This article discusses a research-based reading intervention called peer-assisted learning strategies in reading (PALS) and includes practical suggestions for educators concerned with literacy as a tool to reposition and empower students of color, English learners, and students with disabilities in schools and society. Following a rationale informed by historical oppression related to learners’ race, language, and ability, the article describes PALS methodology along with specific extensions for incorporating students’ lived experiences, considering disability as an important element of student diversity, and focusing on students’ progress and cooperation beyond their reading problems and competition.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 16(1), 1–32. doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
2.
AdomatD. S. (2014). Exploring issues of disability in children’s literature discussions. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(3). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3865/3644
3.
ArzubiagaA.RuedaR.MonzóL. (2002). Family matters related to the reading engagement of Latino children. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1, 231–243.
4.
AuK.RaphaelT. (2000). Equity and literacy in the next millennium. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 170–188.
5.
BalA.TrainorA. A. (2015). Culturally responsive experimental intervention studies: The development of a rubric for paradigm expansion. Review of Educational Research, 86, 319–359.
6.
CharltonJ. I. (2006). The dimensions of disability oppression: An overview. In DavisL. J. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 217–227). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CondraE. (2006). See the ocean. New York, NY: Inclusive Books.
8.
DavisL. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness and the body. London: Verso.
9.
DavisL. J. (2013). The end of identity politics: On disability as an unstable category. In DavisL. J. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 263–277). New York, NY: Routledge.
EngeströmY.2011. From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21, 598–628.
12.
FraustinoL. R. (2001). Hickory chair. New York, NY: Arthur A. Levine Books.
13.
FreireP. (1998). Cultural action and conscientization. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 452–477.
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BurishP. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence- based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 85–91.
15.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP. G.SimmonsD. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 174–206.
16.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ThompsonA.SvensonE.YenL.Al OtaibaS.. . . SaenzL. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 15–21.
17.
GillbornD. (2015). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and the primacy of racism: Race, class, gender, and disability in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 277–287.
18.
GulbrandsenP.HjortdahlP.FugelliP. (1997). General practitioners’ knowledge of their patients’ psychosocial problems: Multipractice questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 314, 1014–1018.
19.
HarryB. (2008). Collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families: Ideal versus reality. Exceptional Children, 74, 372–388.
HooverJ. J. (2013). Linking assessment to instruction in multi-tiered models: A teacher’s guide to selecting reading, writing, and mathematics interventions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
JiménezR. T. (2004). Theoretical promise, perennial problems, and empirical progress concerning Latino students and literacy. In FairbanksC. M.WorthyJ.MalochB.HoffmanJ. V.SchallertD. L. (Eds.), 53rd yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 90–100). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference Inc.
24.
LordC. (2008). Rules. New York, NY: Scholastic.
25.
MaheadyL.MalletteB.HarperG. F. (2006). Four classwide peer tutoring models: Similarities, differences, and implications for research and practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 65–89.
26.
MathesP. G.HowardJ. K.AllenS. H.FuchsD. (1998). Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 3(1), 62–94.
27.
McMasterK. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2007). Promises and limitations of peer-assisted learning strategies in reading. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5, 97–112.
28.
Mejía-ArauzR.RogoffB.DexterA.Najafi (2007). Cultural variation in children’s social organization. Child Development, 78, 1001–1014.
29.
MitchellD.SnyderS. (2003). The eugenic Atlantic: Race, disability, and the making of an international eugenic science, 1800–1945. Disability & Society, 18, 843–864.
30.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
31.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.
32.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
34.
SáenzL. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 231–247.
35.
ScullJ. A.BiancoJ. L. (2008). Successful engagement in an early literacy intervention. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 8, 123–150.
36.
SnowC. (2006). What counts as literacy in early childhood? In McCartneyK.PhillipsD. (Eds.), Handbook of early child development (pp. 274–294). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37.
StromM. D. (2002). Rainbow Joe and me. New York, NY: Lee and Low Books.
38.
SullivanA. L.ArtilesA. J. (2011). Theorizing racial inequity in special education: Applying structural theory to disproportionality. Urban Education, 46, 1526–1552.
39.
SwadenerB. B.LubeckS. (1995). Children and families “at promise”: Deconstructing the discourse of risk. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
40.
SwansonH. L. (2000). What instruction works for students with learning disabilities?: Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. In GerstenR.SchillerE. P.VaughnS. (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses on the knowledge base of critical instructional issues (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
ThoriusK. A. K. (2016). Stimulating artifact-mediated tensions in special education teachers’ figured world: An approach toward inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 1326–1343. doi:10.1080/13603116.2016.1168877
42.
ThoriusK. A. K.SkeltonS. M. (2016, February). Equity & civil rights imperatives in literacy education for students with dis/abilities. Keynote presented to The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Madison, WI.
43.
ThoriusK. A. K.SullivanA. L. (2012). Interrogating instruction and intervention in RTI research with students identified as English language learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 29(1), 64–88.
44.
ThoriusK. A. K.TanP. (2015). Expanding analysis of educational debt: Considering intersections of race and ability. In ConnorD.FerriB.AnnammaS. A. (Eds.), DisCrit: Critical conversations across race, class, & dis/ability (pp. 87–100). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
45.
U.S. Department of Education & Office for Civil Rights. (2012). Helping to ensure equal access to education. Washington, DC: Author.
46.
VaughnS.MathesP.Linan-ThompsonS.CirinoP.CarlsonC.Pollard-DurodolaS.. . . FrancisD. (2006). Effectiveness of an English intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. Elementary School Journal, 107, 153–180.
47.
WaitollerF. R.ThoriusK. A. K. (2016). Cross-pollinating Culturally sustaining pedagogy with universal design for learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for student dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86, 366–389.
48.
WesslerS. L.De AndradeL. L. (2006). Slurs, stereotypes, and student interventions: Examining the dynamics, impact, and prevention of harassment in middle and high school. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 511–532.
49.
WillisA. I.HarrisV. J. (2000). Political acts: Literacy learning and teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 72–88.
