Rotator cuff (RC) disorders are common musculoskeletal conditions causing shoulder pain and functional loss. While abdominal muscles aid in core stabilization and force transmission, their strength, endurance, and thickness in RC disorders remain underexplored.
Objectives
This study aimed to examine the differences in abdominal muscle performance between individuals with RC pathology and healthy controls and to evaluate the relationship of these parameters with pain, disability and quality of life.
Materials and Method
This cross-sectional study evaluated 128 individuals (RC group: 64; control group: 64). The strength of the abdominal muscles was evaluated, and the McGill endurance test was performed. Muscle thickness was measured using ultrasound imaging. Shoulder-related pain, symptoms and functionality were assessed with Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index.
Results
The RC group exhibited significantly lower abdominal muscle strength and endurance compared to controls (p < 0.001). A moderate negative correlation was observed between abdominal muscle performance and clinical scores. According to ultrasound evaluations, patients with right-sided shoulder pathology (RSSP) had thinner EO (p < 0.001) and TrA (p = 0.016) muscles on the affected side, while left-sided shoulder pathology (LSSP) showed similar reductions in RA (p = 0.001), EO (p = 0.012), and TrA (p = 0.006) thickness. The RC group showed significantly greater percentage asymmetry in RA muscle thickness compared with controls (p= 0.02), while no statistically significant differences were found for EO, IO, or TrA muscles.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that decreased abdominal muscle function and thickness are associated with RC disorders. We emphasize that core stability exercises should be included in rotator cuff rehabilitation.
VeegerHEJVan Der HelmFCT. Shoulder function: the perfect compromise between mobility and stability. J Biomech2007; 40: 2119–2129.
2.
WilliamsonPMHannaPMomenzadehK, et al.Effect of rotator cuff muscle activation on glenohumeral kinematics: a cadaveric study. J Biomech2020; 105: 109798.
3.
TeunisTLubbertsBReillyBT, et al.Sstematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 1913–1921.
4.
SungPS. A kinematic analysis for shoulder and pelvis coordination during axial trunk rotation in subjects with and without recurrent low back pain. Gait Posture2014; 40: 493–498.
5.
EllenbeckerTSAokiR. Step by step guide to understanding the kinetic chain concept in the overhead athlete. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med2020; 13: 155–163.
6.
KnudsonDElliottB. Biomechanics of tennis strokes. In: HungGKPallisJM (eds) Biomedical engineering principles in sports. 1st ed. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 2004, pp. 153–181. 10.1007/978-1-4419-8887-4_7.
7.
Sanchis-MoysiJIdoateFÁlamo-ArceD, et al.The core musculature in male prepubescent tennis players and untrained counterparts: a volumetric MRI study. J Sports Sci2017; 35: 791–797.
8.
SilfiesSPEbaughDPontilloM, et al.Critical review of the impact of core stability on upper extremity athletic injury and performance. Br J Phys Ther2015; 19: 360–368.
9.
KiblerWBPressJSciasciaA. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med2006; 36: 189–198.
10.
FriedliWGHallettMSimonS. Postural adjustments associated with rapid voluntary arm movements 1. Electromyographic data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1984; 47: 611–622.
11.
KayaT. Eklemlerin, kasların, motor ve duyusal İşlevlerin değerlendirilmesi. In: BeyazovaMKutsalYG (eds) Fiziksel tıp ve rehabilitasyon. 3rd ed. Ankara, Türkiye: Güneş Tıp Kitapevleri, 2016, pp.241–256.
12.
McgillSMChildsALiebensonC. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 941–944.
13.
RoachKEBudiman-MakESongsiridejN, et al.Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)1991; 4: 143–149.
14.
KirkleyAGriffinSDaintyK. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. J Arthrosc Related Surg2003; 19: 1109–1120.
15.
MannionAFPulkovskiNGublerD, et al.Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J2008; 17: 494–501.
16.
TahanNKhademi-KalantariKMohseni-BandpeiMA, et al.Measurement of superficial and deep abdominal muscle thickness: an ultrasonography study. J Physiol Anthropol2016; 35: 17.
17.
PirriCTodrosSFedeC, et al.Inter-rater reliability and variability of ultrasound measurements of abdominal muscles and fasciae thickness. Clin Anat2019; 32: 948–960.
18.
DoranMÖneşKTerzibaşioğluAM, et al.Ultrasonographic evaluation of abdominal muscle thickness symmetry in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2021; 57: 968–976.
19.
YörükoğluAÇŞavkınRBükerN, et al.Is there a relation between rotator cuff injury and core stability?J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2019; 32: 445–452.
20.
RichardsonELewisJSGibsonJ, et al.Role of the kinetic chain in shoulder rehabilitation: does incorporating the trunk and lower limb into shoulder exercise regimes influence shoulder muscle recruitment patterns? Systematic review of electromyography studies. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med2020; 6: e000683.
21.
KiblerWB. Biomechanical analysis of the shoulder during tennis activities. Clin Sports Med1995; 14: 79–85.
22.
ElliottBFleisigGNichollsR, et al.Technique effects on upper limb loading in the tennis serve. J Sci Med Sport2003; 6: 76–87.
23.
CavanaghPRKomiPV. Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol1979; 42: 159–163.
24.
BauerJGruberMMuehlbauerT. Correlations between core muscle strength endurance and upper-extremity performance in adolescent male sub-elite handball players. Front Sports Act Living2022; 10: 1050279.
25.
JangHJKimSYOhDW. Effects of augmented trunk stabilization with external compression support on shoulder and scapular muscle activity and maximum strength during isometric shoulder abduction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2015; 25: 387–391.
26.
ŞahinMErgezenG. Is there any relationship between painful shoulder disorders and balance?East J Med2022; 27: 164–172.
27.
DavisDLAlmardawiRBeamerBA, et al.Shoulder pain, health-related quality of life and physical function in community-dwelling older adults. Front Aging2023; 4: 1176706.
28.
NunesEAStokesTMcKendryJ, et al.Disuse-induced skeletal muscle atrophy in disease and nondisease states in humans: mechanisms, prevention, and recovery strategies. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol2022; 322: C1068–C1084.
29.
MarijančićVGrubić KezeleTPeharecS, et al.Relationship between physical activity and sedentary behavior, spinal curvatures, endurance and balance of the trunk muscles-extended physical health analysis in young adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health2023; 20: 6938.
30.
ParamanidisNKabasakalisAKoutlianosN, et al.Shoulder pain and trunk muscles endurance in young male and female swimmers. Healthcare (Basel)2023; 11: 2145.
31.
MineKMilaneseSJonesMA, et al.Risk factors of shoulder and elbow injuries in baseball: a scoping review of 3 types of evidence. Orthop J Sports Med2021; 9: 23259671211064645.
32.
de Oliveira ScatolinRHottaGHCoolsAM, et al.Effect of conscious abdominal contraction on the activation of periscapular muscles in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. Clin Biomech2021; 84: 105349.
33.
BurkhartSSMorganCDKiblerWB. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology part III: the SICK scapula, scapular dyskinesis, the kinetic chain, and rehabilitation. J Arthrosc Related Surg2003; 19: 641–661.
34.
HodgesPWRichardsonCA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine1996; 21: 2640–2650.
35.
MyersJBWassingerCALephartSM. Sensorimotor contribution to shoulder stability: effect of injury and rehabilitation. Man Ther2006; 11: 197–201.
36.
SterlingMJullGWrightA. The effect of musculoskeletal pain on motor activity and control. J Pain2001; 2: 135–145.
37.
McMeekenJMBeithIDNewhamDJ, et al.The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis. Clin Biomech2004; 19: 337–342.
38.
BrianiRVWaitemanMCde AlbuquerqueCE, et al.Lower trunk muscle thickness is associated with pain in women with patellofemoral pain. J Ultrasound Med2019; 38: 2685–2693.
39.
KangKWKwonYHSonMS. Research C. Ultrasound measurement of the transverse abdominis, internal oblique, and external oblique muscles associated with forward head posture and reduced cranio-vertebral angle. Med Sci Monit2021; 27: e928987-1.
40.
AdamsLPaceNHeoA, et al.Internal and external oblique muscle asymmetry in sprint hurdlers and sprinters: a cross-sectional study. J Sports Sci Med2022; 21: 120–126.
41.
RankinGStokesMNewhamDJ. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve2006; 34: 320–326.
42.
RhoMSpitznagleTVan DillenL, et al.Gender differences on ultrasound imaging of lateral abdominal muscle thickness in asymptomatic adults: a pilot study. PM&R J Injury Function Rehabil2013; 5: 374–380.
43.
SpringerBAMielcarekBJNesfieldTK, et al.Relationships among lateral abdominal muscles, gender, body mass index, and hand dominance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2006; 36: 289–297.
44.
ToftILindalSBønaaKH, et al.Quantitative measurement of muscle fiber composition in a normal population. Muscle Nerve2003; 28: 101–108.
