Problems in reading fluency have long been considered to be among the most common characteristics of students with mild disabilities and other special needs. In this article, we review research on reading fluency and provide recommendations for practice. Interventions that have received research attention include repeated reading, peer-mediated instruction, computer-guided practice, previewing, and combined approaches.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Carver, R.P., & Hoffman, J.V. (1981). The effect of practice through repeated reading on gain in reading ability using a computer-based instructional system. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 374-390.
3.
Dowhower, S.L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly , 22, 389-406.
4.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
Herman, P.A. (1985). The effect of repeated readings on reading rate, pauses, and word recognition accuracy. Reading Research Quarterly , 20, 553-565.
8.
Jones, K.M., Torgesen, J.K., & Sexton, M.A. (1987). Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint & Hunt I Program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122-128.
9.
Knupp, R. (1988). Improving oral reading skills of educationally handicapped elementary school-aged students through repeated readings. EdD Practicum Report, Nova University. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 297275)
10.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
11.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 197-213.
12.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (in press). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective teaching . Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall/Merrill .
13.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Bakken, J.P., & Whedon, C. (1996). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. In T E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Intervention research (Vol. 10, Part B, pp. 201-227). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
Mathes, P.G., & Fuchs, L.S. (1993). Peer-mediated reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 8, 233-243.
15.
Mathes, P.G., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Henley, A.M., & Sanders, A. (1994). Increasing strategic reading practice with Peabody classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 44-48.
16.
Mathes, P.G., Simmons, D.C., & Davis, B.I. (1992). Assisted reading techniques for developing reading fluency. Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 70-77.
17.
Moyer, S.B. (1982). Repeated reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45,619-623.
18.
O'Shea, L.J., Sindelar, P.T., & O'Shea, D.J. (1987). The effects of repeated reading and attentional cues on the reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103-109.
19.
Otto, W. (1985). Practice makes perfect: always __ sometimes never __. Journal of Reading, 29,188-191.
20.
Rashotte, C.A. & Torgesen, J.K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly , 20, 180-188.
21.
Reitsma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 219-235.
22.
Rose, T.L. (1984). The effects of two prepractice procedures on oral reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 544-548.
23.
Rose, T.L., & Beattie, J.R. (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly , 9, 193-199.
24.
Royer, J.M. (1997). A cognitive perspective on the assessment, diagnosis, and remediation of reading skills. In G. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning (pp. 199-234). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
Royer, J.M., & Sinatra, G.M. (1994). A cognitive theoretical approach to reading diagnostics . Educational Psychology Review, 6, 81-113.
26.
Salend, S.J., & Nowak, M.R. (1988). Effects of peer-previewing on LD students' oral reading skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 47-53.
27.
Samuels, S.J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 4, 403-408.
28.
Samuels, S.J. (1987). Information processing abilities and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 18-22.
29.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1998). Tutoring and students with special needs. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 165-182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
30.
Simmons, D.C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Hodge, J.P., & Mathes, P.G. (1994). Importance of instructional complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 203-212.
