Although mobile phones and tablets can be effective tools for searching and retrieving information efficiently, accessing interactive learning platforms, and capturing audio/video, the inappropriate use of mobile devices can create distractions in the classroom that are detrimental to learning. This column presents a classroom management strategy for reducing the inappropriate use of mobile devices and increasing academic engagement in middle and high school classrooms, including students with emotional and behavioral disorders.
AlobiedatA. (2012). Faculty and student perception towards the appropriate and inappropriate use of mobile phones in the classroom at the University of Granada. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39, 5–16.
2.
BarrishH. H.SaundersM.WolfM. M. (1969). Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.
3.
BurnsS. M.LohenryK. (2010). Cellular phone use in class: Implications for teaching and learning: A pilot study. College Student Journal, 44, 805–810.
4.
CyrB. A.BermanS. L.SmithM. L. (2015). The role of communication technology in adolescent relationships and identity development. Child Youth Forum, 44, 79–92.
5.
DenuneH.HawkinsR.DonovanL.McCoyD.HallL.MoederA. (2015). Combining self-monitoring and an interdependent group contingency to improve the behavior of sixth graders with EBD. Psychology in the Schools, 52, 562–577.
6.
DijkmanM. A. M.HartingJ.Van Der WalM. F. (2015). Adoption of the Good Behavior Game: An evidence-based intervention for the prevention of behavior problems. Health Education Journal, 74, 168–182.
7.
DonaldsonJ. M.WiskowK. M.SotoP. L. (2015). Immediate and distal effects of the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 685–689.
8.
EngelG.GreenT. (2011). Cell phones in the classroom: Are we dialing up disaster?TechTrends, 55(2), 39–45.
9.
FlowerA.McKennaJ.MuethingC. S.BryantD. P.BryantB. R. (2014). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on class-wide off-task behavior in a high school basic algebra resource classroom. Behavior Modification, 38, 45–68.
10.
FroeseA. D.CarpenterC. N.InmanD. A.SchooleyJ. R.BarnesR. B.BrechtP. W.ChaconJ. D. (2012). Effects of classroom cell phone use on expected and actual learning. College Student Journal, 46, 323–332.
11.
HernanC. J. (2016). Using an antecedent intervention and interdependent group contingency to decrease the inappropriate use of mobile devices in high school classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
12.
JacksonL. D. (2013). Is mobile technology in the classroom a helpful tool or a distraction? A report of university students’ attitudes, usage practices, and suggestions for policies. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 8, 129–140.
13.
KleinmanK. E.SaighP. A. (2011). The effects of the Good Behavior Game on the conduct of regular education New York City high school students. Behavior Modification, 35, 95–105.
14.
LohrmannS.TalericoJ. (2004). Anchor the boat: A class-wide intervention to reduce problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 113–120.
15.
McCurdyB. L.LannieA. L.BarnabasE. (2009). Reducing disruptive behavior in an urban school cafeteria: An extension of the Good Behavior Game. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 39–54.
16.
PoduskaJ. M.KurkiA. (2014). Guided by theory, informed by practice: Training and support for the Good Behavior Game, a classroom-based behavior management strategy. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22, 83–94.
17.
RodriguezB. J.AndersonC. M. (2014). Integrating a social behavior intervention during small group academic instruction using a total group criterion intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 234–245.
18.
SalendS. J.ReynoldsC. J.CoyleE. M. (1989). Individualizing the Good Behavior Game across type and frequency of behavior with emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Modification, 13, 108–126.
19.
SheltonJ. T.ElliotE. M.EavesS. D.ExnerA. L. (2009). The distracting effects of a ringing cell phone: An investigation of the laboratory and the classroom setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 513–521.
20.
TheodoreL. A.BrayM. A.KehleT. J.JensonW. R. (2001). Randomization of group contingencies and reinforcers to reduce classroom disruptive behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 267–277.
21.
ThomasK. M.O’BannonB. W.BoltonN. (2013). Cell phones in the classroom: Teachers’ perspectives of inclusion, benefits, and barriers. Computers in the Schools, 30, 295–308.
