Details ways that assistive technology can be used in the classroom for students with mild disabilities
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asen, S. (1994a, February). Another side of equity. Keynote address at the annual conference of the Technology and Media Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, St. Paul, MN.
2.
Asen, S. (1994b). Teaching and learning with technology.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3.
Becker, H. J., & Sterling, C. W. (1987). Equity in school computer use: National data and neglected considerations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 289–311.
4.
Behrmann, M. M., Morrissette, S. K., & McCallen, M. H. (1992). Assistive technology issues for Virginia schools [Technical report]. Submitted to the Virginia State Special Education Advisory Committee.
5.
Cosden, M. A., Gerber, M. M., Goldman, S. R., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1986). Survey of microcomputer access and use by mildly handicapped students in southern California. Journal of Special Education Technology, 7(4), 5–13.
6.
Davis, L., & Nelson, J. (1993). Critical information needs of state directors of special education [Technical report] Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, National Information Action Center.
7.
Federal Register, 1991, August 19 (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. sT 300).
8.
Franklin, K. S. (1991). Supported employment and assistive technology---A powerful partnership. In S. L. Griffin & W. G. Revell (Eds.), Rehabilitation counselor desktop guide to supported employment.Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Supported Employment.
9.
Goldman, S. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1987). Information processing and educational microcomputer technology: Where do we go from here?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 144–154.
10.
Hasselbring, T., & Goin, L. (1994, June). Advanced institute: Anchored instruction multimedia for enhancing teacher education.Presentation at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
11.
Hasselbring, T., Goin, L., & Bransford, J. (1987, April). Assessing and developing math automaticity in learning disabled students: The role of microcomputer technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
12.
Johnson, L. J., Pugach, M. C. & Devlin, S. (1990). Professional collaboration. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22, 9–11.
13.
Johnston, N. S. (1990). School consultation: The training needs of teachers and school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 51–56.
14.
Lahm, E., & Morrissette, S. (1994, April). Zap 'em with assistive technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Denver, CO.
15.
Lieber, J., & Semmel, M. I. (1985). Effectiveness of computer application to instruction with mildly handicapped learners: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 6(5), 5–12.
16.
MacArthur, C. A., Haynes, J. A., & Malouf, D. B. (1986). Learning disabled students' engaged time and classroom interaction: The impact of computer assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(2), 189–197.
17.
Painter, D. D. (1994). A study to determine the effectiveness of computer-based process writing with learning disabled students under two conditions of instruction: Peer collaborative process model and nonpeer collaborative process model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
18.
SALT (Society for Applied Learning Technology). (1988). Report: Computers alone can't solve schools' problems. Instructional Delivery Systems, 2(2), 20.
19.
Skinner, B. (1986, October). Programmed instruction revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 103–110.
20.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. (OTA-SET-379) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (1993). Fifteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
Williams, R. R. (1991). Assistive technology and people with disabilities: Separating fact from fiction. A.T. Quarterly, 2(5), 7.
