Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-2
Effect of Progressive Speed Increase Versus Constant Speed in Robot-Assisted Gait Training on Balance and Gait Ability in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we evaluated the efficacy of a progressive speed increase in robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on balance and gait performance in chronic stroke patients.
Methods
In total, 20 patients with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to a progressive speed increase (n = 10) or a constant speed (n = 10) RAGT group. Both groups underwent 12 training sessions over 4 weeks (3 sessions per week). Outcome measures, including postural sway, limits of stability, the Berg Balance Scale score, and 6-min walk test (6MWT) performance, were assessed before and after the intervention. Within-group differences were analyzed using paired t-tests, whereas independent t-tests were employed to analyze between-group differences (α = 0.05).
Results
Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all measured outcomes (p < 0.05). However, the experimental group showed significantly greater gains in 6MWT distance (mean between-group difference: 8.55 m; Cohen's d = 1.33) and walking speed (Cohen's d = 1.45) compared to the control group (p < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed in balance outcomes (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
Progressive speed increase in RAGT is an effective intervention for enhancing walking distance and speed in chronic stroke patients. However, the observed improvements did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and future studies should assess long-term clinical significance.
BangD. H.ShinW. S. (2016). Effects of robot-assisted gait training on spatiotemporal gait parameters and balance in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 38(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-161325
2.
Belda-LoisJ. M.Mena-del HornoS.Bermejo-BoschI.MorenoJ. C.PonsJ. L.FarinaD.ReaM. (2011). Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: A review towards a top-down approach. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 13(8), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-8-66
3.
ChanL.ChinL. M.KennedyM., et al. (2013). Benefits of intensive treadmill exercise training on cardiorespiratory function and quality of life in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest, 143(2), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-0993
4.
ChenG.PattenC.KothariD. H.ZajacF. E. (2005). Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait & Posture, 22(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.06.009
5.
ChenX.YinL.HouY.WangJ.LiY.YanJ.MaS. (2024). Effect of robot-assisted gait training on improving cardiopulmonary function in stroke patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 21(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01388-9
6.
ChoiJ. H.KimB. R.HanE. Y.KimS. M. (2015). The effect of dual-task training on balance and cognition in patients with subacute post-stroke. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.1.81
7.
DicksteinR. (2008). Rehabilitation of gait speed after stroke: A critical review of intervention approaches. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(6), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308315997
8.
EngJ. J.DawsonA. S.ChuK. S. (2004). Submaximal exercise in persons with stroke: Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with maximal oxygen consumption. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00436-2
9.
FeiginV. L.LawesC. M.BennettD. A.AndersonC. S. (2003). Stroke epidemiology: A review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. The Lancet Neurology, 2(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00266-7
10.
GandolfiM.ValèN.DimitrovaE.ZanolinM. E.MattiuzN.BattistuzziE.SmaniaN. (2019). Robot-assisted stair climbing training on postural control and sensory integration processes in chronic post-stroke patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01143
11.
GeorgeH. T.StraubeD. S.KinnairdC. R.HolleranC. L.EchauzA. J.RodriguezK. S.NarducciE. A. (2011). Importance of specificity, amount, and intensity of locomotor training to improve ambulatory function in patients poststroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 18(4), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1804-293
12.
GrayV. L.IvanovaT. D.GarlandS. J. (2014). Reliability of center of pressure measures within and between sessions in individuals post-stroke and healthy controls. Gait & Posture, 40(1), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.191
13.
HarveyR. L. (2009). Improving poststroke recovery: Neuroplasticity and task-oriented training. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 11(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-009-0026-4
14.
HornbyT. G.ReismanD. S.WardI. G.ScheetsP. L.MillerA.HaddadD.FoxE. J. (2020). Clinical practice guideline to improve locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 44(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000303
15.
HsiehY. W.WuC. Y.LinK. C.YaoG.WuK. Y.ChangY. J. (2012). Dose-response relationship of robot-assisted stroke motor rehabilitation: The impact of initial motor status. Stroke, 43(10), 2729–2734. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.658807
16.
HuJ.JinL.WangY.ShenX. (2023). Feasibility of challenging treadmill speed-dependent gait and perturbation-induced balance training in chronic stroke patients with low ambulation ability: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Neurology, 17(14), 1167261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1167261
17.
JayaramanA.MadhavanM. K.MummidisettyC. K.RothH. R.HohlK.TappA.BrennanA.KocherginskyM.WilliamsK. J. (2019). Stride management assist exoskeleton vs functional gait training in stroke: A randomized trial. Neurology, 92(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006782
18.
JørgensenH. S.NakayamaH.RaaschouH. O.OlsenT. S. (1995). Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80038-7
19.
JungH. Y.ParkJ. H.ShimJ. J.KimM. J.HwangM. R.KimS. H. (2006). Reliability test of Korean version of berg balance scale. Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, 30(6), 611–618.
20.
JungK. H.HaH. G.ShinH. J.OhnS. H.SungD. H.LeeP. K.KimY. H. (2008). Effects of robot-assisted gait therapy on locomotor recovery in stroke patients. Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32(3), 258–266.
21.
KayabınarE.ÖzalpM.KoçyiğitM. F.AsİElbasanB. (2019). The effects of robotic and conventional gait training in addition to neurodevelopmental treatment on balance, mobility, and health-related quality of life in patients with stroke. Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology, 36(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.5152/NSN.2019.10027
22.
KimH.ParkG.ShinJ. H.YouJ. H. (2020). Neuroplastic effects of end-effector robotic gait training for hemiparetic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 12461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69367-3
23.
KimK. T.ChoiY.ChoJ. H.LeeS. (2023). Feasibility and usability of a robot-assisted complex upper and lower limb rehabilitation system in patients with stroke: A pilot study. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.23017
24.
KwakkelG.WagenaarR. C. (2002). Effect of duration of upper-and lower-extremity rehabilitation sessions and walking speed on recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait. Physical Therapy, 82(5), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.5.432
LauK. W.MakM. K. (2011). Speed-dependent treadmill training is effective to improve gait and balance performance in patients with sub-acute stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43(8), 709–713. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0838
27.
LuoL.ZhuS.ShiL.WangP.LiM.YuanS. (2019). High intensity exercise for walking competency in individuals with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 28(12), 104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104414
28.
Marín-MedinaD. S.Arenas-VargasP. A.Arias-BoteroJ. C.Gómez-VásquezM.Jaramillo-LópezM. F.Gaspar-ToroJ. M. (2024). New approaches to recovery after stroke. Neurological Sciences, 45(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-07012-3
29.
MbalilakiJ. A.LilleheieI.RimehaugS. A.TveitanS. N.LinnestadA. M.KrøllP.MooreJ. L. (2024). Facilitators and barriers to implementing high-intensity gait training in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(13), 3708. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133708
30.
McGregorS. J.BusaM. A.YaggieJ. A., et al. (2009). High resolution MEMS accelerometers to estimate VO2 and compare running mechanics between highly trained inter-collegiate and untrained runners. PLoS One, 4(10), e7355. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007355
31.
MichaelK. M.AllenJ. K.MackoR. F. (2005). Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: The role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(8), 1552–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.026
32.
MoroneG.PaolucciS.CherubiniA.De AngelisD.VenturieroV.CoiroP.IosaM. (2017). Robot-assisted gait training for stroke patients: Current state of the art and perspectives of robotics. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 13, 1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S114102
33.
OginoT. K.UegakiY.YamaguchiR.MorisakiT.NakanoK.DomenK. (2020). Effects of gait exercise assist robot (GEAR) on subjects with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases, 29(8), 104886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104886
34.
PattersonK. K.ParafianowiczI.DanellsC. J.ClossonV.VerrierM. C.StainesW. R.McIlroyW. E. (2008a). Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(2), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.142
35.
PattersonS. L.RodgersM. M.MackoR. F., et al. (2008b). Effect of treadmill exercise training on spatial and temporal gait parameters in subjects with chronic stroke: A preliminary report. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.02.0024
36.
PerryJ.GarrettM.GronleyJ. K.MulroyS. J. (1995). Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke, 26(6), 982–989. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.6.982
37.
PohlM.MehrholzJ.RitschelC.RückriemS. (2002). Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 33(2), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0202.102365
38.
RienerR.NefT.ColomboG. (2005). Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 43(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345116
39.
SelvesC.StoquartG.LejeuneT. (2020). Gait rehabilitation after stroke: Review of the evidence of predictors, clinical outcomes, and timing for interventions. Acta Neurologica Belgica, 120(4), 783–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01320-7
40.
TangA.EngJ. J.RandD. (2012). Relationship between perceived and measured changes in walking after stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 36(3), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e318262dbd0
41.
YunN.JooM. C.KimS. C.KimM. S. (2018). Robot-assisted gait training effectively improved lateropulsion in subacute stroke patients: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 54(6), 827–836. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05077-3
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
