Grouping Students on the Microcomputer

Becker, H.J. 1985. The second national U.S. school uses of microcomputer survey. Paper presented at the World Conference on Computers in Education, Norfolk, VA.

Cosden, M.A. 1986. Teacher survey on perceptions of computer effectiveness: Longitudinal study of microeducational environments (Tech. Rep.). Santa Barbara: University of California, Project TEECh.

Cosden, M.A. , & English, J.P. 1986. The effects of grouping, self-esteem, and locus of control on microcomputer performance and help seeking by mildly handicapped students (Tech. Rep. No. 30.0). Santa Barbara: University of California, Project TEECh.

Cosden, M.A. , Gerber, M.M. , Semmel, D.S. , Goldman, S.R. , & Semmel, M.I. In press. Micro-educational environments and microcomputer use for special day class, resource room, and mainstream handicapped and nonhandicapped students, Exceptional Children.

Cosden, M.A. , Gerber, M.M. , Semmel, D.S. , Goldman, S.R. & Semmel, M.I. 1985. Software variations as a function of grouping and instructional setting (unpublished raw data).

Cosden, M. , Pearl, R. , & Bryan, T.H. 1985. The effects of cooperative and individual goal structures on learning disabled and nondisabled students. Exceptional Children, 52(2), pp. 103–114.

Cox, D.A.H . 1980. Early adolescent use of selected problem-solving skills using microcomputers (doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1980) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 200 449).

Hawkins, J. , Sheingold, K. , Gearhart, M. , & Berger, C. 1982. Microcomputers in schools: Impact on the social life of elementary classrooms. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 3, pp. 361–373.

Johnson, D.W. , Maruyama, G. , Johnson, R. , Nelson, D. , & Skon, L. 1981. Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), pp. 47–62.

Lieber, J. , & Semmel, M.I. 1985. Effectiveness of computer applications to instruction with mildly handicapped learners: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 6(5), pp. 5–12.

Lieber, J.A. , & Semmel, M.I. 1986a. The link between group size and performance on a microcomputer-delivered mathematics problem-solving task for handicapped and nonhandicapped students (Tech. Rep. No. 33.0). Santa Barbara: University of California, Project TEECh.

Lieber, J.A. , & Semmel, M.I. 1986b. The relationship between group configuration and interaction in dyads for handicapped and nonhandicapped students using microcomputers (Tech. Rep. No. 22.0). Santa Barbara: University of California, Project TEECh.

Peterson, P.L. , & Janicki, T.C. 1979. Individual characteristics and children's learning in large-group and small-group approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(5), pp. 677–687.

Riel, M.M. 1983. Investigating the system of development: The skills and abilities of dysphasic children (CHIP Report No. 115). San Diego: University of California, Center for Human Information Processing.

Slavin, R.E. 1983. Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.

Torgesen, J.K. 1984. Instructional uses of microcomputers with elementary aged mildly handicapped children. Special Services in the Schools, 1(1), pp. 37–48.

Webb, N.M. 1982. Student interaction and learning in small groups: Review of Educational Research, 52(3), pp. 421–445.