Details the relationship between elementary and special education, with particular attention given to teacher training in light of that relationship
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aksamit, D. L. (1990). Practicing teachers' perceptions of their preservice preparation for mainstreaming. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13, 21–29.
2.
Aksamit, D. L., &Alcorn, D. A. (1988). A preservice mainstream curriculum infusion model–-Student teachers' perceptions of program effectiveness. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 52–58.
3.
Alexander, C., &Strain, P. S. (1978). A review of educators' attitudes toward handicapped children and the concept of mainstreaming. Psychology in the Schools, 15, 390–396.
4.
Carlson, H. (1986). Alternative service delivery: A process consultation model to serve pupils with learning disabilities and low achievement in elementary and secondary school (Final Report). Duluth: Minnesota State Department of Education.
5.
Crisci, R. A. (1981). Competencies for mainstreaming: Problems and issues. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16, 175–182.
6.
Davis, W. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative debate: Its promise and problems. Exceptional Children, 55, 440–446.
7.
Gans, K. D. (1985). Regular and special educators' integration attitudes and implications for consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 8, 188–197.
8.
Graden, J. L., &Bauer, A. M. (1992). Using a collaborative approach to support students and teachers in inclusive classrooms. In S. Stainback, &W. Stainback, (Eds.) Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students (pp. 85–100). Baltimore: Brookes.
9.
Guskey, T. R. (1981). Measurement of the responsibility teachers assume for academic success. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 44–51.
10.
Haisley, F. B., &Gilberts, R. D. (1978). Individual competencies needed to implement P.L. 94–142. Journal of Teacher Education, 29, 30–33.
11.
Hoover, J. J., &Cessna, K. (1984). Preservice teachers' attitudes toward mainstreaming prior to student teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 49–51.
12.
Johnson, D. W., &Johnson A. B. (1984). Circles of learning.Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum Development and Supervision.
13.
Johnson, L. J., &Pugach, M. C. (1992). Continuing the dialogue: Embracing a more expansive understanding of collaborative relationships. In W. Stainback, &S. Stainback, (Eds.) Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 215–222.). Boston: Allyn &Bacon.
14.
Leyser, Y., &Abrams, P. D. (1986). Perceived training needs of regular and special education student teachers in the area of mainstreaming. The Exceptional Child, 33, 173–180.
15.
Leyser, Y., Abrams, P. D., &Lipscomb, E. (1982). Modifying attitudes of prospective elementary school teachers toward mainstreaming. Journal for Special Educators, 18(4), 1–10.
16.
Lilly, S. (1986, March). The relationship between general and special education: A new face on an old issue. Counterpoint, p. 10.
17.
Marshall, K. J., &Herrmann, B. A. (1990). A collaborative metacognitive training model for special education and regular education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13, 96–104.
18.
Naor, M., &Miligram, R. M. (1980). Two preservice strategies for preparing regular class teachers for mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 46, 292–294.
19.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1987). Learning disabilities: Issues in the preparation of professional personnel. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 229–231.
20.
Payne, R., &Murray, C. (1974). Principals' attitudes toward integration of the handicapped. Exceptional Children, 41, 123–125.
21.
Pugach, M. C. (1992). Unifying the preservice preparation of teachers. In W. Stainback, &S. Stainback, (Eds.) Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 255–269). Boston: Allyn &Bacon.
22.
Pugach, M., &Lilly, M. S. (1984). Reconceptualizing support services for classroom teachers: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 48–54.
23.
Reed, D. F., &Hill, A. D. (1981). Clinical experiences to prepare preservice teachers for mainstreaming.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Dallas, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 202 814)
24.
Reynolds, M. C., (1980). A common body of practice for teachers: The challenge of Public Law 94–142 to teacher education.Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota, National Support System Project.
25.
Reynolds, M. C., Wang, M. C., &Walberg, H. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
26.
Ringlaben, R. P. &Weller, C. (1981). Mainstreaming the special educator. Education Unlimited, 3(4), 19–22.
27.
Stainback, S., &Stainback, W. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
28.
Stamm, J. M. (1980). Teacher competencies: Recommendations for personnel preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 3, 52–57.
29.
Stephens, T. M., Blackhurst, A. E., &Magliocca, L. A. (1982). Teaching mainstreamed students.New York: Wiley.
30.
Stephens, T. M., &Braum, B. L. (1980). Measures of regular classroom teachers' attitudes toward handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 46, 292–294.
31.
Stone, B., &Brown, R. (1987). Preparing teachers for mainstreaming: Some critical variables for effective preservice programs. Educational Research Quarterly, 11(2), 7–10.
32.
U.S. Department of Education. (1986). Eighth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act.Washington, DC: Author.
33.
Vacca, N. A., &Kirst, N. (1977). Emotionally disturbed children and regular classroom teachers. Elementary School Journal, 77, 309–317.
