Six curriculum-based measures of math performance were developed for use with 4-year-old preschool children. Measures included counting objects, selecting numbers, naming numbers, selecting shapes, counting, and visual discrimination. Technical properties of probe scores were assessed in two rural public preschool programs. Alternate forms, source, and item reliability of probe scores were assessed with approximately 50 children per probe. A randomly selected sample of 53 children participated in the validation phase of the study. Concurrent validity of probe scores was assessed with the Brigance Screens and the Test of Early Mathematics Ability. Four of the probes yielded reliable and meaningful estimates of early math skills. Additional research is needed to evaluate the degree to which the probes are sensitive to growth and useful within comprehensive curriculum-based assessment models.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnett, D.W., Macmann, G.M., & Carey, K.T. (1992). Early intervention and the assessment of developmental skills: Challenges and directions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 21-43.
2.
Brigance, A. (1985). Brigance Preschool Screen. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
3.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
4.
Daly, E.J., III, Wright, J.A., Kelly, S.Q., & Martens, B.K. (1997). Measures of early academic skills: Reliability and validity with a first grade sample. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 268-280.
5.
Dodge, D.T., Colker, L., & Heroman, C. (2002). The creative curriculum for preschoolers (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies, Inc.
6.
Donovan, M.S. & Cross, C.T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education . Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
9.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Principles for the prevention and intervention of mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 85-95.
10.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
11.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 495-510.
12.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
13.
Ginsburg, H.P., & Baroody, A.J. (1990). Test of Early Mathematics Ability (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
14.
Glascoe, F.P. (2002). Technical reports for the Brigance Screens: Infant & toddler, early preschool, preschool, and K&1 screens. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
15.
Good, R.H., III, & Kaminski, R.A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326-336.
16.
Good, R.H., III, Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
17.
Griffin, S., & Case, R. (1997). Re-thinking the primary school math curriculum: An approach based on cognitive science. Issues in Education , 3, 1-49.
18.
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.
19.
Hayes, S.C., Nelson, R.O., & Jarrett, R.B. (1987). The treatment utility of assessment: A functional approach to evaluating assessment quality. American Psychologist , 42, 963-974.
20.
Hintze, J.M., Owen, S.V., Shapiro, E.S., & Daly, E.J., III. (2000). Generalizability of oral reading fluency measures: Application of G theory to curriculum-based measurement . School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 52-68.
21.
Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H., III. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
22.
Louisiana Department of Education (2003). Division of student standards and assessments, grade level expectations, prekindergarten mathematics. Retrieved May 26, 2004, from http://www.doe.state.la.us/lde/ssa/1841.html#PreK .
23.
Luze, G.J., Linebarger, D.L., Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., Walker, D., Leitschuh, C., & Atwater, J.B. (2001). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in the expressive communication of infants and toddlers. School Psychology Review, 30, 383-406.
24.
Marston, D.B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford Press.
25.
Marston, D., Mirkin, P., & Deno, S. (1984). Curriculum-based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral, and identification. The Journal of Special Education, 18 (2), 109-117.
26.
McConnell, S.R., McEvoy, M.A., & Priest, J.S. (2002). "Growing" measures for monitoring progress in early childhood education: A research and development process for individual growth and development indicators. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 27, 3-14.
27.
McConnell, S.R., Priest, J.S., Davis, S.D., & McEvoy, M.A. (2002). Best practices in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1231-1246). Washington DC : National Association of School Psychologists.
28.
Miller, L.J. (1993). First Steps Screening Test for Evaluating Preschoolers . San Antonio: Psych-Corp, Harcourt Educational Management.
29.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
30.
Neisworth, J.T., & Bagnato, S.J. (1992). The case against intelligence testing in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education , 12, 1-20.
31.
Phillips, N.B., Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1996). Instructional variables affecting student achievement: Case studies of two contrasting teachers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 24-33.
32.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Retrieved August 2, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/commissionsboards/whspecialeducation/reports.html
33.
Rivera-Batiz, F.L. (1992). Quantitative literacy and the likelihood of employment among young adults in the United States. The Journal of Human Resources, 27, 313-328.
34.
Shinn, M.R., & Bamonto, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: "Big ideas" and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1-31). New York: Guilford Press.
35.
Shinn, M.R., Tindal, G.A., & Spira, D.A. (1987). Special education referrals as an index of teacher tolerance: Are teachers imperfect tests? Exceptional Children , 54, 32-40.
36.
Smith, S.B., Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (1998). Phonological awareness: Instructional and curricular basics and implications. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kame'enui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 129-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
Sophian, C. (2004). Mathematics for the future: Developing a Head Start curriculum to support mathematics learning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 59-81.
38.
Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children's mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99-120.
39.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., Garvin, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction . Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 570-593.
40.
US Department of Education (2003). Mathematics and science initiative concept paper. Retrieved June 1, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mathscience/concept-paper.pdf
41.
US Department of Health and Human Services ( 2001). The Head Start path to positive child outcomes. Washington, DC.
42.
VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., & Barnett, D.W. (in submission). The emergence and futures of response to intervention . Manuscript submitted for publication.
43.
VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., Naquin, G., & Noell, G. (2001). The reliability and validity of curriculum-based measurement readiness probes for kindergarten students. School Psychology Review, 30, 363-382.
44.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. (1993). The development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83-103.
45.
Witt, J.C., Noell, G.H., LaFleur, L.H., & Mortenson, B.P. (1997). Teacher use of interventions in general education settings: Measurement and analysis of the independent variable. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 693-696.
