggest practitioners demonstrated modest increases in strategy implementation, with marked decreases in directive strategy use. Participants described experiences with strategy use as well as factors potentially influencing implementation. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
AshburnerJ.VickerstaffS.BeetgeJ.CopleyJ. (2016). Remote versus face-to-face delivery of early intervention programs for children with autism spectrum disorders: Perceptions of rural families and service providers. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.11.011
2.
BanerjeeR.LucknerJ. (2014). Training needs of early childhood professionals who work with children and families who are culturally and linguistically diverse. Infants & Young Children, 27(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000000
3.
BartonE. E.PokorskiE. A.GossettS.SweeneyE.QiuJ.ChoiG. (2018). The use of email to coach early childhood teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(3), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118760314
4.
BirtL.ScottS.CaversD.CampbellC.WalterF. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
5.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
BrownJ. A.WoodsJ. J. (2015). Effects of a triadic parent-implemented home-based communication intervention for toddlers. Journal of Early Intervention, , 37(1), 44–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815115589350
8.
BruderM. B. (2010). Early childhood intervention: A promise to children and families for their future. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 339–355.
9.
BruderM. B.DunstC. J.WilsonC.StaytonV. (2013). Predictors of confidence and competence among early childhood interventionists. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2013.816806
10.
CorrC.SnodgrassM. R.GreeneJ. C.MeadanH.SantosR. M. (2020). Mixed methods in early childhood special education research: Purposes, challenges, and guidance. Journal of Early Intervention, 42(1), 20–30.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
13.
de GreefM.van HattumM. J.GrangerK. L.McLeodB. D.PijnenburgH. M.ScholteR. H. (2018). Predictors of parent-professional alliance in home-based parenting support. Children and Youth Services Review, 89, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.04.028
DouglasS.MeadanH.KammesR. (2020). Early interventionists’ caregiver coaching: A mixed methods approach exploring experiences and practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 40(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419829899
16.
DunstC. J.BruderM. B.Espe-SherwindtM. (2014). Family capacity-building in early childhood intervention: Do context and setting matter?School Community Journal, 24(1), 37–48.
17.
DunstC. J.Espe-SherwindtM. (2016). Family-centered practices in early childhood intervention. In ReichowB.BoydB. A.BartonE. E.OdomS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 37–55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28492-7_3
18.
DunstC. J.KassowD. Z. (2008). Caregiver sensitivity, contingent social responsiveness, and secure infant attachment. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 5(1), 40–56.
19.
FettersM. D. (2019). Writing a mixed methods article using the hourglass design model. In IvankovaN.ClarkV. Plano (Eds.), The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, conducting, and publishing mixed methods project (pp. 253–269). Sage.
20.
FettigA.BartonE. E.CarterA.EisenhowerA. (2016). Using e-coaching to support an early intervention provider’s implementation of a functional assessment-based intervention. Infants & Young Children, 29(2), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000058
21.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature [Florida Mental Health Institute Publication #231]. National Implementation Research Network, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.
22.
FriedmanM.WoodsJ.SalisburyC. (2012). Caregiver coaching strategies for early intervention providers: Moving toward operational definitions. Infants & Young Children, 25(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e31823d8f12
23.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry (Vol. 9). John Wiley & Sons.
24.
Hughes-BeldingK.PetersonC. A.Clucas WalterM.RoweN.FanL.DooleyL. J.SteffensmeierC.WangW.BaoJ.GoodmanK. (2019). Quality home visits: Activities to promote meaningful interactions. Infant Mental Health Journal, 40(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21779
KellyM. B. (1977). A review of the observational data-collection and reliability procedures reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-97
27.
KyzarK. B.ChiuC.KempP.AlderseyH. M.TurnbullA. P.LindemanD. P. (2014). Feasibility of an online professional development program for early intervention practitioners. Infants & Young Children, 27(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000007
28.
LaneJ. D.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Using interval-based systems to measure behavior in early childhood special education and early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121414524063
29.
LedfordJ. R.BartonE. E.SeveriniK. E.ZimmermanK. N. (2019). A primer on single-case research designs: Contemporary use and analysis. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 124(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-124.1.35
30.
MarturanaE.WoodsJ. (2012). Technology-supported performance-based feedback for early intervention home visiting. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411434935
31.
McCollumJ.GoolerF.ApplD.YatesT. (2001). PIWI: Enhancing parent-child inter-action as a foundation for early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 14(1), 34–45.
32.
McCollumJ. A.YatesT. J. (1994). Dyad as focus, triad as means: A family-centered approach to supporting parent-child interactions. Infants & Young Children, 6(4), 54–63.
33.
McWilliamR. A. (2012). Implementing and preparing for home visits. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(4), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411426488
34.
MeadanH.ChungM. Y.SandsM. M.SnodgrassM. R. (2020). The Cascading Coaching Model for supporting service providers, caregivers, and children. The Journal of Special Education, 54(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919884070
35.
MeadanH.SnodgrassM. R.MeyerL. E.FisherK. W.ChungM. Y.HalleJ. W. (2016). Internet-based parent-implemented intervention for young children with autism: A pilot study. Journal of Early Intervention, 38(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116630327
36.
Moran-EllisJ.AlexanderV. D.CroninA.DickinsonM.FieldingJ.SleneyJ.ThomasH. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058870
37.
MovahedazarhoulighS. (2021). Parent-implemented interventions and family-centered service delivery approaches in early intervention and early childhood special education. Early Child Development and Care, 191(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2019.1603148
38.
OnghenaP.MaesB.HeyvaertM. (2019). Mixed methods single case research: State of the art and future directions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818789530
39.
PhillipsD. A.ShonkoffJ. P. (Eds.) (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. National Academies Press.
40.
PooleM. E.FettigA.McKeeR. A.GauvreauA. N. (2022). Inside the virtual visit: Using tele-intervention to support families in early intervention. Young Exceptional Children, 25(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250620948061
41.
RaikesH.GreenB.AtwaterJ.KiskerE.ConstantineJ.Chazan-CohenR. (2006). Involvement in early head start home visiting services: Demographic predictors and relations to child and parent outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.01.006
42.
RamosS.RamosJ. A. (2019). Process of change and effectiveness of family constellations: A mixed methods single case study on depression. The Family Journal, 27(4), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480719868706
43.
RoggmanL. A.PetersonC. A.Chazan-CohenR.IspaJ. B.DeckerK.Hughes-BeldingK.CookG. A.VallottonC. D. (2016). Preparing home visitors to partner with families of infants and toddlers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 37(4), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2016.1241965
44.
RomanoM.SchnurrM. (2022). Mind the gap: Strategies to bridge the research-to-practice divide in early intervention caregiver coaching practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 42(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419899163
45.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
46.
SalisburyC. L.CushingL. S. (2013). Comparison of triadic and provider-led intervention practices in early intervention home visits. Infants & Young Children, 26(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182736fc0
47.
SchiaritiV.McWilliamR. (2021). Crisis brings innovative strategies: Collaborative empathic teleintervention for children with disabilities during the COVID-19 lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1749–1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041749
48.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415594925
49.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J.HambyD. W. (2010). Influences of family-systems intervention practices on parent-child interactions and child development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121410364250
50.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J.HambyD. W.O’herinC. E. (2009). Characteristics and consequences of adult learning methods and strategies. Research Brief, 3(1), 1–33.
WilliamsC.OstroskyM. (2020). What about MY TOYS? Common questions about using a bagless approach in early intervention. Young Exceptional Children, 23(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250619829739
53.
WolfeK.BartonE. E.MeadanH. (2019). Systematic protocols for the visual analysis of single-case research data. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(2), 491–502.
54.
YatesT. (2011). Parents interacting with infants: Strengthening parent-child relationships to support social and emotional development. Zero to Three Journal, 32(2), 25–29.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
