Enhancing Reading Comprehension in Middle School Classrooms Using a Critical Reading Routine

Abstract

To learn challenging content, middle school students are expected to read and comprehend complex text. This poses challenges for content-area teachers whose classes typically include students with reading difficulties and disabilities who have a variety of literacy needs. Some students struggle to decode text while many students struggle with complex vocabulary and comprehending upper-level concepts. Teachers can use a variety of instructional methods to increase opportunities for students to engage with text to enhance their understanding of concepts and support reading comprehension. This article provides guidance on how teachers can implement a critical reading of text routine that includes peer-mediated instruction. Adaptations to this routine that teachers can use to address students’ differing needs within the same content-area classroom are included. Resources are provided that teachers can use to differentiate and enhance implementation of the routine.

Keywords

intervention academic adolescence age strategies cognitive/cognition literacy peer(s)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

L. W.

Krathwohl

D. R.

(2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational outcomes. New York, NY: Longman.

Applebee

Langer

Nystrand

Gamoran

(2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instructions and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685–730. doi:10.3102/00028312040003685

Bloom

H. S.

Hill

C. J.

Black

A. R.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Educational Effectiveness, 1, 289–328. doi:10.1080/1934574080240072

Bulgren

Graner

Deshler

(2013). Literacy challenges and opportunities for students with learning disabilities in social studies and history. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 17–27. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12003

Davey

(1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27, 44–47.

Denton

Bryan

Wexler

Reed

Vaughn

(2007). Effective instruction for middle school students with reading difficulties: The reading teacher’s sourcebook. Austin: University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency. Retrieved from http://www.meadowscenter.org/vgc/materials/middle_school_instruction.asp

Edmonds

M. S.

Vaughn

Wexler

Reutebuch

Cable

Klingner

Schnakenberg

J. W.

(2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998

Haager

Vaughn

(2013). The common core state standards and reading: Interpretations and implications for elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 5–16. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12005

Hall

(2005). Teachers and content area reading: Attitudes, beliefs and change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 403–414.

10.

The IRIS Center. (2010). What should content-area teachers know about comprehension instruction? Page 13: Generating questions. Retrieved from https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/sec-rdng/cresource/q3/p13/

11.

Kamil

M. L.

Borman

G. D.

Dole

Kral

C. C.

Slinger

Torgesen

(2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE 2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

12.

McDonnell

Mathot-Buckner

Thorson

Fister

(2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 141–160.

13.

Mol

S. E.

Bus

A. G.

(2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 267–296. doi:10.1037/a0021890

14.

Ness

M. K.

(2009). Reading comprehension strategies in secondary content area classrooms: Teacher use of and attitudes towards reading comprehension instruction. Reading Horizons, 49, 143–166.

15.

Okilwa

N. S. A.

Shelby

(2010). The effects of peer tutoring on academic performance of students with disabilities in Grades 6 through 12: A synthesis of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 450–463. doi:10.1177/0741932509355991

16.

Parsad

Lewis

Farris

(2001). Teacher preparation and professional development: 2000 (NCES 2001–088). Washington, DC: Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.

17.

Quirk

M. P.

Schwanenflugel

P. J.

(2004). Do supplemental remedial reading programs address the motivational issues of struggling readers? An analysis of five popular programs. Reading Research and Instruction, 43, 1–19. doi:10.1080/19388070509558408

18.

Scornavacco

Moore

Boardman

Lasser

Buckley

Klingner

(2015). Using collaborative strategic reading to promote student discourse. In Metzler

Harris

(Eds.), The power of peers in the classroom (pp. 102–143). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

19.

Stevens

E. A.

Walker

M. A.

Vaughn

(2017). The effects of reading fluency interventions on the reading fluency and reading comprehension performance of elementary students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research from 2001 to 2014. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 576–590. doi:10.1177/0022219416638028

20.

Swanson

Wanzek

Vaughn

Fall

A.-M.

Roberts

Hall

Miller

V. L.

(2017). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below-average readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33, 37–53. doi:10.1080/10573569.2015.1072068

21.

Swanson

Wanzek

Vaughn

Roberts

Fall

A.-M.

(2015). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 426–442. doi:10.1177/0014402914563704

22.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Digest of education statistics, 2015 (NCES 2016-014; Chapter 2). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=59

23.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2018). 2017 NAEP Mathematics and Reading Assessments: Highlighted results at Grades 4 and 8 for the nation, states, and districts. Available from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/

24.

Vaughn

Fall

A.-M.

Roberts

Wanzek

Swanson

Martinez

(2019). Class percentage of students with reading difficulties on content knowledge and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52, 120-134. doi:10.1177/0022219418775117

25.

Vaughn

Klingner

J. K.

(1999). Teaching reading comprehension through collaborative strategic reading. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 284–292. doi:10.1177/105345129903400505

26.

Vaughn

Martinez

L. R.

Wanzek

Roberts

Swanson

Fall

A.-M.

(2017). Improving content knowledge and comprehension for English language learners: Findings from a randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 22–34. doi:10.1037/edu0000069

27.

Vaughn

Roberts

Swanson

E. A.

Wanzek

Fall

A.-M.

Stillman-Spisak

S. J.

(2015). Improving middle-school students’ knowledge and comprehension in social studies: A replication. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 31–50.

28.

Vaughn

Swanson

E. A.

Roberts

Wanzek

Stillman-Spisak

S. J.

Solis

Simmons

(2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 77–93. doi:10.1002/rrq.039

29.

Vaughn

Wanzek

Murray

C. S.

Roberts

(2012). Intensive interventions for students struggling in reading and mathematics: A practice guide. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

30.

Wanzek

Swanson

E. A.

Roberts

Vaughn

Kent

S. C.

(2015). Promoting acceleration of comprehension and content through text in high school social studies classes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8, 169–188. doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.906011

31.

Wanzek

Swanson

E. A.

Vaughn

Roberts

Fall

A.-M.

(2016). English learner and non-English learner students with disabilities: Content acquisition and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 82, 428–442. doi:10.1177/0014402915619419

32.

Wexler

Mitchell

M. A.

Clancy

E. E.

Silverman

R. D.

(2017). An investigation of literacy practices in high school science classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33, 258–277. doi:10.1080/10573569.2016.1193832

33.

Wexler

Reed

D. K.

Pyle

Mitchell

Barton

E. E.

(2015). A synthesis of peer-mediated academic interventions for secondary struggling learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 451–470. doi:10.1177/0022219413504997

34.

Wexler

Vaughn

Roberts

Denton

C. A.

(2010). The efficacy of repeated reading and wide reading practice for high school students with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 2–10. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00296