The aim of the present study was to examine the potential association between a specific gaze behavior, “overstay fixations,” observed during the Trail Making Test, and cognitive functional independence after stroke.
Methods
This study was a cross-sectional, observational study. Hospitalized patients with mild stroke (n = 12) and healthy young adults (n = 19) performed the electronic version of Trail Making Test. The number of overstay fixations and the total completion time were measured. In the patients with mild stroke, the total time in conventional Japanese version of Trail Making Test and the cognitive scores in Functional Independence Measure were measured.
Findings
The mild stroke group showed significantly more overstay fixations as task difficulty increased (p = 0.005). A significant correlation existed between the overstay fixations during the electronic version of Trail Making Test part A and the cognitive Functional Independence Measure scores for Comprehension (r = -0.643) and Memory (r = -0.610). Multiple regression revealed that the total time and overstay fixations in the electronic version of the Trail Making Test were more strongly associated with the Comprehension score (R² = 0.850) compared with the total time in the paper-based Trail Making Test (R² = 0.397). Similarly, the Memory score showed stronger associations with the total time and overstay fixations in the electronic version of the Trail Making Test (R² = 0.684) than with the total time in the paper-based version (R² = 0.391).
Conclusions
The overstay fixation was associated with specific domains of cognitive functional independence in patients with mild stroke.
AbenB.StapertS.BloklandA. (2012). About the distinction between working memory and short-term memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00301
2.
AlmaghyuliA.ThompsonH.Lambon RalphM. A.JefferiesE. (2012). Deficits of semantic control produce absent or reverse frequency effects in comprehension: Evidence from neuropsychology and dual task methodology. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1968–1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.022
3.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. A. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1
4.
BaykaraE.KuhnC.LinzN.TrögerJ.KarbachJ. (2022). Validation of a digital, tablet-based version of the Trail Making Test in the delta platform. European Journal of Neuroscience, 55(2), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15541
5.
BirawoB.KasprowskiP. (2022). Review and evaluation of eye movement event detection algorithms. Sensors (Basel), 22(22), 8810. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228810
6.
BowieC. R.HarveyP. D. (2006). Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nature Protocols, 1(5), 2277–2281. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.390
7.
BrownA. W.LeeM.LennonR. J.NiewczykP. M. (2020). Functional performance and discharge setting predict outcomes 3 months after rehabilitation hospitalization for stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 29(5), 104746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104746
8.
CascellaM.Al KhaliliY. (2019). Short Term Memory Impairment. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
9.
ChaiW. J.Abd HamidA. I.AbdullahJ. M. (2018). Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401
10.
ChumneyD.NollingerK.SheskoK.SkopK.SpencerM.NewtonR. A. (2010). Ability of functional independence measure to accurately predict functional outcome of stroke-specific population: Systematic review. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 47(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2009.08.0140
CroweS. F. (1998). The differential contribution of mental tracking, cognitive flexibility, visual search, and motor speed to performance on parts A and B of the trail making test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199808)54:5<585::AID-JCLP4>3.0.CO;2-K
13.
DelazerM.SojerM.EllmererP.BoehmeC.BenkeT. (2018). Eye-tracking provides a sensitive measure of exploration deficits after acute right MCA stroke. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 359. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00359
14.
EhrensteinW. H.HeisterG.CohenR. (1982). Trail making test and visual search. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 231(4), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345589
15.
FoersterR. M. (2019). The function of “looking-at-nothing” for sequential sensorimotor tasks: Eye movements to remembered action-target locations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 12(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.2.2
16.
GaudinoE. A.GeislerM. W.SquiresN. K. (1995). Construct validity in the trail making test; what makes Part B harder?Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(4), 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639508405143
17.
GialanellaB. (2011). Aphasia assessment and functional outcome prediction in patients with aphasia after stroke. Journal of Neurology, 258(2), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5868-x
18.
GialanellaB.FerlucciC. (2010). Functional outcome after stroke in patients with aphasia and neglect; assessment by the motor and cognitive functional independence measure instrument. Cerebrovascular Disease, 30(5), 440–447. https://doi.org/0.1159/000317080
HashimotoR.MeguroK.LeeE.KasaiM.IshiiH.YamaguchiS. (2006). Effect of age and education on the Trail Making Test and determination of normative data for Japanese elderly people: The Tajiri Project. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60(4), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01526.x
21.
HayhoeM. M.ShrivastavaA.MruczekR.PelzJ. B. (2003). Visual Memory and motor planning in a natural task. Journal of Vision, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.1.6
22.
HuntR.BlackmoreT.MillsC.Miller-DicksM. (2022). Evaluating the integration of eye-tracking and motion capture technologies: Quantifying the accuracy and precision of gaze measures. i-Perception, 13(5), 20416695221116652. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695221116652
23.
IonescuA.ȘtefănescuE.StrilciucȘRafilaA.MureșanuD. (2023). Correlating eye-tracking fixation metrics and neuropsychological assessment after ischemic stroke. Medicina, 59(8), 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081361
24.
JyotsnaC.AmudhaJ.RaoR.NayarR. (2020). Intelligent gaze tracking approach for trail making test. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 38(5), 6299–6310. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179711
25.
KashimaH.HandaT.KatoM.HondaT.SakumaK.MuramatsuT., et al. (1986). Disorders of attention due to frontal lobe lesion (in Japanese). Advanced Neurological Sciences, 30(5), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1431905831
26.
KlamingL.VlaskampB. N. S. (2018). Non-dominant hand use increases completion time on part B of the Trail Making Test but not on part A. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1074–1087. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0927-1
KovariA.KatonaJ.CostescuC. (2020). Quantitative analysis of relationship between visual attention and eye-hand coordination. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.2.2020.2.5
29.
LandM.MennieN.RustedJ. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28(11), 1311–1328. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2935
LeungA. W.ChengS. K.MakA. K.LeungK. K.LiL. S.LeeT. M. (2010). Functional gain in hemorrhagic stroke patients is predicted by functional level and cognitive abilities measured at hospital admission. NeuroRehabilitation, 27(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2010-0619
33.
LezakM. D.HowiesonD. B.LoringD. W.HannayH. J.FischerJ. S. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
34.
LinariI.JuantorenaG. E.IbáñezA.PetroniA.KamienkowskiJ. E. (2022). Unveiling Trail Making Test: visual and manual trajectories indexing multiple executive processes. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article 14265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16431-9
35.
LoSassoG. L.RapportL. J.AxelrodB. N.ReederK. P. (1998). Inter manual and alternate-form equivalence on the trail making tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(1), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.20.1.107.148
O’DonnellJ. P.MacgregorL. A.DabrowskiJ. J.OestreicherJ. M.RomeroJ. J. (1994). Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(4), 596–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<596::aid-jclp2270500416>3.0.co;2-s
38.
OnkharV.DodouD.de WinterJ. C. F. (2023). Evaluating the Tobii Pro Glasses 2 and 3 in static and dynamic conditions. Behavior Research Methods, 56(5), 4221–4238. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02173-7
39.
OttenbacherK. J.HsuY.GrangerC. V.FiedlerR. C. (1996). The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(12), 1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90184-7
40.
OttonelloM.FiabaneE.AielloE. N.ManeraM. R.SpadaF.PistariniC. (2022). The association between objective cognitive measures and ecological-functional outcomes in COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 903697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903697
41.
Rajtar-ZembatyA.PrzewoźnikD.Bober-PłonkaB.Starowicz-FilipA.Rajtar-ZembatyJ.NowakR., et al. (2015). Application of the Trail Making Test in the assessment of cognitive flexibility in patients with speech disorders after ischaemic cerebral stroke. Aktualności Neurologiczne, 15(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.15557/AN.2015.0002
42.
ReckerL.FoersterR. M.SchneiderW. X.PothC. H. (2022). Emphasizing speed or accuracy in an eye-tracking version of the trail-making-test: Towards experimental diagnostics for decomposing executive functions. PLoS ONE, 17(9), e0274579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274579
43.
ReitanR. M.WolfsonD. (1985). The Halstead–ReitanNeuropsychological Test Battery: Therapy and clinical, interpretation. Neuropsychological Press.
Sánchez-CubilloI.PeriáñezJ. A.Adrover-RoigD.Rodríguez-SánchezJ. M.Ríos-LagoM.TirapuJ., et al. (2009). Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: Role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,15(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709090626
46.
SinghT.FridrikssonJ.PerryC. M.TryonS. C.RossA.FritzS., et al. (2017). Inovative methodology A novel computational model to probe visual search deficits during motor performance. Journal of Neurophysiology, 117(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00561.2016
47.
Smith-KnappK.CorriganJ. D.ArnettJ. A. (1996). Predicting functional independence from neuropsychological tests following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10(9), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/026990596124070
48.
TakedaC.NakashimaK.NotoyaM.SunaharaN. (2017). Differences between vertical and horizontal layout Trail Making Tests: A study based on a comparison of healthy young subjects (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, 33(3), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.20584/neuropsychology.17008
49.
van der LansR.WedelM.PietersR. (2011). Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: The Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) algorithm. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0031-2
50.
WoïwerW.GaebelW. (2002). Impaired trail-making test-B performance in patients with acute schizophrenia is related to inefficient sequencing of planning and acting. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 36(6), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3956(02)00050-x
51.
ZweckerM.LevenkrohnS.FleisigY.ZeiligG.OhryA.AdunskyA. (2002). Mini-mental state examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment: Relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(3), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.29641
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
