Both naturalistic communication and parent-implemented interventions are evidence-based practices for young children with disabilities, but demonstrations of effective methods for teaching parents to implement naturalistic interventions successfully with their children are still warranted. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a training and coaching program on parent implementation of naturalistic teaching strategies and on concomitant child communication skills using a telepractice service-delivery model (i.e., Internet-Based Parent-Implemented Communication Strategies [i-PiCS]). We found that parents learned to implement the targeted naturalistic teaching strategies with fidelity when, and only when, they were provided with training and coaching over the Internet. The parents’ implementation of these strategies also corresponded with positive changes in their children’s communication skills. The limitations and implications of this investigation are discussed.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
BartonE. E.FettigA. (2013). Parent-implemented interventions for young children with disabilities: A review of fidelity procedures. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 194-219. doi:10.1177/1053815113504625
3.
BlaiserK.EdwardsM.BehlD.MuñozK. (2012). Tele-intervention services at sound beginnings at Utah State University. Volta Review, 112, 365-372.
4.
BoydB. A.OdomS. L.HumphreysB. P.SamA. M. (2010). Infants and toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: Early identification and early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 32, 75-98.
5.
BruderM. (2010). Early childhood intervention: A promise to children and families for their future. Exceptional Children, 76, 339-355.
6.
CasonJ.BehlS.RingwaltS. (2012). Overview of states’ use of telehealth for the delivery of early intervention (IDEA Part C) services. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4, 39-46. doi:10.5195/ijt.2012.6105
ChungM. Y.SnodgrassM. R.MeadanH.AkamogluY. A.HalleJ. W. (2016). Understanding communication intervention for young children with autism and their parents: Exploring measurement decisions and confirmation bias. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabiltiies. doi:10.1007/s10882-015-9468-7
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
DunlapG.EsterT.LanghansS.FoxL. (2006). Functional communication training with toddlers in home environments. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 81-96. doi:10.1177/105381510602800201
11.
GuralnickM. (1998). The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
12.
HallamR. A.RousB.GroveJ.LoBiancoT. (2009). Level and intensity of early intervention services for infants and toddlers with disabilities: The impact of child, family, system, and community-level factors on service provision. Journal of Early Intervention, 31, 179-196. doi:10.1177/1053815109331914
13.
HancockT. B.KaiserA. P. (2002). The effects of trainer-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 39-54.
14.
HartB. (1985). Naturalistic language techniques. In WarrenS. F.Rogers-WarrenA. K. (Eds.), Teaching functional language: Generalization and maintenance of language skills (pp. 63-88). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
15.
HebbelerK.SpikerD.KahnL. (2012). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act’s early childhood programs: Powerful vision and pesky details. Topics in Early Childhood Education, 31, 199-207. doi:10.1177/0271121411429077
16.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
17.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. (2004). Pub. L. No. 108-446, §632, 118 Stat. 2744 (2004).
18.
JohnsonJ. L.BrownS.ChangC.NelsonD.MrazekS. (2011). The cost of serving infants and toddlers under part C. Infants & Young Children, 24, 101-113. doi:10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182014c97
19.
JoyceB. R.ShowersB. (2002). Student achievement through staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20.
KaiserA. P.HancockT. B.NietfeldJ. P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Early Education and Development, 11, 423-446.
21.
KasprzakC.HurthJ.RooneyR.GoodeS. E.DanaherJ. C.WhaleyK. T.. . . CateD. (2012). States’ accountability and progress in serving young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32, 151-163. doi:10.1177/0271121411408119
22.
KazdinA. E. (1979). Methodological and interpretive problems of single-case experimental designs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 629-642. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.629
23.
KelsoG.FiechtlB.OlsenS.RuleS. (2009). The feasibility of virtual home visits to provide early intervention: A pilot study. Infants & Young Children, 22, 332-340.
24.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case design technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
25.
Lieberman-BetzR. G. (2015). A systematic review of fidelity of implementation in parent-mediated early communication intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35, 15-27. doi:10.1177/0271121414557282
26.
MeadanH.AngellM. E.StonerJ. B.DaczewitzM. E. (2014). Parent-implemented social-pragmatic communication intervention: A pilot study. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29, 95-110. doi:10.1177/1088357613517504
27.
MeadanH.DaczewitzM. (2015). Internet-based intervention training for parents of young children with disabilities: A promising service-delivery model. Early Child Development and Care, 185, 155-169. doi:10.1080/03004430.2014.908866
28.
MeadanH.MeyerL. E.SnodgrassM. R.HalleJ. W. (2013). Coaching parents of young children with Autism in rural areas using Internet-based technologies: A pilot program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 32(3), 3-10.
29.
MeadanH.StonerJ. B.AngellM. E.DaczewitzM. E.CheemaJ.RuguttJ. K. (2014). Do you see a difference? Evaluating outcomes of a parent-implemented intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 415-430. doi:10.1007/s10882-014-9376-2
30.
OdomS. L.Collet-KlingenbergL.RogersS. J.HattonD. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children with youth and autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54, 275-282. doi:10.1080/10459881003785506
31.
OlsenS.FiechtlB.RuleS. (2012). An evaluation of virtual home visits in early intervention: Feasibility of “virtual intervention.”The Volta Review, 112, 267-281.
32.
OstroskyM. M.KaiserA. P. (1991). Preschool classroom environments that promote communication. Teaching Exceptional Children, 23(4), 7-10.
33.
PetersonC.MayerL.SummersJ.LuzeG. (2010). Meeting needs of young children at risk for or having a disability. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 509-517. doi:10.1007/s10643-010-0375-3
34.
PickeringL. E.Joseph WalshE. (2011). Using videoconferencing technology to enhance classroom observation methodology for the instruction of preservice early childhood professionals. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27, 99-108.
35.
RobertsM. Y.KaiserA. P. (2011). The effectiveness of parent-implemented language interventions: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 180-199. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0055)
36.
RobertsM. Y.KaiserA. P.WolfeK. M.BryantJ. D.SpidaleriA. (2014). The effects of the teach model-coach-review intervention on caregiver use of language support strategies and children’s expressive language skills. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1851-1869.
37.
RockM. L.ZigmondN. P.GreggM.GableR. A. (2011). The power of virtual coaching. Educational Leadership, 69(2), 42-48.
38.
SchalockR. L.KeithK. D.VerdugoM. A.GomezL. E. (2011). Quality of life model development and use in the field of intellectual disability. In KoberR. (Ed.), Enhancing the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities: From theory to practice (pp. 17-32). New York, NY: Springer.
39.
SontagJ. C.SchactR. M. (1993). Family diversity patterns of service in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 1-14.
40.
SquiresJ.BrickerD.TwomblyE.YockelsonS.DavisM. S.YoungheeK. (2002). Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social Emotional (ASQ:SE). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
41.
StaerkelF. J.SpiekerS. (2006). Unstable housing—A significant challenge for home visiting programs: An early head start case example. Journal of Family Social Work, 10, 61-76.
42.
StonerJ. B.MeadanH.AngellM. E.DaczewitzM. (2012). Evaluation of the Parent-implemented Communication Strategies (PiCS) project using the Multiattribute Utility (MAU) approach. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24, 57-73. doi:10.1007/s11092-011-916-0
VismaraL. A.YoungG. S.StahmerA. C.GriffithE. M.RogersS. J. (2009). Dissemination of evidence-based practice: Can we train therapists from a distance?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1636-1651.
45.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.. . . SchultzT. R. (2013). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.
46.
ZimmermanI. L.SteinerV. G.PondR. E. (2012). Preschool Language Scale (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
