Personnel standards are the foundations for how states and nations approve a program, engage in systemic assessment, and provide effective professional development to its early childhood professionals. However, despite the extensive use of paraprofessionals in early intervention/early childhood special education programs, there is a lack of national- and state-level guidance for training paraprofessionals. This article presents the process followed for development and validation of statewide personnel standards for paraprofessionals who work in early intervention settings and the results of this validation study. The development and validation process for these new knowledge and skills competencies followed the process used by Division for Early Childhood and the Council for Exceptional Children for development and validation of personnel standards and K-12 special education paraeducator professional development standards. Challenges, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
BanerjeeR.RudeH. A. (2013). Using standards-based and evidence-based content in early childhood professional development. Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach, 3(2), 42-51.
2.
BinghamG.Hall-KenyonK.CulattaB. (2010). Systematic and engaging early literacy: Examining the effects of paraeducator implemented early literacy instruction. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 38-49.
3.
ChopraR.BanerjeeR.DiPalmaG.MerrillL.FergusonA. (2013). Colorado’s model for preparing paraprofessionals for rural early intervention programs. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 32(1), 20-28.
4.
ChopraR. V. (2009). Parent paraeducator collaboration in inclusive classrooms: Reality and issues in the context of students with disabilities. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
5.
ChopraR. V.FrenchN. K. (2004). Paraeducator relationships with parents of students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 240-251.
6.
CochranD. C.GallagherP. A.StaytonV. D.DinnebeilL.LifterK.ChandlerL. K.ChristensenK. (2012). Early childhood special education and early intervention personnel preparation standards of the Division for Early Childhood: Field validation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32, 38-51.
7.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2004). Parability: The CEC paraeducator standards workbook. Arlington, VA: Author.
8.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2009). What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines (6th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author. Available from http://www.cec-spec.org
9.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2010). CEC specialty areas studies board standards submission. Available from http://www.cec.spec.org
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
FrenchN. K. (2002). Managing paraeducators in your school: How to hire, train, and supervise non-certified staff. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
13.
FrenchN. K. (2003a). Administrators desk reference on paraeducators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14.
FrenchN. K. (2003b). Paraeducators in special education programs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 36(2), 1-16.
15.
GiangrecoM. F. (2013). Teacher assistant supports in inclusive schools: Research, practices and alternatives. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 37, 93-106. doi:10.1017/jse.2013.1
16.
HughesM. T.Valle-RiestraD. M. (2008). Responsibilities, preparedness, and job satisfaction of paraprofessionals working with young children with disabilities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16, 163-173.
17.
HysonM.BiggarH. (2005). NAEYC’s standards for early childhood professional preparation: Getting from here to there. In ZaslowM.Martinez-BeckI. (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 283-308). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
18.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (2003, September). Model standards for licensing general and special education teachers of students with disabilities: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
19.
KellegrewD. H.Pacifico-BantaJ.StewartK. (2008). Training early intervention assistants in California’s community colleges (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2008–No. 060). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
20.
KilloranJ.TemplemanT. P.PetersJ.UdellT. (2001). Identifying paraprofessional competencies for early intervention and early childhood special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(1), 68-73.
21.
LeedyP. D.OrmrodJ. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
22.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1999). Learning disabilities: Use of paraprofessionals. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 23-30.
24.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2009). Application for new grants under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education & Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education.
25.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2011). Application for new grants under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education & Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/programs/osepprep/2011-325n.doc
26.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CollinsK. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12, 281-316.
27.
SobelD. M.ChopraR. V.DiPalmaG. I. (2015). University and community college education programs partnering to enhance standards-based paraeducator training in the United States. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 16(1), 77-85.
28.
StaytonV. D. (2015). Preparation of early childhood special education for inclusive and interdisciplinary settings. Infants and Young Children, 28, 2113-2122.
