No Service Provider Left Behind: Using the Triangulation Gap Analysis Tool for Related Service Providers

Abstract

Addressing the unique needs of students, including their related service needs, in postsecondary transition planning is essential. However, related service providers may face barriers to involvement in the transition planning process. The Triangulated Gap Analysis Tool: Related Services (TGAP:RS) is one way to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of transition planning for related service providers. Providers can follow a step-by-step process to identify annual goals that are meaningful and relevant to a student’s postsecondary aspirations. The TGAP:RS tool emphasizes the related service provider’s expertise in addressing the student’s future environmental needs and provides a conduit for improving collaboration among all Individualized Education Program (IEP) team members in the transition planning process.

Keywords

collaboration IEP processes related service personnel target audience special educators transition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2012). 2012 schools survey report: SLP caseload characteristics. www.asha.org/research/memberdata/schoolssurvey

Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. (1976). https://www.officialasvab.com/researchers/enlistment-eligibility/

Benson

J. D.

Szucs

K. A.

Mejasic

J. J.

(2016). Teachers’ perceptions of the role of occupational therapists in schools. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 9(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2016.1183158

Bray

L. E.

Russell

J. L.

(2018). The dynamic interaction between institutional pressures and activity: An examination of the implementation of IEPs in the secondary inclusive settings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718756189

Choi

J. W.

Lee

K. S.

Han

(2020). Psychiatric disorders and suicide risk among adults with disabilities: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 263, 9–14. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.129

Colorado Department of Education. (2020). Colorado academic standards online. Colorado Academic Standards. https://www.ced.state.co.us/app/standards/3

Endrew

F. v.

Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. 386 (2017).

Erickson

A. G.

Clark

G. M.

Patton

J. R.

(2013). Informal assessments for transition planning (2nd ed.). Pro-Ed.

Francis

G. L.

Stride

Reed

(2018). Transition strategies and recommendations: Perspectives of parents of young adults with disabilities. British Journal of Special Education, 45(3), 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12232

10.

Glover

McCormack

Smith-Tamaray

(2015). Collaboration between teachers and speech and language therapists: Services for primary school children with speech, language, and communication needs. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 31(3), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659015603779

11.

Gothberg

J. E.

Peterson

Peak

Sedaghat

J. M.

(2015). Successful transitions of students with disabilities to 21st-century college and careers: Using triangulation and gap analysis to address nonacademic skills. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(6), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915587890

12.

Gottfried

Kim

Fletcher

T. L.

(2024). Do teachers perceive absent students differently? AERA Open, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241259398

13.

Green

Chance

Stockholm

(2019). Implementation and perceptions of classroom-based service delivery: A survey of public school clinicians. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 656–672. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_lshss-18-0101

14.

Hunter

Rath

Barnes

Hilliard

White

C. L.

McGiffert-Sandoval

(2025). “Take me to the bridge”: Transitional support for minoritized twice-exceptional learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 57(6), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599241239332

15.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (2004). 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

16.

Lee

Ramirez

Castruita-Rios

Chen

Tansey

(2023). Effective secondary services in transition-age youth with disabilities: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 37(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1891/RE-22-12

17.

Levine

Marder

Wagner

(2004). Services and support for secondary school students with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2) [Executive summary]. https://nlts2.sri.com/reports/2004_05/nlts2_report_2004_05_execsum.pdf

18.

Lowman

J. J.

(2015). A comparison of three professional development mechanisms for improving the quality of standards-based IEP objectives. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(4), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740115595338

19.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Rowe

D. A.

Kwiatek

Voggt

Chang

W. H.

Fowler

C. H.

Poppen

Sinclair

Test

D. W.

(2021). Secondary transition predictors of postschool success: An update to the research base. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 47–64. https://doi-org.unco.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/2165143420959793

20.

McKittrick

L. L.

(2022). Parents of children who are deafblind face challenges in fostering collaboration within individualized education program teams. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 42(2), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221127103

21.

National Center for O*NET Development. (n.d.a). 49-3031.00 - Bus and Truck Mechanics and Diesel Engine Specialists. O*NET OnLine. https://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/49-3031.00

22.

National Center for O*NET Development. (n.d.b). O*NET OnLine. https://www.onetonline.org/

23.

National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: The Collaborative. (n.d.). Postsecondary education and training preparation toolkit. https://transitionta.org/postsecondary-education-training-prep/

24.

Nelson

Cothren Cook

Zarate

Powell

S. R.

Maggin

D. M.

Drake

K. R.

Kiss

A. J.

Ford

J. W.

Sun

Espinas

D. R.

(2021). A systemic review of meta-analysis in special education: Exploring the evidence base for high-leverage practices. Remedial and Special Education, 43(5), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211063491

25.

Newman

L. A.

Madaus

J. W.

Javitz

H. S.

(2016). Effect of transition planning on postsecondary support receipt by students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915615884

26.

Office of Disability Employment Policy. (n.d.). Disability employment statistics. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/odep/research-evaluation/statistics

27.

Peterson

L. Y.

Burden

J. P.

Sedaghat

J. M.

Gothberg

J. E.

Kohler

P. D.

Coyle

J. L.

(2013). Triangulated IEP transition goals: Developing relevant and genuine annual goals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(6), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500606

28.

Pfeiffer

D. L.

Pavelko

S. L.

Hahs-Vaughn

D. L.

Dudding

C. C.

(2019). A national survey of speech-language pathologists’ engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice in schools: Identifying predictive factors and barriers to implementation. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-18-0100

29.

Postsecondary National Policy Institute. (2025, April). Students with disabilities in higher education. https://pnpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/StudentswithDisabilities_FactSheet_Apr25.pdf

30.

Seruya

F. M.

Garfinkel

(2020). Caseload and workload: Current trends in school-based practice across the United States. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(5), 7405205090p1–7405205090p8. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.039818

31.

Sisti

M. K.

Robledo

J. A.

(2021). Interdisciplinary collaboration practices between education specialists and related service providers. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1123

32.

Smith

T. J.

Hugh

Fontechia

(2023, November 15). Unemployment and underemployment of people with disabilities: An untapped resource within the global economy. Unemployment – Nature, Challenges and Policy Responses. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003706

33.

Sprunger

N. S.

Harvey

M. W.

Quick

M. M.

(2018). Special education transition predictors for post-school success: Findings from the field. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1393789

34.

Trach

(2012). Degree of collaboration for successful transition outcomes. Journal of Rehabilitation, 78(2), 39–48.

35.

Trainor

A. A.

Morningstar

M. E.

Murray

(2016). Characteristics of transition planning and services for students with high-incidence disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715607348

36.

Van Trigt

(2019). Inequality in global disability policies since the 1970s. In Christiansen

C.O.

Jensen

S. L. B.

(Eds.), Histories of Global Inequality (pp. 187–206). Palgrave Macmillan.

37.

Yell

Bateman

(2024). The critical nature of collaboration in special education: An analysis of the IDEA. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 35(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2024.2391329