Children with cerebral palsy (CP) may present motor and gait impairment.
Objective
This systematic review aims to assess the potential of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) with Lokomat® exoskeleton to improve gait in children with CP.
Methods
The search was conducted and repoted according to PRISMA guidelines on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and PEDro databases. All randomised controlled trials (RCT) including children with CP who underwent RAGT with Lokomat® were considered eligible. Risk of bias was assessed with the Rob2 tool by two blinded reviewers. The review was previously registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42023488699).
Results
948 articles were found, and 9 studies involving 403 children with CP met the inclusion criteria. We found a heterogeneity in the RAGT protocol and a higher risk of bias for two included studies. Seven out nine studies reported a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) on gait, balance, or global functions with respect to control groups. Specifically, walking speed and stride length were improved after RAGT.
Conclusions
Children with CP can benefit from the add-on therapy with RAGT through Lokomat® to improve walking and balance function. There is a need for RCTs with better patient stratification and with less heterogeneity in outcomes to improve the quality of the pooled evidence.
Ammann-ReifferC.BastiaenenC. H. G.Meyer-HeimA. D.van HedelH. J. A. (2020). Lessons learned from conducting a pragmatic, randomized, crossover trial on robot-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy (PeLoGAIT). Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 13(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-190614
2.
ArmandS.DecoulonG.Bonnefoy-MazureA. (2016). Gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy. EFORT Open Reviews, 1(12), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000052
3.
BalgayevaM.BulekbayevaS. (2018). Effectiveness of the combined use of robotic kinesiotherapy and botulinum therapy in the complex rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 11(9), 360–264. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i9.26541
4.
BenzingV.SchmidtM. (2018). Exergaming for children and adolescents: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(11), 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7110422
5.
BressiF.CinneraA. M.MoroneG.CampagnolaB.CricentiL.SantacaterinaF.MiccinilliS.ZolloL.PaolucciS.Di LazzaroV.SterziS.BraviM. (2022). Combining robot-assisted gait training and non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic stroke patients: A systematic review. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 795788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.795788
6.
CalabròR. S.CassioA.MazzoliD., et al. (2021). What does evidence tell us about the use of gait robotic devices in patients with multiple sclerosis? A comprehensive systematic review on functional outcomes and clinical recommendations. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(5), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06915-X
7.
CarcreffL.GerberC. N.Paraschiv-IonescuA., et al. (2020). Walking speed of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: Laboratory versus daily life. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 14(8), 812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00812
8.
CastelliE.BerettaE.De TantiA., et al. (2022). Robot-assisted rehabilitation for children with neurological disabilities: Results of the Italian consensus conference CICERONE. NeuroRehabilitation, 51(4), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-220036
9.
ChiuH. C.AdaL.BaniaT. A. (2020). Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11(11), CD013114. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013114.pub2
10.
De BartoloD.SpitoniG. F.IosaM., et al. (2019). From movement to thought and back: A review on the role of cognitive factors influencing technological neurorehabilitation. Functional Neurology, 34(3), 131–144.
11.
DrużbickiM.RusekW.SnelaS., et al. (2013). Functional effects of robotic-assisted locomotor treadmill therapy in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(4), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1114
12.
DrużbickiM.RusekW.SzczepanikM., et al. (2010). Assessment of the impact of orthotic gait training on balance in children with cerebral palsy. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 12(3), 53–58.
13.
EriksenM. B.FrandsenT. F. (2018). The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345
14.
FuW. S.SongY. C.WuB. A., et al. (2022). Virtual reality combined with robot-assisted gait training to improve walking ability of children with cerebral palsy: A controlled trial. Technology and Health Care, 30(6), 1525–1533. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-212821
15.
GandolfiM.MazzoleniS.MoroneG., et al. (2023). The role of feedback in robotic-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 20(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2169129
16.
GandolfiM.ValèN.PosteraroF., et al. (2021). State of the art and challenges for the classification of studies on electromechanical and robotic devices in neurorehabilitation: A scoping review. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(5), 831–840. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06922-7
17.
GigginsO. M.PerssonU. M.CaulfieldB. (2013). Biofeedback in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 18(10), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-60
18.
HigginsJ. P.AltmanD. G.GøtzscheP. C., et al. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ, 343, d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
19.
HilderleyA. J.FehlingsD.LeeG. W.WrightF. V. (2016). Comparison of a robotic-assisted gait training program with a program of functional gait training for children with cerebral palsy: Design and methods of a two group randomized controlled cross-over trial. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1886. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3535-0
20.
HungJ. W.YenC. L.ChangK. C., et al. (2022). A pilot controlled trial of botulinum toxin treatment combined with robot-assisted therapy, mirror therapy, or active control treatment in patients with spasticity following stroke. Toxins, 14(6), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14060415
21.
HuttonJ. L.PharoahP. O. D.RosenbloomL. (2002). Effects of cognitive, motor, and sensory disabilities on survival in cerebral palsy. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 86(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.86.2.84
22.
HyakutakeK.MorishitaT.SaitaK., et al. (2022). Effect of robot-assisted rehabilitation to botulinum toxin A injection for upper limb disability in patients with chronic stroke: A case series and systematic review. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 62(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0408
23.
IosaM.ZoccolilloL.MontesiM., et al. (2014). The brain's sense of walking: A study on the intertwine between locomotor imagery and internal locomotor models in healthy adults, typically developing children and children with cerebral palsy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 27(8), 859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00859
24.
LissomL. O.LambertiN.LavezziS., et al. (2022). Is robot-assisted gait training intensity a determinant of functional recovery early after stroke? A pragmatic observational study of clinical care. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 45(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000518
25.
LupoA.CinneraA. M.PucelloA., et al. (2018). Effects on balance skills and patient compliance of biofeedback training with inertial measurement units and exergaming in subacute stroke: A pilot controlled trial. Functional Neurology, 33(3), 131–136.
26.
MahgoubM. S. E.YounanW. W.ZahraS. S. (2020). Effect of locomotor training with a robotic-gait orthosis (Lokomat) in spasticity modulation of spastic hemiplegic children: A controlled trial. Fizjoterapia Polska, 20(4), 94–101.
27.
MartinoC. A.PicernoP.BisirriA., et al. (2024). Upper limb assessment with inertial measurement units according to the international classification of functioning in stroke: A systematic review and correlation meta-analysis. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 31(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2023.2197278
28.
MartinoC. A.PucelloA.LupoA., et al. (2019). Upper limb motor improvement in chronic stroke after combining botulinum toxin A injection and multi-joints robot-assisted therapy: A case report. Oxford Medical Case Reports, 2019(10), omz097. https://doi.org/10.1093/omcr/omz097
29.
Martino CinneraA.PalombaA.PaciM.MarinoD.La RosaG.GimiglianoF.StraudiS.MoroneG. (2024). A three-year update on guidelines for upper limb robotic rehabilitation after stroke. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 60(4), 556–558. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08451-X
30.
McguinnessL. A.HigginsJ. P. T. (2021). Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Research Synthesis Methods , 12(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jrsm.1411
31.
McIntyreS.GoldsmithS.WebbA., et al. (2022). Global prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic analysis. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 64(12), 1494–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15346
32.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ., et al. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 6(7), 339, b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
33.
MoroneG.PaolucciS.CherubiniA., et al. (2017). Robot-assisted gait training for stroke patients: Current state of the art and perspectives of robotics. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 13, 1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S114102
34.
NovakI.MorganC.AddeL., et al. (2017). Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: Advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Pediatrics, 171(9), 897–907. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689
35.
OuzzaniM.HammadyH.FedorowiczZ., et al. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
36.
PageM. J.MckenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McdonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
37.
PeriE.TurconiA. C.BiffiE., et al. (2017). Effects of dose and duration of robot-assisted gait training on walking ability of children affected by cerebral palsy. Technology and Health Care, 25(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-160668
38.
PerpetuiniD.RussoE. F.CardoneD., et al. (2022). Identification of functional cortical plasticity in children with cerebral palsy associated to robotic-assisted gait training: An fNIRS study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(22), 6790. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226790
39.
SarhanR. S.ChevidikunnanM. F.GaowgzehR. A. M. (2014). Locomotor treadmill training program using driven gait orthosis versus manual treadmill therapy on motor output in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy children. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU, 4(4), 010–017. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1703824
40.
StraudiS.SeveriniG.Da RoitM., et al. (2020). The dose of robot-assisted gait therapy may influence functional recovery in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program: An exploratory retrospective study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 43(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000407
41.
ValèN.GandolfiM.VignoliL., et al. (2021). Electromechanical and robotic devices for gait and balance rehabilitation of children with neurological disability: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11(24), 12061. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112412061
42.
van den NoortJ. C.FerrariA.CuttiA. G., et al. (2013). Gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy via inertial and magnetic sensors. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 51(4), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-1006-5
43.
VezérM.GresitsO.EnghM. A., et al. (2024). Evidence for gait improvement with robotic-assisted gait training of children with cerebral palsy remains uncertain. Gait & Posture, 107, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.08.016
44.
VitrikasK.DaltonH.BreishD. (2020). Cerebral palsy: An overview. American Family Physician, 101(4), 213–220.
45.
WallardL.DietrichG.KerlirzinY., et al. (2018). Effect of robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation on dynamic equilibrium control in the gait of children with cerebral palsy. Gait & Posture, 60, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.007
46.
WiartL.RosychukR. J.WrightF. V. (2016). Evaluation of the effectiveness of robotic gait training and gait-focused physical therapy programs for children and youth with cerebral palsy: A mixed methods RCT. BMC neurology, 16, 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0582-7
47.
WuS. S.SunF.ZhanS. Y. (2017). [Bias risk assessment: (3) Revised Cochrane bias risk assessment tool for individual randomized, cross-over trials (RoB2.0)]. Zhonghua liu Xing Bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 38(10), 1436–1440. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.10.028
48.
WuL.XuG.WuQ. (2023). The effect of the lokomat® robotic-orthosis system on lower extremity rehabilitation in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neurology, 14, 1260652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1260652
49.
YoonC.JeonY.ChoiH., et al. (2023). Interpretable classification for multivariate gait analysis of cerebral palsy. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 22(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01168-x
50.
ZhangB.WongK. P.KangR., et al. (2023). Efficacy of robot-assisted and virtual reality interventions on balance, gait, and daily function in patients with stroke: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 104(10), 1711–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
