Using picture drawings as a learning strategy for students with reading problems
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andre, M. E., & Anderson, T. H. (1978--1979). The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 605–623.
2.
Bos, C., & Vaughn, S. (1991). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. (1985). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning (Report No. 334). Cambridge, MA: Bolt BeRanek & Newman, Inc.
4.
Chan, L. K. S., & Cole, P. (1986). The effects of comprehension monitoring training on the reading competence of learning disabled and regular class students. Remedial and Special Education, 7(4), 33–40.
5.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
6.
Liddle, W. (1977). Reading for concepts: Book A.New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
McConnell, S. (1993). Talking drawings: A strategy for assisting learners. Journal of Reading, 36, 260–269.
8.
Morrison, J. P., & Manis, F. R. (1982). Cognitive processes and reading disability: A critique and proposal. In C. J. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.), Verbal processes in children (pp. 59–93). New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Palincsar, A., David, Y. M., Winn, J. A., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Examining the contexts of strategy instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 43–53.
10.
Paris, S., & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting meta-cognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7–15.
11.
Reid, D. K., & Stone, C. A. (1991). Why is cognitive instruction effective? Underlying learning mechanisms. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 8–19.
12.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1993). Current approaches to science education: Implication for mainstream instruction of students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 15–24.
13.
Spear, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1987). An information processing framework for understanding reading disability. In S. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 2–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 32–71.
15.
Wong, B., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing meta-comprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240.
