Another option to the list of teaching alternatives for remediating reading problems
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, R.D.1972. A comparison of the neurological impress method, the language experience approach, and classroom teaching for children with reading disabilities. Washington D.C.: National Center for Educational Research and Development Regional Research Program.
2.
Chomsky, C.1976. After decoding: What?Language Arts53:3, 288–296.
3.
Cook, J.E., and others. 1976. The effect of neurological impress on reading-disabled children with auditory perception impairment. Miami, Florida. Annual Meeting of the College Reading Assocition.
4.
Gardner, C. 1965. The experimental use of the impress method of reading habilitation. U.S. Office of Education Co-op Reading Project No. S167.
5.
Gibbs, V., and Proctor, S.1977. Reading together: An experiment with neurological impress method. Contemporary Education48:3, 156–157.
6.
Graham, A.1978. The 3C's method of teaching beginning reading. Academic Therapy13:4, 447–453.
7.
Groff, P.1979. A critique of teaching reading as a whole-task venture. The Reading Teacher32:6, 647–652.
8.
Heckelman, R.G.1966. Using the neurological impress remedial reading technique. Academic Therapy Quarterly1:4, 230–239.
9.
Heckelman, R.G.1969. A neurological impress method of remedial reading instruction. Academic Therapy4:4, 277–282.
10.
Hollingsworth, P.M.1970. An experiment with the impress method of teaching reading. The Reading TeacherXXIV:2, 112–114.
11.
Hollingsworth, P.M.1978. An experimental approach to the impress method of teaching reading. The Reading Teacher31:6, 624–626.
12.
Hoskisson, K., and Krohm, B.1974. Reading by immersion: Assisted Reading. Elementary English51:7, 832–836.
13.
Hoskisson, K.1975. The many facets of assisted reading. Elementary English52:3, 312–315.
14.
Johnson, M.A.C. 1979. The effect of storytime reading while listening on first grade reading achievement. Master's Thesis. Kean College of New Jersey.
15.
Jordan, W.C.1967. Prime-o-tec: The new reading method. Academic Therapy2:4, 248–250.
16.
Laffey, J.L., and others. 1979. The effect of repeated reading of taped literature on reading achievement. San Antonio, Texas. Meeting of The National Reading Conference.
17.
Lefevre, C.A., and Kapel, D.E.1975. Remedial reading: A dialect-free alternative; three studies. New York City, New York. Convention of the International Reading Association.
18.
Meyer, V.1982. Prime-o-Tec: A successful strategy for adult disabled readers. Journal of Reading25:6, 512–515.
19.
Neville, M.H.1968. Effect of oral and echoic responses in beginning reading. The British Journal of Educational Psychology59:5, 363–369.
20.
Neville, M.H., and Pugh, A.K.1974. An empirical study of the listening while reading method. Eleventh Annual Conference of the United Kingdom Reading Association.
21.
Richardson, J., and Craker, G.1980. Helping poor readers in the primary school: new insights. Australian Journal of Reading3:3, 131–136.
22.
Schneeburg, H.1977. Listening while reading: A four year study. The Reading Teacher30:6, 629–635.
23.
Simon, L., and others. 1975. A taped-echoic response method with segmented print for poor readers in secondary school. Unpublished study. City College of New York and Theodore Roosevelt School.
