An update on litigation regarding residential placement of students with disabilities within the legal parameters of IDEA
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrahamson v. Hershham, 701 F.2d 223 (5th Cir. 1983).
2.
Antkowiak v. Ambach, 838 F.2d 635 (2d Cir. 1988).
3.
Bales v. Clarke, 523 F. Supp. 1366 (E. D. Va. 1981).
4.
Burlington School Committee v. Department of Education, 471 U.S. 359 (1985).
5.
David v. Darmouth School Committee, 775 F.2d 411 (1st Cir. 1985).
6.
Duncan, K., Beck, D. L., &Granum, R. A. (1988). Project EXPLORE: An activity-based counseling group. The School Counselor, 35, 215–219.
7.
Evans v. School District No. 17, 841 F.2d 824 (8th Cir. 1988).
8.
Giacobbe, G. A., &Schneider, F. C. (1986). The success rate index: A method for evaluating residential treatment programs. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 10, 97–105.
9.
Huefner, D. S. (1989). Special education residential placements under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Journal of Law and Education, 18, 411–440.
10.
Huefner, D. S. (1991). Judicial review of the special educational program requirements under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Where have we been and where should we be going? Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 14, 484–516.
11.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1991, P.L. 101–476. 20 U.S.C. $sT 1400 et seq.
12.
Jones, J. M. (1985). Stages of family involvement in the residential treatment of adolescents. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 381–390.
13.
Kruelle v. New Castle County School District, 642 F.2d 687 (3d Cir. 1981).
14.
Lewis, W. C. (1988). The role of ecological variables in residential treatment. Behavioral Disorders, 13, 98–107.
15.
Los Altos Union High School District v. Sharon B. H., 709 F.2d 28 (9th Cir. 1983).
16.
Maier, H. W. (1987). Learning to live and living to learn in residential treatment. Child and Youth Services, 9, 129–141.
17.
North v. District of Columbia, 471 F. Supp. 136 (D.D.C. 1979).
18.
Papacoda v. State of Connecticut, 528 F. Supp. 68 (D. Conn. 1981).
19.
Passman, J. P. (1989). Retroactive reimbursement: The standard of review for a parent's unilateral placement under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Cardozo Law Review, 10, 2381–2406.
20.
Rothstein, L. F. (1990). Special education law.White Plains, NY: Longman.
21.
Scituate School Committee v. Robert B., 620 F. Supp. 1224 (D.R.I. (1985).
22.
Siegel, L. I. (1987). Confrontation and support in group therapy in the residential treatment of severely disturbed adolescents. Adolescence, 22, 681–690.
23.
Springdale School District v. Grace, 794 F. Supp. 266 (W. D. Ark. 1980).
24.
Stephens, S. A., Lakin, K. C., Braven, M., &O'Reilly, F. (1990). The study of programs of instruction for handicapped children and youth in day and residential facilities.Washington, DC: Department of Education and Mathematica Policy Research.
25.
Stoppleworth, L. J. (1983). Criteria for making the decision: Placement in residence for educational or other than educational reasons. Journal of Law and Education, 12, 78–85.
26.
Thomas, G. (1982). The responsibility of residential placements for children's rights to development. Child and Youth Services, 4, 23–45.
27.
Thomas, S. B. (1985). Legal issues in special education.Topeka, KS: The National Organization on Legal Problems of Education.
28.
U.S. Department of Education. (1991). To assure a free appropriate public education to all children with disabilities. Thirteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
29.
Virginia Department of Planning and Budget. (1990). Study of children's residential services.Richmond: Commonwealth of Virginia.
30.
Walker v. Cronin, 438 N.E.2d 582 (III. App. Ct. 1982).
