We encourage our readers to submit ideas, suggestions, or manuscripts for Spotlight. This feature of Intervention focuses on a specific school program, clinic, camp, or individual concerned with special and remedial education. We would be pleased to assist our readers in developing an article for this column.--GW
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Children's Defense Fund. (1992, July). SV Entertainment, p. 13.
2.
Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., & Hall R. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52535–542.
3.
Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children52219–232.
4.
Fenstermacher, G. D., & Goodlad, J. I. (1983). Individual differences and the common curriculum [82nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Mathes, P. G. (1993, April). Peer-mediated learning strategies: Effects on learners at different points on the reading continuum.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
6.
Fuchs, D., Mathes, P. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (1993). Peabody classwide peer tutoring reading methods [Unpublished teacher's manual]. (Available from Douglas Fuchs, Box 328, George Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203)
7.
Fuchs, D., Mathes P. G., Fuchs, L. S., & Dempsey, S. (1994, April). Peer-mediated learning in reading: Adapting instruction for all students.Presentation made at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
8.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Bishop, N. (1992). Teacher planning for students with learning disabilities: Differences between general and special educators. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7120–128.
9.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., & Stecker, P. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Education Research Journal, 28617–641.
10.
Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C., & Fuchs, D. (1990). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic reading [Computer program]. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
11.
Hodgkinson, H. (1991). Reform versus reality. Phi Delta Kappan, 739–16.
12.
Jenkins, J. R., & Jenkins, L. (1985). Peer tutoring in elementary and secondary programs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17 (6), 1–12.
13.
Jenkins, J. R., Jewell, M., Leceister, L., & Troutner, N. (1990, April). Development of a school building model for educating handicapped and at-risk students in general education classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, Boston, MA.
14.
Juel, C. (1988, April). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grade.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
15.
Lesgold, A. M., & Resnick, L. (1982). How reading difficulties develop: Perspectives from a longitudinal study. In J. Das, R. Mulcahy, & A. Wall (Eds.), Theory and research in learning disabilities (pp. 155–187). New York: Plenum.
16.
Mathes, P. G., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Henley, A. M., & Sanders, A. (1994). Increasing strategic reading practice with Peabody Classwide Peer Tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 944–48.
17.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
Peterson, P. L., & Clark, C. M. (1978). Teachers' reports of their cognitive process during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 25417–432.
19.
Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents of individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 251–30.
20.
Will, M. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52411–415.
