Exploring the Association Between Overstay Fixation During an Electronic Trail Making Test and Cognitive Functional Independence After Stroke

Abstract

Background/Aims

The aim of the present study was to examine the potential association between a specific gaze behavior, “overstay fixations,” observed during the Trail Making Test, and cognitive functional independence after stroke.

Methods

This study was a cross-sectional, observational study. Hospitalized patients with mild stroke (n = 12) and healthy young adults (n = 19) performed the electronic version of Trail Making Test. The number of overstay fixations and the total completion time were measured. In the patients with mild stroke, the total time in conventional Japanese version of Trail Making Test and the cognitive scores in Functional Independence Measure were measured.

Findings

The mild stroke group showed significantly more overstay fixations as task difficulty increased (p = 0.005). A significant correlation existed between the overstay fixations during the electronic version of Trail Making Test part A and the cognitive Functional Independence Measure scores for Comprehension (r = -0.643) and Memory (r = -0.610). Multiple regression revealed that the total time and overstay fixations in the electronic version of the Trail Making Test were more strongly associated with the Comprehension score (R² = 0.850) compared with the total time in the paper-based Trail Making Test (R² = 0.397). Similarly, the Memory score showed stronger associations with the total time and overstay fixations in the electronic version of the Trail Making Test (R² = 0.684) than with the total time in the paper-based version (R² = 0.391).

Conclusions

The overstay fixation was associated with specific domains of cognitive functional independence in patients with mild stroke.

Keywords

stroke neurorehabilitation cognitive impairment assessment functional assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aben

Stapert

Blokland

(2012). About the distinction between working memory and short-term memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00301

Almaghyuli

Thompson

Lambon Ralph

M. A.

Jefferies

(2012). Deficits of semantic control produce absent or reverse frequency effects in comprehension: Evidence from neuropsychology and dual task methodology. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1968–1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.022

Baddeley

A. D.

Hitch

G. J.

(1974). Working memory. In Bower

G. A.

(Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1

Baykara

Kuhn

Linz

Tröger

Karbach

(2022). Validation of a digital, tablet-based version of the Trail Making Test in the delta platform. European Journal of Neuroscience, 55(2), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15541

Birawo

Kasprowski

(2022). Review and evaluation of eye movement event detection algorithms. Sensors (Basel), 22(22), 8810. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228810

Bowie

C. R.

Harvey

P. D.

(2006). Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nature Protocols, 1(5), 2277–2281. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.390

Brown

A. W.

Lee

Lennon

R. J.

Niewczyk

P. M.

(2020). Functional performance and discharge setting predict outcomes 3 months after rehabilitation hospitalization for stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 29(5), 104746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104746

Cascella

Al Khalili

(2019). Short Term Memory Impairment. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.

Chai

W. J.

Abd Hamid

A. I.

Abdullah

J. M.

(2018). Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401

10.

Chumney

Nollinger

Shesko

Skop

Spencer

Newton

R. A.

(2010). Ability of functional independence measure to accurately predict functional outcome of stroke-specific population: Systematic review. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 47(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2009.08.0140

11.

Cowan

(2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9

12.

Crowe

S. F.

(1998). The differential contribution of mental tracking, cognitive flexibility, visual search, and motor speed to performance on parts A and B of the trail making test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199808)54:5<585::AID-JCLP4>3.0.CO;2-K

13.

Delazer

Sojer

Ellmerer

Boehme

Benke

(2018). Eye-tracking provides a sensitive measure of exploration deficits after acute right MCA stroke. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 359. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00359

14.

Ehrenstein

W. H.

Heister

Cohen

(1982). Trail making test and visual search. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 231(4), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345589

15.

Foerster

R. M.

(2019). The function of “looking-at-nothing” for sequential sensorimotor tasks: Eye movements to remembered action-target locations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 12(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.2.2

16.

Gaudino

E. A.

Geisler

M. W.

Squires

N. K.

(1995). Construct validity in the trail making test; what makes Part B harder? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17(4), 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639508405143

17.

Gialanella

(2011). Aphasia assessment and functional outcome prediction in patients with aphasia after stroke. Journal of Neurology, 258(2), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5868-x

18.

Gialanella

Ferlucci

(2010). Functional outcome after stroke in patients with aphasia and neglect; assessment by the motor and cognitive functional independence measure instrument. Cerebrovascular Disease, 30(5), 440–447. https://doi.org/0.1159/000317080

19.

Gilchrist

I. D.

Harvey

(2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10(19), 1209–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00729-6

20.

Hashimoto

Meguro

Lee

Kasai

Ishii

Yamaguchi

(2006). Effect of age and education on the Trail Making Test and determination of normative data for Japanese elderly people: The Tajiri Project. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60(4), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01526.x

21.

Hayhoe

M. M.

Shrivastava

Mruczek

Pelz

J. B.

(2003). Visual Memory and motor planning in a natural task. Journal of Vision, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.1.6

22.

Hunt

Blackmore

Mills

Miller-Dicks

(2022). Evaluating the integration of eye-tracking and motion capture technologies: Quantifying the accuracy and precision of gaze measures. i-Perception, 13(5), 20416695221116652. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695221116652

23.

Ionescu

Ștefănescu

Strilciuc

Rafila

Mureșanu

(2023). Correlating eye-tracking fixation metrics and neuropsychological assessment after ischemic stroke. Medicina, 59(8), 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081361

24.

Jyotsna

Amudha

Rao

Nayar

(2020). Intelligent gaze tracking approach for trail making test. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 38(5), 6299–6310. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179711

25.

Kashima

Handa

Kato

Honda

Sakuma

Muramatsu

, et al. (1986). Disorders of attention due to frontal lobe lesion (in Japanese). Advanced Neurological Sciences, 30(5), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1431905831

26.

Klaming

Vlaskamp

B. N. S.

(2018). Non-dominant hand use increases completion time on part B of the Trail Making Test but not on part A. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1074–1087. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0927-1

27.

Körner

Gilchrist

I. D.

(2008). Memory processes in multiple-target visual search. Psychological Research, 72(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0075-1

28.

Kovari

Katona

Costescu

(2020). Quantitative analysis of relationship between visual attention and eye-hand coordination. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.2.2020.2.5

29.

Land

Mennie

Rusted

(1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28(11), 1311–1328. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2935

30.

Land

M. F.

(2006). Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 25(3), 296–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.01.002

31.

Land

M. F.

Hayhoe

(2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Research, 41(25-26), 3559–3565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00102-X

32.

Leung

A. W.

Cheng

S. K.

Mak

A. K.

Leung

K. K.

L. S.

Lee

T. M.

(2010). Functional gain in hemorrhagic stroke patients is predicted by functional level and cognitive abilities measured at hospital admission. NeuroRehabilitation, 27(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2010-0619

33.

Lezak

M. D.

Howieson

D. B.

Loring

D. W.

Hannay

H. J.

Fischer

J. S.

(2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

34.

Linari

Juantorena

G. E.

Ibáñez

Petroni

Kamienkowski

J. E.

(2022). Unveiling Trail Making Test: visual and manual trajectories indexing multiple executive processes. Scientific Reports, 12(1), Article 14265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16431-9

35.

LoSasso

G. L.

Rapport

L. J.

Axelrod

B. N.

Reeder

K. P.

(1998). Inter manual and alternate-form equivalence on the trail making tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(1), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.20.1.107.148

36.

Meghanathan

R. N.

Nikolaev

A. R.

van Leeuwen

(2019). Refixation patterns reveal memory-encoding strategies in free viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2499–2516. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01735-2

37.

O’Donnell

J. P.

Macgregor

L. A.

Dabrowski

J. J.

Oestreicher

J. M.

Romero

J. J.

(1994). Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(4), 596–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<596::aid-jclp2270500416>3.0.co;2-s

38.

Onkhar

Dodou

de Winter

J. C. F.

(2023). Evaluating the Tobii Pro Glasses 2 and 3 in static and dynamic conditions. Behavior Research Methods, 56(5), 4221–4238. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02173-7

39.

Ottenbacher

K. J.

Hsu

Granger

C. V.

Fiedler

R. C.

(1996). The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(12), 1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90184-7

40.

Ottonello

Fiabane

Aiello

E. N.

Manera

M. R.

Spada

Pistarini

(2022). The association between objective cognitive measures and ecological-functional outcomes in COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 903697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903697

41.

Rajtar-Zembaty

Przewoźnik

Bober-Płonka

Starowicz-Filip

Rajtar-Zembaty

Nowak

, et al. (2015). Application of the Trail Making Test in the assessment of cognitive flexibility in patients with speech disorders after ischaemic cerebral stroke. Aktualności Neurologiczne, 15(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.15557/AN.2015.0002

42.

Recker

Foerster

R. M.

Schneider

W. X.

Poth

C. H.

(2022). Emphasizing speed or accuracy in an eye-tracking version of the trail-making-test: Towards experimental diagnostics for decomposing executive functions. PLoS ONE, 17(9), e0274579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274579

43.

Reitan

R. M.

Wolfson

(1985). The Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Therapy and clinical, interpretation. Neuropsychological Press .

44.

Salthouse

T. A.

(2011). What cognitive abilities are involved in trail-making performance? Intelligence, 39(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.001

45.

Sánchez-Cubillo

Periáñez

J. A.

Adrover-Roig

Rodríguez-Sánchez

J. M.

Ríos-Lago

Tirapu

, et al. (2009). Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: Role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709090626

46.

Singh

Fridriksson

Perry

C. M.

Tryon

S. C.

Ross

Fritz

, et al. (2017). Inovative methodology A novel computational model to probe visual search deficits during motor performance. Journal of Neurophysiology, 117(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00561.2016

47.

Smith-Knapp

Corrigan

J. D.

Arnett

J. A.

(1996). Predicting functional independence from neuropsychological tests following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10(9), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/026990596124070

48.

Takeda

Nakashima

Notoya

Sunahara

(2017). Differences between vertical and horizontal layout Trail Making Tests: A study based on a comparison of healthy young subjects (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, 33(3), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.20584/neuropsychology.17008

49.

van der Lans

Wedel

Pieters

(2011). Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: The Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) algorithm. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0031-2

50.

Woïwer

Gaebel

(2002). Impaired trail-making test-B performance in patients with acute schizophrenia is related to inefficient sequencing of planning and acting. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 36(6), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3956(02)00050-x

51.

Zwecker

Levenkrohn

Fleisig

Zeilig

Ohry

Adunsky

(2002). Mini-mental state examination, cognitive FIM instrument, and the loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment: Relation to functional outcome of stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(3), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.29641

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB