This article describes a comprehension strategy that can be used by teachers to help students identify and construct the main ideas for expository texts. The BURNS Strategy (i.e., Box. Underline. Reread. Note. Summarize.) was developed as part of a larger reading intervention to improve the comprehension performance of struggling readers in the elementary grades. The BURNS strategy was designed to incorporate thinking scaffolds and question prompts to guide students through a thinking process that might help them construct the main ideas. This article reports on the teaching process and instructional scaffolds used in the intervention, and discusses implications for teaching main ideas in the intervention setting.
BeckI. L.SandoraC. (2016). Illuminating comprehension and close reading. Guilford Press.
2.
BrownA. L.DayJ. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1–14.
3.
CarnahanC. R.WilliamsonP. (2013). Does compare-contrast text structure help students with autism spectrum disorder comprehend science text?Exceptional Children, 79(3), 347–363.
4.
CarnahanC. R.WilliamsonP. (2016). Systematically teaching students with autism spectrum disorder about expository text structures. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51(5), 293–300.
5.
CiulloS.LoY. L. S.WanzekJ.ReedD. K. (2014). A synthesis of research on informational text reading interventions for elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 257–271.
6.
CiulloS.OrtizM. B.Al OtaibaS.LaneK. L. (2016). Advanced reading comprehension expectations in secondary school: Considerations for students with emotional or behavior disorders. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(1), 54–64.
7.
DexterD. D.HughesC. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72.
8.
EnnisR. P. (2016). Using self-regulated strategy development to help high school students with EBD summarize informational text in social studies. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 545–568.
9.
HagamanJ. L.CaseyK. J. (2017). Paraphrasing strategy instruction in content area text. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(4), 210–217.
10.
HagamanJ. L.ReidR. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 29(4), 222–234.
11.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.MasonL. H. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35(7), 1–16.
12.
HarrisK. R.RayA.GrahamS.HoustonJ. (2019). Answering the challenge: SRSD instruction for close reading of text to write to persuade with 4th and 5th grade students experiencing writing difficulties. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(6), 1459–1482.
13.
HedinL. R.MasonL. H.GaffneyJ. S. (2011). Comprehension strategy instruction for two students with attention-related disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(3), 148–157.
14.
HoworthS.LopataC.ThomeerM.RodgersJ. (2016). Effects of the TWA strategy on expository reading comprehension of students with autism. British Journal of Special Education, 43(1), 39–59.
15.
JitendraA. K.BurgessC.GajriaM. (2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 135–159.
16.
JitendraA. K.GajriaM. (2011). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43(8), 1–16.
17.
JitendraA. K.HoppesM. K.XinY. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 127–139.
18.
JonesB.ChangS.HeritageM.TobiasonG.HermanJ. (2015). Supporting students in close reading. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California, Los Angeles.
19.
KintschW.van DijkT. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.
20.
KnightV. F.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M.SmithB. R.WoodC. L. (2013). Using systematic instruction and graphic organizers to teach science concepts to students with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 115–126.
21.
MariageT. V.EnglertC. S.MariageM. F. (2020). Comprehension instruction for Tier 2 early learners: A scaffolded apprenticeship for close reading of informational text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719861106
22.
MasonL. H. (2013). Teaching students who struggle with learning to think before, while, and after reading: Effects of self-regulated strategy development instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(2), 124–144.
23.
MasonL. H.SnyderK. H.SukhramD. P.KedemY. (2006). TWA + PLANS strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine fourth-grade students. Exceptional Children, 73(1), 69–89.
24.
MeyerB. J. F.BrandtD. M.BluthG. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 72–103.
25.
PearsonP. D.GallagherM. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344.
SandersS.EnnisR. P.LosinskiM. (2018). Effects of TWA on science text comprehension of students with emotional and behavior disorders in a special day school. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(4), 483–506.
ShinnM. M.ShinnM. R. (2002). AIMSweb® training workbook: Administration and scoring of early literacy measures for use with AIMSweb. Edformation, Inc.
30.
StevensE. A.ParkS.VaughnS. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131–149.
31.
StoneR. H.BoonR. T.ForeC.BenderW. N.SpencerV. G. (2008). Use of text maps to improve the reading comprehension skills among students in high school with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 33(2), 87–98.
32.
WhalonK. J.Al OtaibaS.DelanoM. E. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24(1), 3–16.
33.
WilliamsJ. P. (1988). Identifying main ideas: A basic aspect of reading comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 8, 1–13.
34.
WilliamsJ. P. (2003). Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (1st ed., pp. 293–305). Guilford Press.
35.
WilliamsJ. P. (2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 6–18.
