Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-7
Bilateral training guided by contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for shoulder pain and subluxation in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial
Shoulder pain, subluxation, and motor dysfunction are common issues in hemiplegic patients, which hinder the recovery of upper limb function and have a negative impact on patients’ daily life abilities and quality of life. Current rehabilitation interventions alone can not purposefully address the aforementioned problems, while bilateral training (BT) and contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) can be synergistically coordinated to provide a simultaneous treatment for hemiplegic shoulders.
Objective
This study attempted to treat hemiplegic patients using bilateral training with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (BT-CCFES), aiming to observe the changes of shoulder pain, subluxation, and motor function.
Methods
Thirty-eight individuals who had experienced hemiplegia with shoulder pain and subluxation due to stroke were randomly divided into two groups: a control group and an experimental group consisting of nineteen cases both. Patients in the control group underwent neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy, while those in the experimental group received BT-CCFES. Before and after a four-week treatment period, shoulder subluxation distance (SSD) was measured using a flexible ruler, and the pain level was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, shoulder joint active range of motion (AROM) and the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (UE-FMA) were used to evaluate shoulder motor function.
Results
After four weeks of treatment, there were significant improvements in SSD, VAS, UE-FMA, and AROM in the experimental group (p < 0.001), as well as in the control group (p < 0.05). The changes between the experimental group and control group showed significant differences in SSD (−9.74 ± 6.63 vs −3.58 ± 5.51, p = 0.016), flexion (37.37 ± 14.08 vs 21.05 ± 12.65, p = 0.001), and UE-FMA (15.21 ± 4.30 vs 8.84 ± 4.26, p < 0.001), while the difference in VAS (−1.31 ± 1.34 vs −1.10 ± 1.24, p = 0.619) and abduction (15.00 ± 8.82 vs 10.79 ± 7.86, p = 0.111) was not significant.
Conclusion
BT-CCFES can be used to prevent and treat hemiplegic shoulder subluxation after stroke, improve shoulder and upper limb function, and is superior to NMES except in pain relief.
VillepinteCVermaADimeglioC, et al.Responsiveness of kinematic and clinical measures of upper-limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2021; 64: 101366.
LimaRCMichaelsenSMNascimentoLR, et al.Addition of trunk restraint to home-based modified constraint-induced movement therapy does not bring additional benefits in chronic stroke individuals with mild and moderate upper limb impairments: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation2014; 35: 391–404.
4.
DyerSMordauntDAAdey-WakelingZ. Interventions for post-stroke shoulder pain: an overview of systematic reviews. Int J Gen Med2020; 13: 1411–26.
5.
de MeloCRERibertoMDaPBR, et al.Use of Botulinum toxin as a treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain syndrome: a randomized trial. Toxins (Basel)2023; 15: 327.
6.
NadlerMPaulsM. Shoulder orthoses for the prevention and reduction of hemiplegic shoulder pain and subluxation: systematic review. Clin Rehabil2017; 31: 444–53.
7.
XieHMZhangXTXuL, et al.Magnetic resonance imaging findings in painful hemiplegic shoulder patients with or without subluxation: a retrospective cohort study. Front Neurol2022; 13: 1032676.
8.
LiuSCaoCXieH, et al.Evaluation of supraspinatus muscle changes in the shoulder joint of stroke patients with hemiplegic and shoulder subluxation using ultrasonography: comparison between affected and unaffected sides. J Phys Ther Sci2022; 34: 44–8.
9.
de SireAMoggioLDemecoA, et al.Efficacy of rehabilitative techniques in reducing hemiplegic shoulder pain in stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2022; 65: 101602.
10.
GhaffariMSShariatAHonarpisheR, et al.Concurrent effects of dry needling and electrical stimulation in the management of upper extremity hemiparesis. J Acupunct Meridian Stud2019; 12: 90–4.
11.
DembeleJTriccasLTAmanzonwéLER, et al.Bilateral versus unilateral upper limb training in (sub)acute stroke: a systematic and meta-analysis. S Afr J Physiother2024; 80: 1985.
12.
ChenPMKwongPWHLaiCKYNgSSM. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper limb training in people with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2019; 14: e0216357.
13.
KnutsonJSGunzlerDDWilsonRDChaeJ. Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation improves hand dexterity in chronic hemiparesis: a randomized trial. Stroke2016; 47: 2596–602.
14.
KnutsonJSMakowskiNSHarleyMY, et al.Adding contralaterally controlled electrical stimulation of the Triceps to contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation of the finger extensors reduces upper limb impairment and improves reachable workspace but not dexterity: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2020; 99: 514–21.
15.
KnutsonJSFriedlASHansenKM, et al.Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Trials2022; 23: 397.
16.
ZhengYMaoMCaoYLuX. Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation improves wrist dorsiflexion and upper limb function in patients with early-phase stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med2019; 51: 103–8.
17.
FujimuraKKagayaHItohR, et al.Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for preventing shoulder subluxation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2024; 60: 216–24.
18.
ErsoySPakerNKesiktasFN, et al.Comparison of transcutaneous electrical stimulation and suprascapular nerve blockage for the treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2023; 36: 731–8.
19.
HuynhBPDiCarloJAVoraI, et al.Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the upper extremity fugl-Meyer assessment in individuals with moderate to severe acute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2023; 37: 545–53.
20.
LundquistCBMariboT. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version. Disabil Rehabil2017; 39: 934–9.
21.
KalichmanLRatmanskyM. Underlying pathology and associated factors of hemiplegic shoulder pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2011; 90: 768–80.
22.
Murie-FernandezMCarmona IraguiMGnanakumarV, et al.Painful hemiplegic shoulder in stroke patients: causes and management. Neurologia2012; 27: 234–44.
23.
LinTYShenPCChangKV, et al.Shoulder ultrasound imaging in the post-stroke population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med2023; 55: jrm13432.
24.
PaciMNannettiLTaitiP, et al.Shoulder subluxation after stroke: relationships with pain and motor recovery. Physiother Res Int2007; 12: 95–104.
25.
KumarPMardonMBradleyM, et al.Assessment of glenohumeral subluxation in poststroke hemiplegia: comparison between ultrasound and fingerbreadth palpation methods. Phys Ther2014; 94: 1622–31.
26.
BarlakAUnsalSKayaK, et al.Poststroke shoulder pain in Turkish stroke patients: relationship with clinical factors and functional outcomes. Int J Rehabil Res2009; 32: 309–15.
27.
NoorMBRashidMYounasURathoreFA. Recent advances in the management of hemiplegic shoulder pain. J Pak Med Assoc2022; 72: 1882–4.
28.
SuiMJiangNYanL, et al.Effect of electroacupuncture on shoulder subluxation in poststroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: a sham-controlled study using multidimensional musculoskeletal ultrasound assessment. Pain Res Manag2021; 2021: 5329881.
29.
AryaKNPandianSPuriV. Rehabilitation methods for reducing shoulder subluxation in post-stroke hemiparesis: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil2018; 25: 68–81.
30.
XieSZhangYLiJ, et al.Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for improving motor function after acquired brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2024; 105: 2327–2335.
31.
MohanAKnutsonJSCunninghamDA, et al.Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation combined with brain stimulation for severe upper limb hemiplegia-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol2022; 13: 869733.
32.
CunninghamDAKnutsonJSSankarasubramanianV, et al.Bilateral contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation reveals new insights into the interhemispheric competition model in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2019; 33: 707–17.
33.
EthierCGallegoJAMillerLE. Brain-controlled neuromuscular stimulation to drive neural plasticity and functional recovery. Curr Opin Neurobiol2015; 33: 95–102.
34.
BeijoraACBackAPFrezAR, et al.Peripheral electrical stimulation on neuroplasticity and motor function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Res2023; 45: 1111–26.
35.
HeSHuangSHuangL, et al.LiDAR-Based hand contralateral controlled functional electrical stimulation system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2023; 31: 1776–85.
ChoiIKwonGHLeeS, et al.Functional electrical stimulation controlled by motor imagery brain-computer interface for rehabilitation. Brain Sci2020; 10: 512.
38.
FurlanJCPakoshMCravenBCPopovicMR. Insights on the potential mechanisms of action of functional electrical stimulation therapy in combination with task-specific training: a scoping review. Neuromodulation2022; 25: 1280–8.
39.
GandhiDBSterbaAKhatterHPandianJD. Mirror therapy in stroke rehabilitation: current perspectives. Ther Clin Risk Manag2020; 16: 75–85.
40.
WangYXLuoZZ. Research on the effect of MT + FES training on sensorimotor Cortex. Neural Plast2022; 2022: 6385755.
41.
ZhangYZhangXChengC, et al.Mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for the upper limb motor function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil2024; 46: 2528–34.
42.
XuRZhangHZhaoX, et al.Symmetrical contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation enhanced cortical activity and synchronization of stroke survivors. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2023; 31: 2287–95.
43.
XuGHuoCYinJ, et al.Effective brain network analysis in unilateral and bilateral upper limb exercise training in subjects with stroke. Med Phys2022; 49: 3333–46.
44.
KimMGLeeSAParkEJ, et al.Elastic dynamic sling on subluxation of hemiplegic shoulder in patients with subacute stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 9975.
45.
de OliveiraFCLPairot de FontenayBBouyerLJ, et al.Kinesiotaping for the rehabilitation of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a randomized clinical trial. Sports Health2021; 13: 161–72.
46.
VafadarAKCoteJNArchambaultPS. Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation in improving clinical outcomes in the upper arm following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int2015; 2015: 729768.
47.
AbdelhakiemNMMustafa SalehMSShabanaMMA, et al.Effectiveness of a high-intensity laser for improving hemiplegic shoulder dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep2024; 14: 7346.
48.
CamargoPRNeumannDA. Kinesiologic considerations for targeting activation of scapulothoracic muscles - part 2: trapezius. Braz J Phys Ther2019; 23: 467–75.
