This article explores the importance of teaching students with learning disabilities to be prompt engineers. With the development, release, and global implementation of large language models (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini), artificial intelligence (AI) tools are becoming more dynamic and capable of providing feedback and support to students. This article offers practical strategies for introducing and teaching prompt engineering, including classroom activities such as using drawing, sentence frames, image generation, and checklists. In addition, the article highlights the importance of using AI responsibly and ethically, with students maintaining their own ideas. By creating stronger prompt engineers, students with disabilities who struggle with writing can utilize AI as a valuable tool to improve their writing skills and become more confident and independent writers.
BarbettaP. M. (2024). Remedial and compensatory writing technologies for middle school students with learning disabilities and their classmates in inclusive classrooms. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 68(4), 340–351.
3.
BerningerV. W.AmtmannD. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 345–363). The Guilford Press.
4.
BozkurtA.SharmaR. C. (2023). Generative AI and prompt engineering: The art of whispering to let the genie out of the algorithmic world. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), i–vii.
BrindleM.GrahamS.HarrisK. R.HebertM. (2016). Third and fourth grade teacher’s classroom practices in writing: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 29, 929–954.
7.
Copilot. (2025, August12). Conversation about creating an image of a tiger [AI conversation]. Microsoft Copilot.
8.
Copilot. (2025, December15). Conversation about creating an image of a dog playing football [AI conversation]. Microsoft Copilot.
9.
DawsonK.AntonenkoP.LaneH.ZhuJ. (2019). Assistive technologies to support students with dyslexia. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(3), 226–239.
10.
De La PazS.LevinD. M.ButlerC. (2023). Addressing an unfulfilled expectation: Teaching students with disabilities to write scientific arguments. Written Communication, 40(2), 448–481.
11.
EvmenovaA. S.ReganK. (2019). Supporting the writing process with technology for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(2), 78–85.
12.
GilbertJ.GrahamS. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4-6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 494–518.
13.
GoldmanS. R.CarreonA.SmithS. J.ZimmermanK. N. (2024). Educational technology to support written expression: A systematic literature review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231210987
14.
GoldmanS. R.SmithS. J.CarreonA. (2025). Artificial intelligence to support writing outcomes for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40(3), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434251326328
15.
GrahamS.BollingerA.Booth OlsonC.D’AoustC.MacArthurC.McCutchenD.OlinghouseN. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide (NCEE 2012-4058). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx#pubsearch
16.
GrahamS.CollinsA. A.Rigby-WillsH. (2017). Writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and typically achieving peers: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 199–218.
17.
HarrisK. R. (2021). SRSD instructional research for students with or at-risk for LD across the content areas: History and reflections. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(3), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12260
18.
HarrisK. R.McKeownD. (2022). Overcoming barriers and paradigm wars: Powerful evidence-based writing instruction. Theory into Practice, 61(4), 429–442.
19.
HockM. F.BulgrenJ. A.Brasseur-HockI. F. (2017). The strategic instruction model: The less addressed aspects of effective instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 166–179.
20.
KiuharaS. A.GrahamS.HawkenL. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136.
LaiZ. C. C. (2025). The impact of AI-assisted blended learning on writing efficacy and resilience. International Journal of Computer-assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 15(1), 1–21.
23.
LeeY.PazS. D. L. (2021). Writing scientific explanations: Effects of a cognitive apprenticeship for students with LD and English learners. Exceptional Children, 87(4), 458–475.
24.
LoL. S. (2023). The art and science of prompt engineering: A new literacy in the information age. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 27(4), 203–210.
25.
LuckinR.CukurovaM.KentC.Du BoulayB. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100076.
26.
MacArthurC. A. (2014). Technology applications for improving literacy: A review of research. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 565–590). The Guilford Press.
27.
MaharaniM. M. (2018). Graphic organizers to improve students’ writing on recount paragraphs. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(2), 211–221.
28.
McKeownD.WijekumarK.OwensJ.HarrisK.GrahamS.LeiP.FitzPatrickE. (2023). Professional development for evidence-based SRSD writing instruction: Elevating fourth grade outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, 102152.
NobelK.BarwasserA.GrünkeM.Asaro-SaddlerK.SaddlerB. (2021). Using a Simultaneous prompting procedure to improve the quality of the writing of three students with learning disabilities. International Education Studies, 14(11), 81–93.
31.
ParkJ.ChooS. (2024). Generative AI prompt engineering for educators: Practical strategies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40(3), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434241298954
32.
PenningtonJ.OkM. W.RaoK. (2018). A review of speech recognition technology for supporting writing in schools. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 12(2).
33.
Peterson-KarlanG. R. (2011). Technology to support writing by students with learning and academic disabilities: Recent research trends and findings. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 7(1), 39–62.
34.
PuckettK. S. (2024). Tools to support writing. Assistive Technology and Universal Design for Learning: Toolkits for Inclusive Instruction, 1, 145.
35.
PuranikC. S.KoutsoftasA. (2024). Writing in elementary students with language-based learning disabilities: A pilot study to examine feasibility and promise. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 55(3), 959–975.
RitcheyK. D.Coker JrD. L.MyersM. C.ZhangF. (2023). Teaching students to write sentences: A review of the literature. Topics in Language Disorders, 43(4), 317–332.
38.
RowlandA.SmithS. J.LowreyK. A.AbdulrahimN. A. (2020). Underutilized technology solutions for student writing. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(2), 99–106.
39.
SmithR. A.AllenA. A.PanosK. L.CiulloS. (2021). Sentence writing intervention for at-risk writers in upper elementary grades. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(4), 367–379.
40.
TroiaG. (2014). Evidence-based practices for writing instruction.
41.
Woods-GrovesS.RodgersD. B.AlqahtaniS. S.HughesC. A.Balint-LangelK.NeilK. M.HinzmanM. (2020). Efficacy of a computer-based editing strategy with postsecondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(2), 142–157.
