Cervical stenosis is an important problem in patients with cervical pain, which may cause proprioception problems.
Objective
This study aims to evaluate the effect of the degree of cervical stenosis on cervical proprioception and cervical range of motion (ROM).
Method
A total of 111 patients presenting with cervical pain and undergoing cervical magnetic resonance imaging were included in the study. The ROM of the patients was measured with the Pa Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device. Proprioception was evaluated with measurement of joint position error (JPE). JPE was assessed with neutral head position and target head position tests. The severity of stenosis was detected according to the Kang grading system. The Kruskal-Wallis test is used to compare joint position error in patients with different cervical stenosis stages.
Results
Twenty nine(%26) patients had no stenosis, 31 (28%) had mild stenosis, 31 (28%) had moderate stenosis, and 20 (18%) had severe stenosis. According to the neutral head positioning test, there was a significant difference in right lateral flexion between patients with different degrees of stenosis (grade 0: 1.67[0.67–4.67] vs. grade 2: 4.67[2.3–10.0], p = 0.009) and in flexion (grade 0: 8.0[2.67–10.0] vs. grade 3: 12.66[8.33–17.67], p = 0.011). There was also a significant difference in head-to-target JPEs in all motion planes(p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Degree of cervical stenosis significantly affects cervical proprioception and cervical ROM. The study's findings may guide clinicians in developing effective rehabilitation programs for proprioception in cervical stenosis and encourage further research on intervention effects at different stages of the disease.
CohenSP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc2015; 90: 284–299.
2.
HoyDGProtaniMDeR, et al.The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol2010; 24: 783–792.
3.
MeyerFBörmWThoméC. Degenerative cervical spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int2008; 105: 366.
4.
FotakopoulosGGeorgakopoulouVELempesisIG, et al.Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy. Biomed Rep2023; 19: 84.
5.
TetreaultLKalsi-RyanSDaviesB, et al.Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a practical approach to diagnosis. Global Spine J2022; 12: 1881–1893.
6.
HanJWaddingtonGAdamsR, et al.Assessing proprioception: a critical review of methods. J Sport Health Sci2016; 5: 80–90.
7.
RivaDBianchiRRoccaF, et al.Proprioceptive training and injury prevention in a professional men’s basketball team: a six-year prospective study. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30: 461–475.
Boyd-ClarkLCBriggsCAGaleaMP. Muscle spindle distribution, morphology, and density in longus colli and multifidus muscles of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2002; 27: 694–701.
10.
LiuJXThornellLEPedrosa-DomellöfF. Muscle spindles in the deep muscles of the human neck: a morphological and immunocytochemical study. J Histochem Cytochem2003; 51: 175–186.
11.
YilmazKSertOAUnuvarBS, et al.Comparison of head posture and neck proprioceptive sense of individuals with chronic neck pain and healthy controls: a cross-sectional study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2024; 37: 1705–1713.
12.
ArimiSAGhamkharLKahlaeeAH. The relevance of proprioception to chronic neck pain: a correlational analysis of flexor muscle size and endurance, clinical neck pain characteristics, and proprioception. Pain Med2018; 19: 2077–2088.
13.
PengBYangLLiY, et al.Cervical proprioception impairment in neck pain-pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management: a narrative review. Pain Ther2021; 10: 143–164.
14.
FreppelSBisdorffAColnat-CoulboisS, et al.Visuo-proprioceptive interactions in degenerative cervical spine diseases requiring surgery. Neuroscience2013; 255: 226–232.
15.
TakayamaHMuratsuHDoitaM, et al.Impaired joint proprioception in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2005; 30: 83–86.
16.
KangYLeeJWKohYH, et al.New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis. Am J Roentgenol2011; 197: W134–W140.
17.
LeeKHParkHJLeeSY, et al.Inter-observer reliability and clinical validity of the MRI grading system for cervical central stenosis based on sagittal T2-weighted image. Eur J Radiol2020: 127: 108987.
18.
HuskissonEC. Measurement of pain. Lancet1974; 304: 1127–1131.
19.
BoonstraAMSchiphorst PreuperHRRenemanMF, et al.Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res2008; 31: 165–169.
20.
BijurPESilverWGallagherEJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med2001; 8: 1153–1157.
21.
AkhterSZafarHAhmadA, et al.Intrarater reliability of cervical range of motion device among adults with and without chronic non-specific neck pain. J Pak Med Assoc2023; 73: 2017–2022.
22.
AudetteIDumasJPCôtéJN, et al.Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2010; 40: 318–323.
23.
HumphreysBK. Cervical outcome measures: testing for postural stability and balance. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2008; 31: 540–546.
24.
AlDahasAHeneghanNRAlthobaitiS, et al.Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without neck pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2024; 25: 44.
25.
CerinaVTesioLMalloggiC, et al.Cervical proprioception assessed through targeted head repositioning: validation of a clinical test based on optoelectronic measures. Brain Sci2023; 13: 604.
26.
AlshahraniAGhulamHSHAlqhtaniRS, et al.Cervical health parameters in car drivers: assessing the influence of driving on neck pain, mobility, proprioception and craniovertebral angle - A cross-sectional study. J Multidiscip Healthc2024; 17: 2013–2020.
27.
ReddyRSAlahmariKASilvianPS. Test-retest reliability of assessing cervical proprioception using cervical range of motion device. Saudi J Sports Med2016; 16: 118–123.
28.
WibaultJVaillantJVuillermeN, et al.Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals. Man Ther2013; 18: 403–409.
29.
TreleavenJ. Dizziness, unsteadiness, visual disturbances, and sensorimotor control in traumatic neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2017; 47: 492–502.
30.
RöijezonUClarkNCTreleavenJ. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 1: basic science and principles of assessment and clinical interventions. Man Ther2015; 20: 368–377.
31.
RaizahAReddyRSAlshahraniMS, et al.A cross-sectional study on mediating effect of chronic pain on the relationship between cervical proprioception and functional balance in elderly individuals with chronic neck pain: mediation analysis study. J Clin Med2023; 12: 3140.
32.
ŞekerözSAslan TelciEAkkayaN. Effect of chronic neck pain on balance, cervical proprioception, head posture, and deep neck flexor muscle endurance in the elderly. Turk Geriatri Derg2019; 22: 163–171.
33.
FerlincAFabianiEVelnarT, et al.The importance and role of proprioception in the elderly: a short review. Mater Sociomed2019; 31: 219.
34.
AnwarMZBatoolUShahwaizM, et al.Association of cervical proprioception and balance among vestibular dysfunction patients; a cross sectional study. Insights-J Health Rehabil2024; 2): 440–449.
35.
ReddyRSAlkhamisBAKirmaniJA, et al.Age-Related decline in cervical proprioception and its correlation with functional mobility and limits of stability assessed using computerized posturography: a cross-sectional study comparing older (65+ years) and younger adults. Healthcare (Switzerland)2023; 11: 1924.
KulkarniVChandyMJBabuKS. Quantitative study of muscle spindles in suboccipital muscles of human foetuses. Neurol India2001; 49: 355–359.
38.
LiYYangLDaiC,et al.Proprioceptive cervicogenic dizziness: a narrative review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. J Clin Med2022; 11: 6293.
39.
NtenezakosNMakrogkikasMDimitriadisZ, et al.Neck proprioception assessment with a laser beam device: reliability in participants without neck pain and differences between participants with and without neck pain. Bull Fac Phys Ther2021; 26: 1–9.
40.
WangJWangRZhaoP, et al.The reliability and validity of a novel wearable inertial sensor to measure the cervical proprioception. Med Eng Phys2024; 125: 104125.
41.
ReddyRAlahmariK. Cervical proprioception evaluation using cervical range of motion device: a narrative review. Saudi J Sport Med2015; 15: 127.
42.
ReddyRSTedlaJSDixitS, et al.Cervical proprioception and its relationship with neck pain intensity in subjects with cervical spondylosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2019; 20: 447.
43.
Gallego IzquierdoTPecos-MartinDLluch GirbésE, et al.Comparison of cranio-cervical flexion training versus cervical proprioception training in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Rehabil Med2016; 48: 48–55.
44.
FatimaAVeqarZZaidiS, et al.Effects of scapular stabilization and upper limb proprioception as an adjunct to cervical stabilization in chronic neck pain patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther2022; 29: 291–301.
45.
OhTLafageRLafageV, et al.Comparing quality of life in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with other chronic debilitating diseases using the short form survey 36-health survey. World Neurosurg2017; 106: 699–706.
46.
ApaydinASGüneşM. Relationships between stenosis severity, functional limitation, pain, and quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Turk J Med Sci2024; 54: 727–734.
47.
LeeHNicholsonLLAdamsRD. Cervical range of motion associations with subclinical neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2004; 29: 33–40.
48.
StennebergMSRoodMde BieR, et al.To what degree does active cervical range of motion differ between patients with neck pain, patients with whiplash, and those without neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2017; 98: 1407–1434.
49.
LeeYKimSYKimK. A dynamic magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in severity of cervical spinal stenosis in flexion and extension. Ann Rehabil Med2018; 42: 584–590.
50.
HarinathanBJebaseelanDYoganandanN, et al.Effect of cervical stenosis and rate of impact on risk of spinal cord injury during whiplash injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2023; 48: 1208–1215.
51.
JavanshirKAkbarnejad-BasraZSaadatP, et al.Investigating cervical flexion-relaxation ratio in subjects with cervical lateral spinal stenosis compared with asymptomatic controls: a case control study. J Bodyw Mov Ther2024; 40: 893–898.
52.
ShamsiHKhademi-KalantariKAkbarzadeh-BaghbanA, et al.Cervical flexion relaxation phenomenon in patients with and without non-specific chronic neck pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2021; 34: 461–468.
53.
CaridiJMPumbergerMHughesAP. Cervical radiculopathy: a review. HSS J2011; 7: 265–272.
54.
LanHCHChenHYKuoLC, et al.The shift of segmental contribution ratio in patients with herniated disc during cervical lateral bending. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2014; 15: 273.
55.
HartmanRATishermanREWangC, et al.Mechanical role of the posterior column components in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J2016; 25: 2129–2138.
56.
JaumardNVBaumanJAWeisshaarCL, et al.Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine. J Biomech Eng2011; 133: 071004.
57.
DaffnerSDXinJTaghaviCE, , et al.Cervical segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation as determined with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2009; 34: 2389–2394.
58.
McCaskeyMASchuster-AmftCWirthB, et al.Effects of proprioceptive exercises on pain and function in chronic neck- and low back pain rehabilitation: A systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2014; 15: 382.
