Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is linked to changes in trunk motor control, often presenting as increased movement regularity. Entropy-based metrics quantify such alterations in motor variability, yet evidence remains fragmented.
Objective
The present study aims to systematically review studies employing entropy measures to assess trunk movement regularity in individuals with and without CNLBP.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted across nine databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Cross-sectional studies comparing CNLBP participants to healthy controls were included. Two independent reviewers handled study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment.
Results
Five studies (n =222) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 222 participants in the pooled dataset, 42% were healthy controls and 58% had CNLBP, with an age range of 24.5 to 56.75 years. The weighted mean age across studies was approximately 43 years. Higher entropy (i.e., lower regularity) was observed in postural and gait tasks among CNLBP individuals. Conversely, reduced entropy (i.e., higher regularity) was noted in flexion-extension tasks, highlighting task-specific motor adaptations.
Conclusion
CNLBP is associated with task-dependent alterations in trunk movement regularity. Future research should standardize entropy computation and data collection protocols to enhance study comparability and clinical applicability.
AlfalogyEMahfouzSElmedanyS, et al.Chronic low back pain: prevalence, impact on quality of life, and predictors of future disability. Cureus2023; 15: e45760.
2.
KochCHänselF. Chronic non-specific low back pain and motor control during gait. Front Psychol2018; 9: 2236.
3.
LamothCJCMeijerOGDaffertshoferA, et al.Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control. Eur Spine J2006; 15: 23–40.
4.
YojanaEZahariZBukrySA. Factors that influence motor control in individuals with nonspecific low back pain: a scoping review. Med J Malaysia2024; 79: 209–214.
5.
KosciessaJQKloostermanNAGarrettDD. Standard multiscale entropy reflects neural dynamics at mismatched temporal scales: what’s signal irregularity got to do with it?PLoS Comput Biol2020; 16: e1007885.
6.
Van EmmerikREADucharmeSWAmadoAC, et al.Comparing dynamical systems concepts and techniques for biomechanical analysis. J Sport Health Sci2016; 5: 3–13.
7.
ThiryPNocentOBuisseretF, et al.Sample entropy as a tool to assess Lumbo-Pelvic movements in a clinical test for low-back-pain patients. Entropy2022; 24: 37.
8.
EskandariAHGhezelbashFShirazi-AdlA, et al.Comparative evaluation of different spinal stability metrics. J Biomech2024; 162: 111901.
9.
PiergiovanniSTerrierP. Validity of linear and nonlinear measures of gait variability to characterize aging gait with a single lower back accelerometer. Sensors2024; 24: 7427.
10.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: 71.
11.
BoothAMitchellASMottA, et al.An assessment of the extent to which the contents of PROSPERO records meet the systematic review protocol reporting items in PRISMA-P. F1000Res2020; 9: 73.
12.
HelbachJPieperDMathesT, et al.Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study. BMC Med Res Methodol2022; 22: 30.
13.
CumpstonMLiTPageMJ, et al.Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2019; 10: ED000142.
14.
MaLLWangYYYangZH, et al.Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?Mil Med Res2020; 7: 7.
15.
MoolaSMunnZSearsK, et al.Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): the Joanna Briggs Institute’s approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc2015; 13: 163–169.
16.
MuradMHMustafaRASchünemannHJ, et al.Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect. Evid Based Med2017; 22: 85–87.
17.
HartlingLFernandesRMSeidaJ, et al.From the trenches: a cross-sectional study applying the GRADE tool in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. PLoS ONE2012; 7: e34697.
18.
SchünemannHJCuelloCAklEA, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol2019; 111: 105–114.
19.
BauerCMRastFMErnstMJ, et al.The effect of muscle fatigue and low back pain on lumbar movement variability and complexity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2017; 33: 94–102.
20.
NishiYShigetohHFujiiR, et al.Changes in trunk variability and stability of gait in patients with chronic low back pain: impact of laboratory versus daily-living environments. J Pain Res2021; 14: 1675–1686.
21.
OliosiEJúlioAProbstP, et al.Exploring the real-time variability and complexity of sitting patterns in office workers with non-specific chronic spinal pain and pain-free individuals. Sensors2024; 24: 4750.
22.
ShokouhyanSMDavoudiMHoviattalabM, et al.Linear and non-linear dynamic methods toward investigating proprioception impairment in non-specific low back pain patients. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2020; 8: 584952.
23.
ShokouhyanSMDavoudiMHoviattalabM, et al.Distinction of non-specific low back pain patients with proprioceptive disorders from healthy individuals by linear discriminant analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2022; 10: 1078805.
24.
BauerCMRastFMErnstMJ, et al.The effect of muscle fatigue and low back pain on lumbar movement variability and complexity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2017; 33: 94–102.
25.
OliosiEJúlioAProbstP, et al.Exploring the real-time variability and complexity of sitting patterns in office workers with non-specific chronic spinal pain and pain-free individuals. Sensors2024; 24: 4750.
26.
NishiYShigetohHFujiiR, et al.Changes in trunk variability and stability of gait in patients with chronic low back pain: impact of laboratory versus daily-living environments. J Pain Res2021; 14: 1675–1686.
27.
StergiouNDeckerLM. Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection?Hum Mov Sci2011; 30: 869–888.
28.
HodgesPW. Pain and motor control: from the laboratory to rehabilitation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2011; 21: 220–228.
29.
TangLLvHYangF, et al.Complexity testing techniques for time series data: a comprehensive literature review. Chaos Solitons Fractals2015; 81: 117–135.
30.
YinLChenKGuoL, et al.Identifying the functional flexion-extension axis of the knee: an in-vivo kinematics study. PLoS ONE2015; 10: e0128877.
31.
RaffaltPCYentesJMFreitasSR, et al.Calculating sample entropy from isometric torque signals: methodological considerations and recommendations. Front Physiol2023; 14: 1173702.
32.
RaffaltPCMcCamleyJDentonW, et al.Sampling frequency influences sample entropy of kinematics during walking. Med Biol Eng Comput2019; 57: 759–764.
