This study examined relationships between antecedent classroom factors and the disruptive behaviors of five elementary-aged students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). A descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the influence of four types of molar antecedent classroom factors (i.e., instructional setting, instructional activity, availability of materials, and adult proximity) occurring within the general education classroom on target children's disruptive behavior. Sequential analyses were conducted to identify possible influences of these factors on the relationship between adult directives and subsequent target child disruptive behavior. Results showed different antecedent classroom factors influenced the occurrence of and the strength and direction of the sequential relationships between teacher directives and child disruptive behavior across participants. Although idiosyncratic findings occurred, for the majority of participants, specific antecedent factors decreased the rate of disruptive behavior including: a group setting, academic adult-directed activities, no materials present, and no adult proximity. Implications for practitioners and future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bakeman, R., McArthur, D., & Quera, V. (1996). Detecting group differences in the sequential association using sampled permutations: Log odds, kappa, and phi compared . Behavior Research: Measurement, Instruments, and Computers , 28, 446-457.
3.
Bijou, S.W., & Baer, D.M. (1961). Child development: Vol.1. A systematic and empirical theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts .
4.
Brown, W.H. (2005). Sometimes the null hypothesis is useful information . Journal of Early Intervention, 27, 87-91.
5.
Brown, W.H., Odom, S.L., Holcombe, A., & Younguist, G. (1994). Code for active student participation and engagement revised (CAS-PER II). Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University.Carr, E.G., & Carlson , J. (1993). Reducation of severe behavior problems in the community using a mutlicomponent treatment approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 157-172.
6.
Carr, E.G., Carlson, J.I., Langdon, N.A., Magito-McLaughlin, D., & Yarbrough, S.C. (1998). Two perspectives on antecedent control: Molecular and molar. In J. K. Luiselli & M. J. Cameron (Eds.), Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support (pp. 3-28). Baltimore : Brookes,
7.
Carr, E.G., Yarbrough, S.C., & Langdon, N.A. (1997). Effects of idiosyncratic stimulus variables on functional analysis outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 673-686.
8.
Carta, J.J., Atwater, J.B., Schwartz, I.S., & Miller, P.A. (1990). Applications of ecobehavioral analysis to the study of transitions across early childhood settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 298-315.
9.
Celiberti, D.A., Bobo, H.E., Kelly, K.S., Harris, S.L., & Handleman, J.S. (1997). The differential and temporal effects of antecedent exercise on the self-stimulatory behavior of a child with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 139-150.
10.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 Sites, United States, 2002]. Surveillance Summaries, [2007]. MMWR2007;56(No. SS-1).
11.
Conroy, M.A., Asmus, J.A., Ladwig, C.N., Sellers, J.A., & Valcante, G. (2004). The effects of proximity on the behaviors of students with autism in general education classroom settings. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 119-129.
12.
Davis, C.A., & Fox, J.J. (1999). Environmental arrangement, setting events, and applied research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 77-96.
13.
Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R.L. (1980). Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 619-627.
14.
Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., Kamps, D., & Arreaga-Mayer, C. (1990). Ecobehavioral analysis of classroom instruction. In S. Schroeder (Ed.), Ecobehavioral analysis and developmental disabilities (pp. 33-63). Baltimore: Brookes,
15.
Haring, T.G., & Kennedy, C.H. (1990). Contextual control of problem behavior in students with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 23, 235-243.
16.
Horner, R.H., Day, H.M., & Day, J.R. (1997). Using neutralizing routines to reduce problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 601-614.
17.
Horner, R.H., Vaughn, B.J., Day, H.M., & Ard, W.R. (1996). The relationship between setting events and problem behavior: Expanding our understanding of behavioral support. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore: Brookes .
18.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Amendments of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, U.S.C. 20, §1400 et seq.
19.
Kantor, J.R. (1970). An analysis of the experimental analysis of behavior . Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 101-108.
20.
Kennedy, C.H. (1994). Manipulating antecedent conditions to alter the stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 161-170.
21.
Koegel, R.L., Dyer, K., & Bell, L.K. (1987). The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children's social behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243-252.
22.
Koegel, L.K., Stiebel, D., & Koegel, R.L. (1998). Interventions to facilitate communication in autism . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 383-391.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
25.
Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 36, 407-416.
26.
Luiselli, J. K. & Cameron, M. J. (Eds.). (1998). Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support. Baltimore: Brookes.
27.
Macintosh, K., & Dissanayake, C. (2006). Social skills and problem behaviors in school aged children with high-functioning autism and Asperger's disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 1065-1076.
28.
Mesibov, G., & Shea, V. (1996). Full inclusion and students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 337-346.
29.
McComas, J., Hoch, H., Paone, D., & El-Roy, D. (2000). Escape behavior during academic tasks: A preliminary analysis of idiosyncratic establishing conditions . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 479-493.
30.
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivating functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149-155.
Nordquist, V.M., Twardosz, S., & McEvoy, M.A. (1991). Effects of environmental reorganization in classrooms for children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 135-152.
33.
Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T., Solomon, O., & Sirota, K.G. (2001). Inclusion as social practice: Views of children with autism. Social Development, 10, 399-419.
34.
Quera, V., & Bakeman, R. (2000). Quantification strategies in behavioral observation research. In T. Thompson, D. Felce & F. J. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 297-316). Baltimore: Brookes,
35.
Rutter, M. (2005). Incidence of autism spectrum disorder: Changes over time and their meaning. Acta Paediatrica, 49, 2-16.
36.
Sasso, G.M., Peck, J., & Garrison-Harrell, L. (1998). Social interaction setting events: Experimental analysis of contextual variables. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 34-43.
37.
Shores, R.E., Jack, S.L., Gunter, P.L., Ellis, D.N., DeBriere, T.J., & Wehby, J.H. (1993). Classroom interactions of children with behavior disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 27-39.
38.
Smith, R.G., & Iwata, B. (1997). Antecedent influences on behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 343-375.
39.
Symons, F.J., Tapp, J., Wulfsberg, A., Sutton, K.A., Heeth, W.L., & Bodfish, J.W. (2001). Sequential analysis of the effects of naltrexone on the environmental medication of self-injurious behavior. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 269-276.
40.
Tapp, J. (2002). The MOOSES Lodge: Introduction [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved June 19, 2002, from the Vanderbilt University Web site: http://kc.vanderbilt.edu/-jont/mooses.html
41.
Taylor, J.C., Ekdahl, M.M., Romanczyk, R.G., & Miller, M.L. (1994). Escape behavior in task situations: Task versus social antecedents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 24, 331-344.
Van Acker, R., Grant, S.H., & Henry, D. (1996). Teacher and student behavior as a function of risk for aggression. Education & Treatment of Children , 19, 316-334.
44.
Wahler, R.G., & Fox, J.J. (1981). Setting events in applied behavior analysis: Toward a conceptual and methodological expansion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 327-338.
45.
Wechsler, D. (1991). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
46.
Winterling, V., Dunlap, G., & O'Neill, R.E. (1987). The influence of task variation on the aberrant behaviors of autistic students. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 105-119.
47.
Wolery, M. (2000). Commentary: The environment as a source of variability: Implications for research with individuals who have autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 379-381.
48.
Yoder, P.J., & Feurer, I.D. (2000). Quantifying the magnitude of sequential association between events or behaviors. In T. Thompson , D. Felce & F. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 317-333). Baltimore: Brookes,
