Infant carrying is a common practice among caregivers. Carrying loads such as infant mannequins or bags may alter lower extremity joint angles and induce muscle fatigue in the upper extremities of carriers, including men, women, postpartum women, and women who have not given birth. However, the biomechanical effects of various carrying methods on mothers remain poorly understood.
Objective
This cross-sectional descriptive study compared the effects of unloaded walking with three infant-carrying conditions on gait mechanics.
Methods
Thirty healthy mothers’ gait parameters were recorded using a motion capture system under four conditions: unloaded walking (UW), front-facing carrying (FC), back-facing carrying (BC), and in arms carrying (IA).
Results
Across all infant-carrying conditions, notable changes were observed in gait parameters. The front-facing carrying condition elicited the greatest changes in gait mechanics, particularly in pelvis. The in arms carrying condition exhibited minimal changes in gait compared to the back and front-facing carrying conditions. Significant alterations in gait were observed in all infant-carrying conditions compared to unloaded walking (p < 0.05). The results indicated that ankle (M = 41.15 ± 0.25; M = 24.18 ± 0.29; p = 0.0024), and pelvis (M = 6.15 ± 0.35; M = 9.25 ± 0.45; p = 0.0036) movement patterns led to the greatest deviation in gait among four conditions.
Conclusion
Front-facing carrying imposes the greatest biomechanical and physiological strain while back carrier offers more ergonomically efficient alternative. The in arms carrying method introduces dynamic movement that may affect stability. These findings highlight important considerations for ergonomically optimized infant carriers to support maternal musculoskeletal health and minimize strain.
NorholtHPriceCPhillipsR, et al.Babywearing practices and effects on parental, child physical and psychological health academic journal of pediatrics & neonatology. Acad J Ped Neonatol2022; 11(5): 555876.
2.
SiddickySEckelsJRabenhorstB, et al.Ultrasonographic evaluation of infant hips in the Pavlik harness compared to body-worn commercial baby carriers. Journal of Orthopaedic Research2023; 41: 2495–2500.
3.
AzamanAAimanNIsaM, et al.Effects of baby carrier on wearer’s posture stability. Journal of Mechanical Engineering2017; 4: 107–118.
MannenEMHavensKLKahneyA, et al.Baby-carrying method impacts caregiver postural sway and pain during prolonged standing. J Womens Health Phys Therap2020; 44: 47–53. https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000163
6.
WilliamsLRTurnerPR. Infant carrying as a tool to promote secure attachments in young mothers: comparing intervention and control infants during the still-face paradigm. Infant Behav Dev2020; 58: 101413. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016363831930181X
7.
PisacaneAContinisioPFilosaC, et al.Use of baby carriers to increase breastfeeding duration among term infants: the effects of an educational intervention in Italy. Acta Paediatr2012; 101.
OjukwuCPAnyanwuGEAnekwuEM, et al.Infant carrying methods: correlates and associated musculoskeletal disorders among nursing mothers in Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore)2017; 37: 855–860.
12.
HavensKLJohnsonEVDayEN, et al.Infant carrying in the United States: a survey of current practices, physical and mental health benefits, and challenges of babywearing. J Womens Health Phys Therap2022; 46: 25–34. https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000227
13.
SchmidSStaufferMJägerJ, et al.Sling-based infant carrying affects lumbar and thoracic spine neuromechanics during standing and walking. Gait Posture2019; 67: 172–180.
14.
Wall-SchefflerCMGeigerKSteudel-NumbersKL. Infant carrying: the role of increased locomotory costs in early tool development. Am J Phys Anthropol2007; 133: 841–846.
15.
BrownMBDigby-BowlCJToddSD. Assessing infant carriage systems: ground reaction force implications for gait of the caregiver. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society2018[cited 2023 Jan 26]; 60: 160–171.
16.
SosanyaOMWall-SchefflerCM. Baby carrying positions change walking speed. American Journal of Physical Anthropology2018; 165: 259–260.
17.
Wall-SchefflerCMMyersMJ. Working harder and taking longer: How frontal loads can impact female reproductive costs. In: Columbus, OH, USA: Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 2008.
18.
MbadaCEAdebayoOSOlaogunMO, et al.Infant-carrying techniques: which is a preferred mother-friendly method?Health Care Women Int2022; 43: 535–548.
19.
SidharthanSKehoeCDodwellE. Post-Natal positioning through babywearing: what the orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2020; 2: 131. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2768276524002888
ParkHKShinHKNamKS. Investigation of wearing methods of a baby carrier on muscle activation during trunk flexion-extension in healthy women. Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science2020; 9: 36–42.
22.
WuCYHuangHRWangMJ. Baby carriers: a comparison of traditional sling and front-worn, rear-facing harness carriers. Ergonomics2017; 60: 111–117.
MexiAKafetzakisIKorontziM, et al.Effects of load carriage on postural control and spatiotemporal gait parameters during level and uphill walking. Sensors2023; 23: 609.
28.
BouterseLWall-SchefflerC. Children are not like other loads: a cross-cultural perspective on the influence of burdens and companionship on human walking. PeerJ2018; 6: e5547. https://peerj.com/articles/5547
HallMBoyerERGilletteJC, et al.Medial knee joint loading during stair ambulation and walking while carrying loads. Gait Posture2013; 37: 460–462.
32.
MajumdarDPalMSMajumdarD. Effects of military load carriage on kinematics of gait. Ergonomics2010; 53: 782–791.
33.
YaliHYiyuLHaitaoG, et al.The biomechanics effects of back and front pack load carriage for human locomotion. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation. IEEE, 2012, pp.1621–1626.
Demir BenliM.Physical activity level and musculoskeletal pain in physician mothers after childbirth. Turkish Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021. https://doi.org/10.47447/tjsm.0554
37.
GriffinSDPriceVJ. Living with lifting: mothers’ perceptions of lifting and back strain in childcare. Occupational Therapy International2000; 7: 1–20.
38.
WidyantiARamadhiarAFistaB, et al.The ergonomics of mothering and child care activities (ErgoMOMics) in Indonesia: individual and social factors influencing musculoskeletal symptoms. Work2020; 65: 625–633.
39.
EvensonKRMottolaMFOweKM, et al.Summary of international guidelines for physical activity after pregnancy. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey2014; 69: 407–414.
40.
AtilganEDTuncerA. The effects of breathing exercises in mothers of children with special health care needs:a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation2021; 34: 795–804.
