Preload is known to improve spinal stability; however, its effect on the voluntary contraction of lumbar muscles needs investigation. This study aimed to investigate the role of preload in enhancing the voluntary contraction of lumbar muscles in a group of young men.
Methods
Twenty healthy participants successively participated in experiments with the following preload conditions arranged in random order: no preload, forward preload, backward preload, or right-hand-pull preload. Preload intensity was set to 20% and 40% of the maximum load forces, and the participants voluntarily co-activated their trunk muscles while seated. Surface electromyography signals were recorded for analysis.
Results
Forward preload was able to increase the maximal voluntary contraction strength of lumbar muscles, an effect enhanced with greater preload intensity. Backward preload reduced the maximal voluntary contraction strength of lumbar muscles as preload intensity increased. Right-hand-pull preload exhibited some asymmetrical characteristics.
Discussion
During co-activation of the trunk muscles, preload demonstrated different effects on the voluntary contraction strength of lumbar muscles in a group of young men. As forward preload enhanced the voluntary contraction of lumbar muscles, it may play a significant role in stabilising the spine. Backward preload may also have a stabilising effect on the spine, but more research is required.
YangYLiuSLingM, et al.Prevalence and potential risk factors for occupational low back pain among male military pilots: a study based on questionnaire and physical function assessment. Front Public Health2021; 9: 744601.
2.
PoschMSchranzALenerM, et al.Prevalence and potential risk factors of flight-related neck, shoulder and low back pain among helicopter pilots and crewmembers: a questionnaire-based study. Bmc Musculoskelet Disord2019; 20: 44.
3.
HoriYHoshinoMInageK, et al.Gender-specific analysis for the association between trunk muscle mass and spinal pathologies. Sci Rep2021; 11: 7816.
4.
SilvaBGelainGMCandottiCT. The influence of physical exercise on behavioral habits, kinesiophobia, and disability in people with low back pain: a retrospective cross-sectional study. J Bodyw Mov Ther2021; 28: 348–353.
5.
KangSChangMCKimH, et al.The effects of paraspinal muscle volume on physiological load on the lumbar vertebral column: a finite-element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2021; 46: E1015–E1021.
6.
ShahvarpourAShirazi-AdlAMecheriH, et al.Trunk response to sudden forward perturbations – effects of preload and sudden load magnitudes, posture and abdominal antagonistic activation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2014; 24: 394–403.
7.
SerpellBGBallNBScarvellJM, et al.Muscle pre-activation strategies play a role in modulating Kvert for change of direction manoeuvres: an observational study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2014; 24: 704–710.
8.
SchaeferLVBittmannFN. Muscular pre-activation can boost the maximal explosive eccentric adaptive force. Front Physiol2019; 10: 910.
9.
ReedWRLongCRKawchukGN, et al.Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2014; 37: 68–78.
10.
MehrezSSmaouiH. Directional dependence of experimental trunk stiffness: role of muscle-stiffness variation of nonneural origin. Appl Bionics Biomech2020; 2020: 1–10.
11.
MorenoCMSchrollALaubeG, et al.Muscle strength and neuromuscular control in low-back pain: elite athletes versus general population. Front Neurosci2018; 12: 436.
12.
JakobsenMDBrandtMSundstrupE, et al.Reliability of mechanical trunk responses during known and unknown trunk perturbations. J Appl Biomech2016; 32: 86–92.
13.
PanjabiMM. Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2003; 13: 371–379.
14.
WidmerJCornazFScheiblerG, et al.Biomechanical contribution of spinal structures to stability of the lumbar spine—novel biomechanical insights. Spine J2020; 20: 1705–1716.
15.
MeierMLVranaASchweinhardtP. Low back pain: the potential contribution of supraspinal motor control and proprioception. Neuroscientist2019; 25: 583–596.
16.
NandlallNRivazHRizkA, et al.The effect of low back pain and lower limb injury on lumbar multifidus muscle morphology and function in university soccer players. Bmc Musculoskelet Disord2020; 21: 96.
17.
PanjabiMM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord1992; 5: 383–389, 397.
18.
BojairamiIEDriscollM. Coordination between trunk muscles, thoracolumbar fascia, and intra-abdominal pressure toward static spine stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2022; 47: E423–E431.
19.
HodgesPW. Core stability exercise in chronic low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am2003; 34: 245–254.
20.
AgtenAVerbruggheJStevensS, et al.Feasibility, accuracy and safety of a percutaneous fine-needle biopsy technique to obtain qualitative muscle samples of the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscle in persons with low back pain. J Anat2018; 233: 542–551.
21.
EkşiMŞÖzcan EkşiEE. Fatty infiltration of the erector spinae at the upper lumbar spine could be a landmark for low back pain. Pain Pract2024; 24(2): 278–287.
22.
WattananonPSilfiesSPTretriluxanaJ, et al.Lumbar Multifidus and erector spinae muscle synergies in patients with nonspecific low back pain during prone hip extension: a cross-sectional study. Pm R2019; 11: 694–702.
CollocaCJKellerTS. Active trunk extensor contributions to dynamic posteroanterior lumbar spinal stiffness. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2004; 27: 229–237.
25.
LeePJRogersELGranataKP. Active trunk stiffness increases with co-contraction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2006; 16: 51–57.
26.
VetteAHMasaniKWuN, et al.Multidirectional quantification of trunk stiffness and damping during unloaded natural sitting. Med Eng Phys2014; 36: 102–109.
27.
Drzał-GrabiecJSnelaSRachwałM, et al.Effects of carrying a backpack in an asymmetrical manner on the asymmetries of the trunk and parameters defining lateral flexion of the spine. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergonom Soc2015; 57: 218–226.
28.
LiuJQuXLiuY. Influence of load knowledge on biomechanics of asymmetric lifting. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 3207.
29.
SuehiroTIshidaHKobaraK, et al.Immediate changes in trunk muscle activation patterns during a lifting task following an abdominal drawing-in exercise in subjects with recurrent low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2021; 34: 77–85.
30.
WangHZhengJFanZ, et al.Impaired static postural control correlates to the contraction ability of trunk muscle in young adults with chronic non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture2022; 92: 44–50.
31.
OwenPJMillerCTMundellNL, et al.Evidence for integrating exercise training into the multidisciplinary management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Aust J Gen Pract2021; 50: 144–147.
32.
KuligowskiTCieślikBKucielN, et al.Effect of core stabilizing training on young individuals presenting different stages of degenerative disc disease—preliminary report. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 3499.
33.
BartolomeiSFukudaDHHoffmanJR, et al.The influence of isometric preload on power expressed during bench press in strength-trained men. Eur J Sport Sci2017; 17: 195–199.
