Many factors influence the quality of preschool inclusion classrooms. A total of 35 inclusive preschool teachers across a variety of organizational contexts completed a questionnaire containing open-ended and closed-ended questions to understand their beliefs (i.e., self-efficacy, attitudes, and concerns) regarding inclusion. In addition, trained inclusive classroom profile (ICP) users observed the inclusive classrooms to collect ratings of inclusive quality. The purpose of this convergent mixed-methods study is to share teachers’ beliefs and observed practices to advance the field’s knowledge of preschool inclusion implementation. Results showed that teachers perceived a high level of self-efficacy toward including children with disabilities and positive attitudes toward the benefits of inclusion yet expressed the need for training and support. Observations of inclusive practices using the ICP revealed that the mean inclusive quality item scores ranged from minimal to good. Based on the results, implications for research and practice are discussed.
AltheideD. L.JohnsonJ. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485–499). Sage.
BaileyJ. (2004). The validation of a scale to measure school principals’ attitudes toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools. Australian Psychologist, 39, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060410001660371
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–212.
5.
BartonE.SmithB. (2015). Advancing high quality preschool inclusion: A discussion and recommendations for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415583048
6.
BradshawL.MundiaL. (2006). Attitudes to and concerns about inclusive education: Bruneian in-service and preservice teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 21, 35–41.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
8.
BrunsD. A.MogharrebanC. C. (2007). The gap between beliefs and practices: Early childhood practitioners’ perceptions about inclusion. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21, 229–241.
CorrC.SnodgrassM. R.GreeneJ. C.MeadanH.SantosR. M. (2020). Mixed methods in early childhood special education research: Purposes, challenges, and guidance. Journal of Early Intervention, 42(1), 20–30.
11.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
12.
CrossA. F.TraubE. K.Hutter-PishgahiL.SheltonG. (2004). Elements of successful inclusion for children with significant disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24(3), 169–183.
13.
D’AgostinoS.DouglasS. (2020). Early childhood educators’ perceptions of inclusion for children with autism spectrum disorder. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(4), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01108-7
14.
D’AgostinoS.DouglasS. (2021). Preparation experiences of pre-service inclusive preschool teachers: A qualitative metasynthesis. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 43(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2021.1902435
15.
DamschroderL.AronD.KeithR.KirshS.AlexanderJ.LoweryJ. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 1–15.
EndersC. K. (2003). Using the expectation maximization algorithm to estimate coefficient alpha for scales with item-level missing data. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.322
20.
EspositoM. C.GuarinoA. J.CaywoodK. D. (2007). Perceived teacher efficacy beliefs for the inclusion of the student with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 265–272.
21.
FrantzR.DouglasS.MeadanH.SandsM.BhanaN.D’AgostinoS. (2020). Exploring the professional development needs of early childhood paraeducators and supervising teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 42, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121420921237
22.
GageN. A.WhitfordD. K.KatsiyannisA.AdamsS.JasperA. (2019). National analysis of the disciplinary exclusion of black students with and without disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 1754–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01407-7
23.
HallG. E.HordS. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Suny Press.
24.
JonesC. R.RatcliffN. J.SheehanH.HuntG. H. (2012). An analysis of teachers’ and paraeducators’ roles and responsibilities with implications for professional development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(1), 19–24.
25.
LeathermanJ. M.NiemeyerJ. A. (2005). Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion: Factors influencing classroom practice. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901020590918979
26.
LoveH. R. (2021). Administrators as heterotopia architects: Supporting expansive possibilities of inclusive early childhood education. Young Exceptional Children, 24(3), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/10962506211018968
27.
LoveH. R.HornE. (2021). Definition, context, quality: Current issues in research examining high-quality inclusive education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 40, 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419846342
28.
MitchellL. C.HegdeA. V. (2007). Beliefs and practices of in-service preschool teachers in inclusive settings: Implications for personnel preparation. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 28(4), 353–366.
29.
MorganC. W.CheathamG. A. (2021). Rationale for change: Reconceptualizing inclusive early childhood education through practice. Young Exceptional Children, 24(3), 115–123.
30.
MuccioL. S.KiddJ. K.WhiteC. S.BurnsM. S. (2014). Head start instructional professionals’ inclusion perceptions and practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(1), 40–48.
31.
OdomS. L.BuysseV.SoukakouE. (2011). Inclusion for young children with disabilities: A quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111430094
32.
OdomS. L.ZercherC.LiS.MarquartJ. M.SandallS.BrownW. H. (2006). Social acceptance and rejection of preschool children with disabilities: A mixed-method analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 807–823.
33.
OkonofuaJ. A.EberhardtJ. L. (2015). Two strikes: Race and the disciplining of young students. Psychological Science, 26(5), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615570365
34.
SaldañaJ. (2021). Coding techniques for quantitative and mixed data. The Routledge Reviewer’s Guide to Mixed Methods Analysis, 151–160.
35.
SharmaU.DesaiI. (2002). Measuring concerns about integrated education in India. The Asia-pacific Journal on Disabilities, 5, 2–14.
36.
SharmaU.NuttalA. (2016). The impact of training on pre-service teacher attitudes, concerns, and efficacy towards inclusion. Asia-Pacific Journal of teacher education, 44(2), 142–155.
37.
SharmaU.SokalL. (2016). Can teachers’ self-reported efficacy, concerns, and attitudes toward inclusion scores predict their actual inclusive classroom practices?Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 40(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2015.14
38.
SoukakouE. P. (2007). Assessment of classroom quality in inclusive preschool settings: Development and validation of a new observation measure. University of Oxford.
39.
SoukakouE. P. (2012). Measuring quality in inclusive preschool classrooms: Development and validation of the inclusive classroom profile (ICP). Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 478–488.
40.
SoukakouE. P. (2016). The inclusive classroom profile (ICP) manual. Brookes Publishing.
41.
SoukakouE. P.WintonP. J.WestT. A.SiderisJ. H.RuckerL. M. (2014). Measuring the quality of inclusive practices: Findings from the inclusive classroom profile pilot. Journal of Early Intervention, 36, 223–240.
42.
Stanton-ChapmanT. L. (2015). Promoting positive peer interactions in the preschool classroom: The role and the responsibility of the teacher in supporting children’s sociodramatic play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(2), 99–107.
43.
StrainP. S.BoveyE. H. (2011). Randomized, controlled trial of the LEAP model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(3), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411408740
44.
TriandisH. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. John Wiley.
WahmanC. L.SteeleT.SteedE. A.PowersL. (2022). “No intervention, just straight suspension”: Family perspectives of suspension and expulsion. Children and Youth Services Review, 143, 106678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106678
50.
WaitollerF. R.ArtilesA. J. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 319–356. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483905
51.
WallsS. D. (2007). Early childhood preservice training and perceived teacher efficacy beliefs concerning the inclusion of young children with disabilities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Auburn University.
YuS. (2019). Head Start teachers’ attitudes and perceived competence toward inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 41(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118801372
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
