Outlines advantages of an ecological approach to developing instructional intervention, including the benefits resulting from the ongoing dialogue of a variety of professionals using a wide range of assessment components
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., &Hall, R. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52, 535–542.
2.
Deno, S., Mirkin, P., &Shinn, M. (1978). Behavioral perspectives on the assessment of learning disabled children. In J. Ysseldyke, (Ed.) Synthesis of the knowledge base: Identification and assessment of learning disabled children (Monograph No. 2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
3.
Deshler, D., &Schumaker, J. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–590.
4.
Epps, S., &Tindal, G. (1987). The effectiveness of differential programming in serving students with mild handicaps: Placement options and instructional programming. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, &H. J. Walberg, (Eds.) Handbook of special education: Research and Practice–-Learner characteristics and adaptive education (Vol. 1, pp. 213–248). New York: Pergamon.
5.
Graden, J. L., Casey, A., &Christensen, S. L. (1986). Implementing a prereferral intervention system: Part I. The model. Exceptional Children, 51, 377–384.
6.
Kratochwill, T. R., &Sheridan, S. M. (1990). Advances in behavioral assessment. In T. B. Gutkin, &C. R. Reynolds, (Eds.) The handbook of school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 328–364). New York: Wiley.
7.
MacMillan, D., Keagh, B., &Jones, R. (1986). Special education research on mildly handicapped learners. In M. C. Wittrock, (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed, pp. 686–724). New York: Macmillan.
8.
Messick, S. (1984). Assessment in context: Appraising student performance in relation to instructional quality. Educational Researcher, 13(3), 3–8.
9.
Reynolds, M. C. (1984). Classification of students with handicaps. In E. W. Gordon, (Ed.) Review of research in education (Vol. 11, pp. 63–92). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
10.
Thurlow, M. L., &Ysseldyke, J. E. (1980). Instructional planning: Information collected by school psychologists vs. information considered useful by teachers (Research Report No. 29). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
11.
Welch, M., &Link, D. P. (1991). The instructional priority system: A method for assessing the educational environment. Intervention In School and Clinic, 27, 91–96.
12.
West, J. F. (1990). Analysis of classroom and instructional demands.Austin, TX: Institute for Learning and Development.
13.
Wood, J. W. (1991). Adapting instruction for mainstreamed and at-risk students.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
14.
Ysseldyke, J. E., &Christenson, S. L. (1987). Evaluating students' instructional environments. Remedial and Special Education, 8(3), 17–24.
15.
Zins, J. E., Curtis, M. J., Graden, J. L., &Ponti, C. R. (1988). Helping students succeed in the regular classroom.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
