American Psychological Association (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Carver, R. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing . Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378—399.
3.
Carver, R. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287—292.
4.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Fleiss, J.L. (1994). Measures of effect size for categorical data. In H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 245—260). New York: Sage.
6.
Friedman, H. (1968). Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 245—251.
7.
Gronlund, N.E., & Linn, R.L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (6th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
Huck, S.W., & Cormier, W.G. (1995). Reading statistics and research (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
11.
Kirk, R.A. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746—759.
12.
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231—244). New York: Sage.
13.
Schneider, A.L., & Darcy, R.E. (1984). Policy implications of using significance tests in evaluation research. Evaluation Review, 8, 573— 582.
14.
Snyder, P., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 334—349.
15.
Snyder, P., Lawson, S., Thompson, B., Stricklin, S., & Sexton, D. (1993). Evaluating the psychometric integrity of instruments used in early intervention research: The Battelle Developmental Inventory . Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13(2), 216—232.
16.
Thompson, B. (1989). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizability: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 2—6.
17.
Thompson, B. (1994). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837—847.
18.
Thompson, B. (1999, April). Common methodology mistakes in educational research, revisited, along with a primer on both effect sizes and the bootstrap . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
19.
Thompson, B., & Daniel, L.G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197—208.
20.
Thompson, B., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). Psycho-metrics is not datametrics: The test is not reliable. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 60, 174—195.
21.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594—604. (This paper is also available on the Internet at http://www.apa.org/journals/amp/amp548594.html)
22.
Zwick, W.R., & Velicer, W.F. (1986). Factors influencing five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin , 99,432—442.