BernfeldG. A. (2001). The struggle for treatment integrity in a “dis-integrated” service delivery system. In BernfeldG. A.FarringtonD. P.LeschiedA. W. (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 167-188). London, England: Wiley.
2.
BillingsleyF. F.WhiteO. R.MunsonR. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
3.
BlaseK. A.FixsenD.PhillipsE. (1984). Residential treatment for troubled children: Developing service delivery systems. In PaineS. C.BellamyG. T.WilcoxB. (Eds.), Human services that work: From innovation to standard practice (pp. 149-165). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
4.
BorrelliB. (2011). The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials [Special issue: Behavioral and Social Intervention Research]. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 71, 52-63. doi:10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x
5.
ElliottD.MihalicS. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 4, 83-105.
6.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A. (1993). Creating new realities: Program development and dissemination. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 597-615.
7.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
8.
Institute of Medicine—Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
KratochwillT. R.StoiberK. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 341-389.
10.
MoncherF. J.PrinzR. J. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247-266.
11.
SchulteA.EastonJ. E.ParkerJ. (2009). Advantages in treatment integrity research: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the conceptualization, measurement, and enhancement of treatment integrity. School Psychology Review, 38, 460-475.
12.
StockardJ. (2010). An analysis of the fidelity implementation policies of the What Works Clearinghouse. Current Issues in Education, 13(4), 1-24.
13.
SutherlandK. S.McLeodB. D.ConroyM. A.AbramsL.SmithM. M. (2013). Preliminary psychometric properties of the BEST in CLASS Adherence and Competence Scale. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1063426613497258
14.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2002). Washington State’s implementation of functional family therapy for juvenile offenders: Preliminary findings (No. 02-08-1201). Olympia: Author.
15.
WoleryM. (2011). Intervention research: The importance of fidelity measurement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 155-157.