Abstract
Background
Adherence to exercise remains a challenge in rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP).
Objective
This study compared an individualized exercise sequence with a content-matched random sequence on pain, disability, and adherence in adults with chronic RCRSP.
Methods
In a single-center randomized controlled trial, 55 participants with chronic RCRSP were assigned to an individualized, algorithm-based sequencing protocol or to a random sequence of the same 13 home-based exercises (24 sessions over four weeks). The primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) total score at eight weeks. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, the Korean version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (K-DASH), and range of motion. Adherence, defined as completed cycles, was a key measure.
Results
Forty-eight participants (87.3%) completed the eight-week follow-up. Group baseline characteristics were similar. Intervention fidelity was confirmed, with distinct sequencing patterns between groups (p < 0.05). Adherence was higher in the individualized group (media4.0 cycles) than in the random sequencing group (median 1.0 cycle; p < 0.001). This difference corresponded to greater improvement in the primary outcome and all secondary outcomes across follow-ups (all post hoc p < 0.001). Linear mixed-effects models also showed a steeper rate of functional improvement (K-DASH and range of motion) in the individualized group.
Conclusion
Individualized sequencing was associated with superior adherence and improved outcomes. Interpretation requires caution: the large treatment effect was likely mediated by adherence, and the low compliance in the random sequencing group may not reflect usual practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
