Arm-leg coordinated humanoid exoskeletal robots offer a solution to the ‘unnatural’ gait patterns seen in current leg-only exoskeletons, but their neuromechanical control mechanisms require further exploration.
Objective
This study investigates the neuromechanical properties and modulation of cervical and lumbar central pattern generators (CPGs) across different gait training conditions.
Methods
Eleven healthy adults (mean age: 25.27 ± 1.95 years; 5 females, 6 males) participated in gait analysis involving kinematics, kinetics, and electromyography during treadmill-based arm-leg interlimb coordination (TIT), robot-assisted arm-leg coordination (RIT), and robot-assisted leg-only coordination (RLT).
Results
Trunk counterrotation and shoulder, hip, and knee kinematics in RIT closely resembled those in TIT (5–10% variance) but significantly differed from RLT (30–40% variance). Electromyography revealed normalized reciprocal activation between the anterior and posterior deltoids (r = -0.48), tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius (r = -0.68) during RIT, while RLT showed altered agonist-antagonist co-activation (r = 0.84).
Conclusions
These findings highlight the importance of cervical and lumbar CPG interaction in natural locomotion, suggesting that arm-leg coordinated exoskeletons could improve neurorehabilitation for individuals recovering from stroke or spinal cord injury.
AlwardatM.EtoomM.Al DajahS.SchirinziT.Di LazzaroG.SalimeiP. S.PisaniA. (2018). Effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training on motor impairments in people with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 41(4), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000312
2.
Aurich-SchulerT.GutA.LabruyèreR. (2019). The FreeD module for the Lokomat facilitates a physiological movement pattern in healthy people–a proof of concept study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil, 16, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0454-z
3.
BarrosoF.SantosC.MorenoJ. C. (2013). Influence of the robotic exoskeleton lokomat on the control of human gait: An electromyographic and kinematic analysis, in 2013 IEEE 3rd Port. Meeting in Bioengineering (ENBENG), February 2013, Braga, Portugal1–6.
4.
BocciaG.RainoldiA. (2014). Innervation zones location and optimal electrodes position of obliquus internus and obliquus externus abdominis muscles. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol, 24(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.10.017
5.
BoviG.RabuffettiM.MazzoleniP.FerrarinM. (2011). A multiple-task gait analysis approach: Kinematic, kinetic and EMG reference data for healthy young and adult subjects. Gait Posture, 33(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.08.009
6.
ColeM. H.GrimshawP. N. (2009). The X-factor and its relationship to golfing performance. J. Quant. Anal. Sports, 5(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1134
7.
DavisR. B.IIIÕunpuuS.TyburskiD.GageJ. R. (1991). A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum. Mov. Sci, 10(5), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-Z
8.
DeBerardinisJ.DufekJ. S.TrabiaM. B.LidstoneD. E. (2018). Assessing the validity of pressure-measuring insoles in quantifying gait variables. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668317752088
9.
ElrahimR. M. A.EmbabyE. A.AliM. F.KamelR. M. (2016). Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of Kinovea software for measurement of shoulder range of motion. Bull. Fac. Phys. Ther, 21, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-6611.196778
10.
Fernández-GonzálezP., et al. (2020). Reliability of Kinovea® software and agreement with a three-dimensional motion system for gait analysis in healthy subjects. Sensors (Basel), 20, 3154. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113154
11.
FrigonA. (2017). The neural control of interlimb coordination during mammalian locomotion. J. Neurophysiol, 117(6), 2224–2241. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00978.2016
12.
GouldZ. I.OliverJ. L.LloydR. S.NeilR.BullM. (2021). The golf movement screen is related to spine control and X-factor of the golf swing in low handicap golfers. J. Strength Cond. Res, 35(1), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002664
13.
HermensH. J.FreriksB.Disselhorst-KlugC.RauG. (2000). Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol, 10(5), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4
14.
HidlerJ. M.WallA. E. (2005). Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol Avon), 20(2), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016
15.
KangT. W.OhD. W.LeeJ. H.CynnH. S. (2018). Effects of integrating rhythmic arm swing into robot-assisted walking in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study. Int. J. Rehabil. Res, 41(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000260
16.
KimS. Y., et al. (2015). Effects of innovative WALKBOT robotic-assisted locomotor training on balance and gait recovery in hemiparetic stroke: A prospective, randomized, experimenter blinded case control study with a four-week follow-up. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng, 23(4), 636–642. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2404936
17.
KlobuckáS.KlobuckýR.KollárB. (2020). Effect of robot-assisted gait training on motor functions in adolescent and young adult patients with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 47(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-203102
18.
KuboK.MiyoshiT.KanaiA.TerashimaK. (2011). Gait rehabilitation device in central nervous system disease: A review. J. Robot, 2011, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/348207
19.
LoroA.BorgM. B.BattagliaM.AmicoA. P.AntenucciR.BenantiP.BaricichA. (2023). Balance rehabilitation through robot-assisted gait training in post-stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 13(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13010092
20.
MatsudaM., et al. (2018). Immediate effects of a single session of robot-assisted gait training using Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for cerebral palsy. J. Phys. Ther. Sci, 30(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.207
21.
MeynsP., et al. (2012). Is interlimb coordination during walking preserved in children with cerebral palsy?Res. Dev. Disabil, 33(5), 1418–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.03.020
NeckelN. D.BlonienN.NicholsD.HidlerJ. (2008). Abnormal joint torque patterns exhibited by chronic stroke subjects while walking with a prescribed physiological gait pattern. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil, 5, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-5-19
24.
Nienhuis, B., Alingh, J. F., Weerdesteyn, V., Geurts, A. C. H., Groen, B. E., & van Asseldonk, E. H. F. (2019). Immediate after-effects of robot-assisted gait with pelvic support or pelvic constraint on overground walking in healthy subjects. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0506-z
25.
OgawaT., et al. (2015). Rhythmic arm swing enhances patterned locomotor-like muscle activity in passively moved lower extremities. Physiol. Rep, 3(3), e12317. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12317
26.
ParkC.YouS. J. H. (2021). Validity and test-retest reliability of an intelligent robotic shoulder joint kinematics system for rehabilitation. J. Mech. Med. Biol, 21(10), 2140065. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519421400650
27.
ProstS., et al. (2021). Description of spine motion during gait in normal adolescents and young adults. Eur. Spine J, 30, 2520–2530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06918-w
28.
SmithA. C.RobertsJ. R.WallaceE. S.KongP.ForresterS. E. (2016). Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for analysis of trunk kinematic variables in the golf swing. J. Appl. Biomech, 32(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2015-0032
29.
SwinnenE., et al. (2015). Robot-assisted walking with the Lokomat: The influence of different levels of guidance force on thorax and pelvis kinematics. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol Avon), 30(3), 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.01.006
30.
UmbergerB. R. (2008). Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking. J. Biomech, 41(11), 2575–2580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.024
Van KammenK.BoonstraA.Reinders-MesselinkH.den OtterR. (2014). The combined effects of body weight support and gait speed on gait related muscle activity: A comparison between walking in the Lokomat exoskeleton and regular treadmill walking. PLOS ONE, 9(9), e107323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107323
33.
WeberC. F.McClintonS. (2020). Validity and reliability of video-based analysis of upper trunk rotation during running. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther, 15(6), 910–919. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20200910
34.
YangH. S.AtkinsL. T.JensenD. B.JamesC. R. (2015). Effects of constrained arm swing on vertical center of mass displacement during walking. Gait Posture, 42(4), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.07.010
