A peer tutoring format can successfully combine handicapped and nonhandicapped learners in a way that decreases prejudice toward the handicapped learner.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bursor, D., Marcon, R. and Coon, R.1981. The effects of a disabled cross-age tutor on the perceptions of normal kindergarten children. Journal for Special Educators, 17, pp. 166–73.
2.
DeCaro, J. and Areson, A. (Eds). 1984. Tutoring special students. Teaching, Learning and Development: Volume II. EC170–433.
3.
Esposito, B. and Peach, U.1983. Changing attitudes of preschool children toward handicapped persons. Exceptional Children, 49, pp. 361–363.
4.
Harris, J. and Aldridge, J.1983. Ten reasons why peer tutoring won't work. Academic Therapy19, pp. 43–46.
5.
Hendrickson, J. 1981. Using low achievers to tutor reading and mathematics. Paper presented at the International Reading Association conference. ED 221003.
6.
Maher, C.1984. Handicapped adolescents as cross-age tutors: program description and evaluation. Exceptional Children51, pp. 56–63.
7.
Osguthorpe, R.1985. Trading places: Why disabled students should tutor nondisabled students. The Exceptional Parent, pp. 41–48.
8.
Price, K. and Dequine, M.1982. Peer tutoring: It builds skills and self-concept. Academic Therapy19, pp. 365–371.
9.
Scruggs, T. and Osguthorpe, R. 1985. Tutoring interventions within special education settings: A comparison of cross-age and peer tutoring. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Council for Exceptional Children. ED 258–419.
10.
Strom, R.1981. Accountability and educating the handicapped. Educational Forum45, pp. 337–350.