Abstract
Background
Chronic neck pain is a prevalent source of disability worldwide, and existing reviews report limited certainty due to heterogeneous methodologies and outdated trials.
Objective
To update and strengthen the evidence on the effectiveness and safety of cupping therapy for chronic neck pain by incorporating recent high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods
In accordance with PRISMA 2020 and PROSPERO registration (CRD42025633104), major databases were searched through January 2025 for RCTs comparing various cupping modalities to control interventions in adults with chronic neck pain (≥3 months). Primary outcomes were pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS/ Numeric Rating Scale, NRS) and functional disability (NDI); secondary outcomes included quality of life, range of motion, and adverse events.
Results
Nine RCTs involving 401 participants met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed that cupping significantly reduced pain intensity (Cohen's d = 1.17; 95% CI 0.26–2.09; p = 0.002) and produced consistent functional improvements (Cohen's d = 0.77; 95% CI 0.63–0.91; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Secondary outcomes favored cupping, with enhanced quality of life and range of motion. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
Cupping therapy provides consistent, clinically meaningful improvements in functional disability and significant pain relief for adults with chronic neck pain, within an overall evidence base that is stronger for function than for pain and is tempered by methodological limitations in several included trials. This updated synthesis elevates the evidence base, supporting cupping as a function-enhancing adjunct in multidisciplinary management and guiding its integration into clinical practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
