A systematic analysis was conducted of measurement and reporting practices related to procedural fidelity in single-case research for the past 30 years. Previous reviews of fidelity primarily reported whether fidelity data were collected by authors; these reviews reported that collection was variable, but low across journals and over time. Results of this review indicate that fidelity data collection was variable across journals, but increasing over time. However, despite previous recommendations for doing so, authors of many studies failed to report when data were collected, for what behaviors, and for which participants. Recommendations include continued fidelity measurement, increased breadth of measurement, increased precision of measurement, and explicit reporting of fidelity data and measurement procedures by authors.
ArmstrongK. J.EhrhardtK. E.CoolR. T.PolingA. (1997). Social validity and treatment integrity data: Reporting in articles published in the Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 1991-1995. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 359-367.
2.
BaerD. M.WolfM. M.RisleyT. R. (1968). Some current dimension of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.
3.
BillingsleyF.WhiteO. R.MunsonR. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
4.
CookT. (1985). Post-positivist critical multiplism. In ShotlandR. L.MarksM. M. (Eds.), Social science and social policy (pp. 21-62). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
5.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6.
DaneA. V.SchneiderB. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control?Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23-45.
7.
DusenburyL.BranniganR.FalcoM.HansenW. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Heath Education Research, 18, 237-256.
8.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
GreenwoodC. R. (2009). Treatment integrity: Revisiting some big ideas. School Psychology Review, 38, 547-553.
10.
GreshamF. M.GansleK. A.NoelleG. H. (1993). Treatment integrity in applied behavior analysis with children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 257-263.
11.
GreshamF. M. (2009). Evolution of the treatment integrity concept: Current status and future directions. School Psychology Review, 38, 533-540.
12.
GriffithA. K.HurleyK. D.HagamanJ. L. (2009). Treatment integrity of literacy interventions for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 245-255.
13.
HalleJ. (1998). Fidelity: A crucial question in translating research to practice. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 294-296.
14.
HammondD.GastD. L. (2010). Descriptive analysis of single subject research design: 1983-2007. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 187-202.
15.
HolcombeA.WoleryM.SnyderE. (1994). Effects of two levels of procedural fidelity with constant time delay on children’s learning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 49-73.
16.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.ElamK. E.WoleryM. (2012). Using response prompting procedures during small group direct instruction: Outcomes and procedural variations. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 413-434.
17.
LeLaurinK.WoleryM. (1992). Research standards in early intervention: Defining, describing, and measuring the independent variable. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 275-287.
18.
LoganK. R.JacobsH. A.GastD. L.MurrayA. S.DainoK.SkalaC. (1998). The impact of typical peers on the perceived happiness of students with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 23, 309-318.
19.
McIntyreL. L.GreshamF. M.DiGennaroF.ReedD. D. (2007). Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991-2005. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 659-672.
20.
MoncherF. J.PrinzR. J. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247-266.
21.
OdomS. L.StrainP. S. (2002). Evidence-based practice in early intervention/early childhood special education: Single-subject design research. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 151-160.
22.
PerepletchikovaF. (2011). On the topic of treatment integrity. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 18, 148-153.
23.
PetersonC. A.McConnellS. R. (1993). Factors affecting the impact of social interaction skills interventions in early childhood special education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13, 38-56.
24.
PetersonC. A.McConnellS. R. (1996). Factors related to intervention integrity and child outcome in social skills interventions. Journal of Early Intervention, 20, 146-164.
25.
PetersonL.HornerA. L.WonderlichS. A. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477-492.
26.
RobertsM. Y.KaiserA. P. (2011). The effectiveness of parent-implemented language interventions: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 180-199.
27.
SanettiL. M. H.KratochwillT. R. (2009).Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445-459.
28.
SanettiL. M. H.GritterK. L.DobeyL. M. (2011). Treatment integrity of interventions with children in the school psychology literature from 1995 to 2008. School Psychology Review, 40, 72-84.
29.
SchlosserR. W. (2002). On the important of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 36-44.
30.
SnellM. E.BradyN.McLeanL.OgletreeB. T.SiegelE.SylvesterL.SevcikR. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 264-380.
31.
StrainP. S.McConnellS. R.CartaJ. J.FowlerS. A.NeisworthJ. T.WoleryM. (1992). Behaviorism in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 121-141.
32.
WheelerJ. J.BaggettB. A.FoxJ.BlevinsL. (2006). Treatment integrity: A review of intervention studies conducted with children with autism. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 45-54.
33.
WilbersJ. S. (1989). Effects of high and low procedural fidelity in the delay interval of the constant time delay procedure (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Kentucky, Lexington.
34.
WoleryM. (2011). Intervention research: The importance of fidelity measurement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 155-157.
35.
WoodB. K.UmbreitJ.LiaupsinC. J.GreshamF. M. (2007). A treatment integrity analysis of function-based intervention. Education & Treatment of Children, 30, 105-120.
