A Statewide Profile of Early Intervention Services Using the Part C Data System

Abstract

This study used the Part C data base and the Health Statistics Information System to profile North Carolina's early intervention services. The Part C sample consisted of 8,696 infants and toddlers eligible for early intervention services from 1991 to 1996. Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, chi-square analyses, and an examination of standardized residuals. Findings revealed that the majority (approximately 70%) of infants and toddlers were identified as having a developmental delay, with the mean age of entry into the system at approximately 17 months. Notable trends included a marked reduction in the proportion of home- and center-based services and an increase in referrals from parents. Implications are presented for program planning and evaluation, and improving information systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arcia, E. , & Gallagher, J.J. (1993). Recommendations for state data systems: The importance of socioeconomic variables. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Institute for Child and Family Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Bailey, D.B. (2000). The federal role in early intervention: Prospects for the future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education , 20, 71-78.

Bernier, K.Y. ( 1994). Early intervention service utilization in North Carolina: Differences between children with and without Medicaid. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.

Harbin, G. (1999, March). North Carolina's early intervention system for children ages birth-through-five years: A comprehensive review. Report to the North Carolina Legislature. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Hebbeler, K. ( 1993). Data systems in early intervention. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Institute for Child and Family Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Kochanek, T.T. , & Buka, S. (1998). Influential factors in the utilization of early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 323-338.

Meisels, S.J. , & Provence, S. (1996). Screening and assessment: Guidelines for identifying young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and their families . Washington, DC: Zero to Three .

National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System and Office of Special Education Programs , U.S. Department of Education ( 1998 ). Part C updates: Third in a series of updates on selected aspects of the early intervention program for infants and toddlers with disabilities, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA ). Chapel Hill, NC: Author .

National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System (1995). What's happening with Part H data systems: Summary document of the current status and nature of Part H data systems. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.

10.

Porter, P. , & Buysse, V. ( 1996). The effects of Smart Start on young children with disabilities and their families. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

11.

Roberts, R.N. , Innocenti, M.S. , & Goetze, L. ( 1999). Emerging issues from state level evaluations of early intervention programs. Journal of Early Intervention , 22, 152-163.

12.

Spiker, D. , Hebbeler, K. , Wagner, M. , Cameto, R. , & McKenna, P. (2000). A framework for describing variations in state early intervention systems. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 195-207.

13.

U.S. Census Bureau (2000). Retrieved May 15, 2002 , from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasicFactsServlet .

14.

U.S. Department of Education (1999). Twenty-first annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

15.

U.S. Department of Education (2000). Twenty-second annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.