Prehabilitation aims to optimize patients’ physical and psychological status before spine surgery to enhance recovery. However, its effectiveness on postoperative outcomes remains remains to be controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate Prehabilitation impact on pain, functional recovery, psychological status, and perioperative outcomes.
Methods
A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase was conducted through January 2025 using PRISMA guidelines. A total of 5738 records were initially identified through database searches, of which 3765 remained after duplicate removal. Studies comparing postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery with and without prehabilitation were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses based on exercise inclusion.
Results
According to our inclusion criteria, twenty-seven studies (2449 participants) were deemed appropriate to be included in our study. Our meta-analysis showed prehabilitation significantly reduced postoperative back pain (SMD = –0.4028, p = 0.0269) and improved trunk muscle strength (SMD = 0.1472, p = 0.0142). However, no significant differences were observed for disability (SMD = –0.3772, p-value = 0.5705), quality of life (SMD = 0.0657, p-value = 0.5372), and leg pain (SMD = –0.1921, p-value = 0.3920). In addition, depression, operation time, blood loss, or length of stay were shown to be comparable between the two groups of patients.
Conclusions
Prehabilitation may reduce postoperative back pain and improve muscle function, but does not significantly impact disability, quality of life, or perioperative outcomes. Future research should refine protocols and identify patient subgroups that benefit most from prehabilitation.
BrunsERJvan RooijenSJArgillanderTE, et al.Improving outcomes in oncological colorectal surgery by prehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2019; 98: 231–238.
2.
Guerra-LondonoCECataJPNowakK,et al.Prehabilitation in adults undergoing cancer surgery: a comprehensive review on rationale, methodology, and measures of effectiveness. Curr Oncol2024; 31: 2185–2200.
3.
Coca-MartinezMCarliF. Prehabilitation: who can benefit?Eur J Surg Oncol2024; 50: 106979.
4.
EubanksJECarlessoCSundaramM, et al.Prehabilitation for spine surgery: a scoping review. Pm r2023; 15: 1335–1350.
5.
MiralpeixEManceboGGayeteS, et al.Role and impact of multimodal prehabilitation for gynecologic oncology patients in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Int J Gynecol Cancer2019; 29: 1235–1243.
6.
BoukiliIEFlarisANMercierF, et al.Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: evaluation of the impact of a perioperative clinical pathway, a pilot study. Scand J Surg2022; 111: 14574969221083394.
7.
YamikanHAhiskaliGNDemirelA,et al.The effects of exercise-based prehabilitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Heart Lung2025; 69: 41–50.
8.
ForsMÖbergBLindbäckY, et al.What mediates treatment effects in a presurgery physiotherapy treatment in surgical candidates with degenerative lumbar spine disorders? A mediation and conditional process analysis of the PREPARE randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain2021; 37: 168–176.
9.
AltuwaijriT. Prehabilitation to enhance vascular surgery outcomes: a narrative review. Cureus2024; 16: e70200.
10.
PunnooseAClaydon-MuellerLSWeissO, et al.Prehabilitation for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open2023; 6: e238050.
11.
GuidaSVitaleJASwinnenE, et al.Effects of prehabilitation with advanced technologies in patients with musculoskeletal diseases waiting for surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. . J Med Internet Res2024; 26: e52943.
12.
JanssenERPuntIMClemensMJ, et al.Current prehabilitation programs do not improve the postoperative outcomes of patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy2021; 51: 103–114.
13.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br Med J2009; 339: b2535.
14.
OuzzaniMHammadyHFedorowiczZ,et al.Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev2016; 5: 210.
15.
StangA. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol2010; 25: 603–605.
16.
SterneJACSavovicJPageMJ, et al.Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2019; 366: l4898.
17.
ChavezJLPorucznikCAGrenLH, et al.The impact of preoperative mindfulness-based stress reduction on postoperative patient-reported pain, disability, quality of life, and prescription opioid use in lumbar spine degenerative disease: three-and twelve-month results. Neurosurgery2019; 66: 310–115.
18.
EastwoodDMansonNBigneyE, et al.Improving postoperative patient reported benefits and satisfaction following spinal fusion with a single preoperative education session. Spine J2019; 19: 840–845.
19.
EdwardsRGibsonJMungin-JenkinsE, et al.A preoperative spinal education intervention for spinal fusion surgery designed using the rehabilitation treatment specification system is safe and could reduce hospital length of stay, normalize expectations, and reduce anxiety: a prospective cohort study. Bone & Joint Open2022; 3: 135–144.
20.
EubanksJECuplerZAGliedtJA, et al.Preoperative spinal education for lumbar spinal stenosis: A feasibility study. PM&R2024; 16: 992–1000.
21.
ForsMEnthovenPAbbottA,et al.Effects of pre-surgery physiotherapy on walking ability and lower extremity strength in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: secondary outcomes of the PREPARE randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2019; 20: 1–11.
22.
GautschiOPStienenMNHermannC, et al.Web-based audiovisual patient information system—a study of preoperative patient information in a neurosurgical department. Acta Neurochir2010; 152: 1337–1341.
23.
JankowskiPPTretiakovPSOnafowokanOO, et al.Assessing the effects of prehabilitation protocols on post-operative outcomes in adult cervical deformity surgery: does early optimization lead to optimal clinical outcomes?Spine Deform2024; 12: 1107–1113.
24.
JanssenERPuntIMBiemansCF, et al.Preoperative community based functional high intensity interval training (f-HIIT) with high-risk patients opting for lumbar spinal fusion: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil2023; 45: 805–813.
25.
JuneyoungLYPorucznikCAGrenLH, et al.The impact of preoperative mindfulness-based stress reduction on postoperative patient-reported pain, disability, quality of life, and prescription opioid use in lumbar spine degenerative disease: a pilot study. World Neurosurg2019; 121: e786–ee91.
26.
KemaniMKHanafiRBrisbyH, et al.Long-Term follow-up of a person-centered prehabilitation program based on cognitive-behavioral physical therapy for patients scheduled for lumbar fusion. Phys Ther2024; 104: pzae069.
27.
KesänenJLeino-KilpiHLundT, et al.The knowledge test feedback intervention (KTFI) increases knowledge level of spinal stenosis patients before operation—a randomized controlled follow-up trial. Patient Educ Couns2016; 99: 1984–1991.
28.
LindbäckYTroppHEnthovenP, et al.PREPARE: presurgery physiotherapy for patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J2018; 18: 1347–1355.
29.
LotzkeHBrisbyHGutkeA, et al.A person-centered prehabilitation program based on cognitive-behavioral physical therapy for patients scheduled for lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther2019; 99: 1069–1088.
30.
LouwADienerILandersMR,et al.Preoperative pain neuroscience education for lumbar radiculopathy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Philadelphia, PA, USA: LWW, 2014.
31.
LouwADienerILandersMR, et al.Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative neuroscience education for patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. J Spine Surg2016; 2: 289.
32.
LuJGuoKLiuEZ, et al.The impact of preoperative adaptive training on postoperative outcomes in lumbar spine fusion surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective analysis. J Pain Res2024; 17: 73–81.
33.
MarchandA-AHouleMO’ShaughnessyJ, et al.Effectiveness of an exercise-based prehabilitation program for patients awaiting surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep2021; 11: 11080.
34.
MarchandA-ASuitnerMO’ShaughnessyJ, et al.Feasibility of conducting an active exercise prehabilitation program in patients awaiting spinal stenosis surgery: a randomized pilot study. Sci Rep2019; 9: 12257.
35.
NielsenPRAndreasenJAsmussenM,et al.Costs and quality of life for prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after surgery of the lumbar spine. BMC Health Serv Res2008; 8: –7.
36.
NielsenPRJørgensenLDDahlB, et al.Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation after spinal surgery: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil2010; 24: 137–148.
37.
PapanastassiouIAndersonRBarberN, et al.Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients. SAS J2011; 5: 120–124.
38.
RolvingNNielsenCVChristensenFB, et al.Does a preoperative cognitive-behavioural intervention affect disability, pain behaviour, pain and return to work after lumbar spinal fusion. 2015.
39.
RolvingNNielsenCVChristensenFB, et al.Preoperative cognitive-behavioural intervention improves in-hospital mobilisation and analgesic use for lumbar spinal fusion patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2016; 17: –7.
40.
SkolaskyRLMaggardAMLiD, et al.Health behavior change counseling in surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: patient activation mediates the effects of health behavior change counseling on rehabilitation engagement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96: 1208–1214.
41.
SkolaskyRLMaggardAMWegenerST,et al.Telephone-based intervention to improve rehabilitation engagement after spinal stenosis surgery: a prospective lagged controlled trial. JBJS2018; 100: 21–30.
42.
StrømJNielsenCVJørgensenLB, et al.A web-based platform to accommodate symptoms of anxiety and depression by featuring social interaction and animated information in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion: a randomized clinical trial. Spine J2019; 19: 827–839.
43.
WeiJLiFSunJ, et al.Modified tracheal traction exercise reduces the incidence of dysphagia in patients with multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Orthop Surg2024; 16: 2391–2400.
44.
JanssenERCPuntIMClemensMJ, et al.Current prehabilitation programs do not improve the postoperative outcomes of patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2021; 51: 103–114.
45.
ReyesJKatiyarPGreisbergG, et al.Preoperative nutritional optimization for adult spinal deformity. Rev Spine Deform2024; 12: 257–262.
46.
MohamedBRamachandranRRabaiF, et al.Frailty assessment and prehabilitation before Complex spine surgery in patients with degenerative spine disease. A Narrat Rev J Neurosurg Anesthesiol2023; 35: 19–30.
47.
KatiyarPReyesJCouryJ, et al.Preoperative optimization for adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024; 49: 304–312.
48.
TarnanenSNevaMHKautiainenH, et al.The early changes in trunk muscle strength and disability following lumbar spine fusion. Disabil Rehabil2013; 35: 134–139.
49.
MarchandAAHouleMO'ShaughnessyJ, et al.Effectiveness of an exercise-based prehabilitation program for patients awaiting surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep2021; 11: 11080.
50.
ZhengFCammisaFPSandhuJ, et al.Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2002; 27: 818–824.
51.
EpsteinNE. A review article on the benefits of early mobilization following spinal surgery and other medical/surgical procedures. Surg Neurol Int2014; 5: 66.
