Students with disabilities often struggle in science and underperform in this important content area when compared to their typical peers. Unfortunately, many special educators have had little preparation to develop science content knowledge or skills in methods for teaching science. Despite their lack of content knowledge, special educators are often solely responsible for teaching science to students with disabilities in resource settings and self-contained classrooms; while in inclusive settings, special educators may be called on to coteach or consult. Given their increased role in teaching this content, special educators may experience anxiety about their own science knowledge. This column provides special educators, via self-directed learning, with information and resources to enhance their science content knowledge and build awareness of students’ ideas in science so they can provide high-quality instruction in science for students with disabilities.
AbellS. K.VolkmannM. J. (2006). Seamless assssment in science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
3.
BrownellM. T.RossD. D.ColónE. P.McCallumC. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. Journal of Special Education, 38, 242–252. doi:10.1177/00224669050380040601
4.
BryantD. P.SmithD. D.BryantB. R. (2005). Who are students with learning disabilities? In BryantD. P.SmithD. D.BryantB. R. (Eds.), Teaching students with special needs in inclusive classrooms (pp. 49–54). Boston, MA: Pearson.
5.
DexterD. D.ParkY. J.HughesC. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of graphic organizers and science instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities: Implications for the intermediate and secondary science classroom. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 204–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00341.x
6.
DriverR.GuesneE.TiberghienA. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
7.
DriverR.LeachJ.MillarR.ScottP. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Bristol, PA: McGraw-Hill.
8.
GreerD. L.MeyenE. L. (2009). Special education teacher education: A perspective on content knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24, 196–203. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00293.x
9.
HarlenW. (1997). Primary teachers understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 323–337. doi:10.1007/BF02461757
10.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).
11.
KeeleyP. (2008). Science formative assessment: 75 practical strategies for linking assessment, instruction, and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
12.
KnowlesM. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education (Vol. 41). New York, NY: New York Association Press.
13.
KumarD. D. (2009). Approaches to interactive video anchors in problem-based science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 13–19. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9154-6
14.
KumarD.RamasamyR.StefanichG. P. (2001). Science for students with visual impairments: Teaching suggestions and policy implications for secondary educators. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(3).
15.
MarinoM. T.HayesM. T. (2012). Promoting inclusive education, civic scientific literacy, and global citizenship with videogames. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 945–954. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9429-8
16.
MarinoM. T.MarinoE. C.ShawS. F. (2006). Making informed decisions about assistive technology for students with high incidence disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(6), 18–25.
17.
MasonL. H.HedinL. (2011). Reading science text: Challenges for students with learning disabilities and considerations for teachers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 214–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00342.x
18.
MushayikwaE.LubbenF. (2009). Self-directed professional development—Hope for teachers working in deprived environments?Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 375–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.003
19.
National Center for Education Statistics (2011). The Nation’s Report Card: Science 2009 (NCES 2011-451). Institute of Education Sciences. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
20.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
OsborneR.FreybergP. (1985). Learning in Science. The implications of children’s science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
24.
SackesM.TrundleK. C.FlevaresL. M. (2009). Using children’s literature to teach standard-based science concepts in early years. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 415–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0304-5
25.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1993). Current Approaches to Science Education Implications for Mainstream Instruction of Students with Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 15–24.
26.
ScruggsT. E.BrighamF. J.MastropieriM. A. (2013), Common Core Science Standards: Implications for Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 49–57. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12002
27.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.WolfeS. (1994). Scientific reasoning of students with mild mental retardation: Investigating preconceptions and conceptual change. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 5, 223–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex0504_2
28.
SteeleM. M. (2007). Teaching science to students with learning differences. Science Teacher, 74(3), 25–27.
StevensC.WennerG. (1996). Elementary preservice teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 2–9. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb10204.x
31.
SwansonH. L.ZengX. (2013). Memory difficulties in children and adults with learning disabilities. In SwansonH. LHarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 214–238). New York, NY: Guilford.
32.
TherrienW. J.TaylorJ. C.HospJ. L.KaldenbergE. R.GorshJ. (2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 188–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00340.x
33.
TrygstadP. J. (2013). 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education: Status of elementary school science. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
34.
VannestK. J.Hagan-BurkeS. (2009). Teacher time use in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 126–142. doi:10.1177/0741932508327459
WatsonS.JohnstonL. (2007). Assistive technology in the inclusive science classroom. Science Teacher, 74(3), 34.
37.
WeisA. M. (2013). 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education: Status of middle school science. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
38.
WeissI. R.BanilowerE. R.McMahonK. C.SmithP. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
