This study aimed to examine the influence of real-time feedback on intentional abdominal muscle engagement in adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP) during daily activities. The research further sought to evaluate the outcomes of this training on neuromuscular control, pain perception, and functional capacity.
Objective
We compared a group of adults who received real-time feedback on changes in waist circumference with a group trained in abdominal contraction without real-time feedback.
Methods
Surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals were measured in the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and erector spinae (ES) muscles. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), and functional outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Results
After the intervention, sEMG signals of the RA, EO, and IO muscles were significantly higher in the experimental group. There were no significant differences in ES muscle activity between the groups. Both the experimental and control groups showed significant decreases in VAS and ODI scores after the intervention.
Conclusion
Intentional abdominal contraction aided by real-time feedback can improve functionality in patients with chronic low back pain.
CasianoVESarwanGDydykAM, et al.Back pain. Treasure Island (FL), USA: StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan.
2.
BurkusMPfäfflinHZdichavskyM, et al.Morel-Lavallee lesion: report of two cases of a rare extensive closed soft-tissue injury. Orv Hetil2022; 163: 645–650.
3.
NicolVVerdaguerCDasteC, et al.Chronic low back pain: a narrative review of recent international guidelines for diagnosis and conservative treatment. J Clin Med2023; 12: 1685.
4.
CzaprowskiDStolinskiLTyrakowskiM, et al.Non-structural misalignments of body posture in the sagittal plane. Scoliosis Spinal Disord2018; 13: 6.
5.
NeumannDA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundations for rehabilitation. Second edition. St. Louis: Mosby, 2010.
6.
GordonRBloxhamS. A systematic review of the effects of exercise and physical activity on non-specific chronic low back pain. Healthcare2016; 4: 22.
7.
LeeKJ. The relationship of trunk muscle activation and core stability: a biomechanical analysis of Pilates based stabilization exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 12804.
8.
HlaingSSPuntumetakulRKhineE, et al.Effects of core stabilization exercise and strengthening exercise on proprioception, balance, muscle thickness and pain related outcomes in patients with subacute nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2021; 22: 998.
9.
HodgesPW. Core stability exercise in chronic low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am2003; 34: 245–254.
10.
Huxel BlivenKCAndersonBE. Core stability training for injury prevention. Sports Health2013; 5: 514–522.
11.
HuangHWolfSLHeJ. Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation. J Neuroengineering Rehabil2006; 3: 11.
12.
AmanJEElangovanNYehIL, et al.The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci2015; 8: 1075.
13.
LinSZhuBZhengY, et al.Effect of real-time ultrasound imaging for biofeedback on trunk muscle contraction in healthy subjects: a preliminary study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2021; 22: 142.
14.
PuntumetakulRSaiklangPTapanyaW, et al.The effects of core stabilization exercise with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver technique versus general strengthening exercise on lumbar segmental motion in patients with clinical lumbar instability: a randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 7811.
15.
GranataKPWilsonSE. Trunk posture and spinal stability. Clin Biomech2001; 16: 650–659.
16.
DayanECohenLG. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron2011; 72: 443–454.
17.
ZengCYZhangZRTangZM, et al.Benefits and mechanisms of exercise training for knee osteoarthritis. Front Physiol2021; 12: 794062.
18.
BhondoekhanFMarshallBDLShiremanTI, et al.Racial and ethnic differences in receipt of nonpharmacologic care for chronic low back pain among medicare beneficiaries with OUD. JAMA Netw Open2023; 6: e2333251.
19.
SeongJHKimCBChoiJD. The effects of intentional abdominal muscle contraction through real-time feedback on sensed changes in waist circumference on pain, functional capacity and neuromuscular control in adults with lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Ther Korea2018; 25: 1–11.
20.
AnderssonGBLucenteTDavisAM, et al.A comparison of osteopathic spinal manipulation with standard care for patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med1999; 341: 1426–1431.
21.
HaakeMMüllerHHSchade-BrittingerC, et al.The German multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, prospective trial of acupuncture for chronic low-back pain: a preliminary report on the rationale and design of the trial. J Altern Complement Med2003; 9: 763–770.
22.
AlrwailyMTimkoMSchneiderM, et al.Treatment-based classification system for low back pain: revision and update. Phys Ther2016; 96: 1057–1066.
23.
GohelVMehendaleN. Review on electromyography signal acquisition and processing. Biophys Rev2020; 12: 1361–1367.
24.
CrommertMEHalvorsenKEkblomMM. Trunk muscle activation at the initiation and braking of bilateral shoulder flexion movements of different amplitudes. PloS One2015; 10: e0141777.
25.
YoudasJWBoorMMDarflerAL, et al.Surface electromyographic analysis of core trunk and hip muscles during selected rehabilitation exercises in the side-bridge to neutral spine position. Sports Health2014; 6: 416–421.
26.
Vera-GarciaFJMoresideJMMcGillSM. MVC Techniques to normalize trunk muscle EMG in healthy women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2010; 20: 10–16.
27.
JensenMPSmithDGEhdeDM, et al.Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain2001; 91: 317–322.
28.
SheahanPJNelson-WongEFischerSL. A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry disability dndex: the adaptation process, construct validity, test–retest reliability and internal consistency. Disabil Rehabil2015; 37: 2367–2374.
29.
GigginsOMPerssonUMCaulfieldB. Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil2013; 10: 60.
30.
NeblettR. Surface electromygraphic (sEMG) biofeedback for chronic low back pain. Healthcare2016; 4: 27.
31.
LiYYanLHouL, et al.Exercise intervention for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Public Health2023; 11: 1155225.
32.
SouzaGMBakerLLPowersCM. Electromyographic activity of selected trunk muscles during dynamic spine stabilization exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2001; 82: 1551–1557.
33.
KentPO’SullivanPSmithA, et al.Restore-cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open2019; 9: e031133.
34.
ChanthapetchPKanlayanaphotpornRGaogasigamC, et al.Abdominal muscle activity during abdominal hollowing in four starting positions. Man Ther2009; 14: 642–646.
35.
StüppLResendeAPMPetricelliCD, et al.Pelvic floor muscle and transversus abdominis activation in abdominal hypopressive technique through surface electromyography. Neurourol Urodyn2011; 30: 1518–1521.
36.
SadoraJVilsmarkEBasharaA, et al.Electromyography-biofeedback for chronic low back pain: a qualitative cohort study. Complement Ther Med2023; 73: 102922.
37.
ShamsiMBSarrafzadehJJamshidiA. Comparing core stability and traditional trunk exercise on chronic low back pain patients using three functional lumbopelvic stability tests. Physiother Theory Pract2015; 31: 89–98.
38.
BrownSHMcGillSM. An ultrasound investigation into the morphology of the human abdominal wall uncovers complex deformation patterns during contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol2008; 104: 1021–1030.
