Many different methods have been developed to remediate problems of students with disabilities. Research studies evaluating the relative effectiveness of such practices can be overwhelming to educators because of the sheer number of studies—hundreds—as well as the conflicting results produced by some investigations. In this article, we use meta-analyses to make sense of this research, offering general guidelines for best practice in special education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle: Educational Achievement Systems.
2.
Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Singlecase research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. A. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 296–309.
4.
Cooper, H. M., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
Forness, S. R., & Kavale, K. A. (1994). Meta-analysis in intervention research: Methods and implications. In J. Rothman & J. Thomas (Eds.), Intervention research: Effective methods for professional practice (pp. 117–131). Chicago: Haworth Press.
6.
Forness, S. R., Kavale, K. A., Blum, I., & Lloyd, J. W. (1997). What works in special education and related services: Using meta-analysis to guide practice. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(6), 4–9.
7.
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (in press). Efficacy of special education and related services. American Association on Mental Retardation (Monograph Series).
8.
Lessen, E., Dudzinski, M., Karsh, K., & Van Acker, R. (1989). A survey of ten years of academic intervention research with learning disabled students: Implications for research and practice. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 106–122.
9.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Bakken, J. P., & Whedon, C. (1996). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 10, pp. 277–303). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
10.
Mostert, M. P. (1996). Reporting meta-analysis in learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11, 2–14.
11.
Quinn, M. M., Kavale, K. A., Mathur, S. R., Forness, S. R., & Rutherford, R. B. (1997). The effectiveness of social skills training for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A metaanalysis. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 11, pp. 293–312). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33.
13.
White, D. M., Rusch, F. R., Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1989). Applications of meta analysis in individual-subject research. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 281–296.
14.
Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. A. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 296–309.
15.
Casto, G., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1986). The efficacy of early intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 52, 417–424.
16.
Cook, S. B., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. C. (1986). Handicapped students as tutors. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 483–492.
17.
Forness, S. R., & Kavale, K. A. (1996). Treating social skill deficits in children with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 2–13.
18.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.
19.
Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. (1979). Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2–16.
20.
Kavale, K. A. (1981). Functions of the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA): Are they trainable?Exceptional Children, 47, 496–510.
21.
Kavale, K. A. (1982). The efficacy of stimulant drug treatment for hyperactivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 280–289.
22.
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1983). Hyperactivity and diet treatment: A meta-analysis of the Feingold hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 324–330.
23.
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1987). Substance over style: A quantitative synthesis assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54, 228–234.
24.
Kavale, K. A., & Mattson, P. D. (1983). “One jumped off the balance beam”: Meta-analysis of perceptual-motor training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 165–173.
25.
Kavale, K. A., & Nye, C. (1984). The effectiveness of drug treatment for severe behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 117–130.
26.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1989). Constructing more meaningful relations: Mnemonic instruction for special populations. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 83–111.
27.
Robinson, T. R., Brownell, M. T., Smith, S. W., & Miller, M. D. (1997). Cognitive-behavior modification of hyperactivity/impulsivity and aggression: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28.
Schmidt, M., Weinstein, T., Niemic, R., & Walberg, H. J. (1986). Computer-assisted instruction with exceptional children. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 493–501.
29.
Skiba, R., & Casey, A. (1985). Interventions for behavior disordered students: A quantitative review and methodological critique. Behavioral Disorders, 10, 239–252.
30.
Talbott, E., Lloyd, J. W., & Tankersley, M. (1994). Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 223–232.
31.
White, W. A. T. (1988). A meta-analysis of effects of direct instruction in special education. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 364–374.
